Literature DB >> 10825720

Comparison of visual and auditory evoked cortical potentials in migraine patients between attacks.

J Afra1, A Proietti Cecchini, P S Sándor, J Schoenen.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: As both habituation of pattern reversal visual evoked potentials (PR-VEP) (Schoenen J, Wang W, Albert A, Delwaide PJ. Potentiation instead of habituation characterizes visual evoked potentials in migraine patients between attacks. Eur J Neurol 1995;2:115-122) and intensity dependence of auditory evoked cortical potentials (IDAP) (Wang W, Timsit-Berthier M, Schoenen J. Intensity dependence of auditory evoked potentials in migraine: an indication of cortical potentiation and low serotonergic neurotransmission? Neurology 1996;46:1404-1409) were found abnormal in migraine between attacks, we have searched for intraindividual correlations between both tests in 59 migraine patients (22 with aura [MA], 37 without aura [MO]) and in 23 healthy volunteers (HV).
METHODS: Amplitude change of the PR-VEP N1-P1 was measured between the 1st and 5th block of 50 sequential averagings during continuous stimulation at 3.1 Hz. IDAP was computed from N1-P2 amplitudes of 100 averagings during stimulations at 40, 50, 60 and 70 dB SL. Amplitude-stimulus intensity function (ASF) slopes and amplitude changes between 40 and 70 dB were calculated. MO and MA differed from HV in PR-VEP amplitude change (P=0.007) and IDAP slope (P = 0.0004).
RESULTS: There was no significant correlation between VEP amplitude changes and IDAP slopes, nor between the latter two and attack frequency or disease duration. A negative correlation was found between the amplitude of the first block of averaged responses and potentiation of VEP in all subject groups (P = 0.03) as well as between the amplitude of the auditory evoked potential, at 40 dB, and the percentage of amplitude increase between 40 and 70 dB in MO (P = 0.004) and MA (P = 0.007). ASF slopes and 40 dB amplitudes were significantly correlated only in the MA group (P = 0.002). These results confirm the interictal deficit of habituation in cortical processing of repetitive visual and auditory information in migraine. Since there is no intraindividual correlation between the cortical responses to these sensory modalities they are complementary tools for the study of migraine and may help to identify subgroups of patients with distinct pathophysiological mechanisms.
CONCLUSIONS: The strong negative correlation between the initial amplitude of evoked potentials and their amplitude increase during subsequent averaging confirms that the response potentiation in migraine is likely to be due to a reduced preactivation level of sensory cortices.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10825720     DOI: 10.1016/s1388-2457(00)00271-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol        ISSN: 1388-2457            Impact factor:   3.708


  27 in total

Review 1.  Cortical excitability in chronic migraine.

Authors:  Gianluca Coppola; Jean Schoenen
Journal:  Curr Pain Headache Rep       Date:  2012-02

2.  Altered brainstem auditory evoked potentials in a rat central sensitization model are similar to those in migraine.

Authors:  Xianghong Arakaki; Gary Galbraith; Victor Pikov; Alfred N Fonteh; Michael G Harrington
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2014-03-27       Impact factor: 3.252

Review 3.  Neuropsychiatric Disorders as Erratic Attention Regulation - Lessons from Electrophysiology.

Authors:  Goded Shahaf
Journal:  Psychiatr Q       Date:  2019-12

4.  The locus of flicker adaptation in the migraine visual system: a dichoptic study.

Authors:  Michel Thabet; Frances Wilkinson; Hugh R Wilson; Olivera Karanovic
Journal:  Cephalalgia       Date:  2012-11-12       Impact factor: 6.292

5.  Is phonophobia associated with cutaneous allodynia in migraine?

Authors:  Avi Ashkenazi; Irene Yang; Aamir Mushtaq; Michael L Oshinsky
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  2010-06-20       Impact factor: 10.154

6.  Painful heat reveals hyperexcitability of the temporal pole in interictal and ictal migraine States.

Authors:  E A Moulton; L Becerra; N Maleki; G Pendse; S Tully; R Hargreaves; R Burstein; D Borsook
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2010-06-18       Impact factor: 5.357

7.  Startle reactivity in children at risk for migraine.

Authors:  Roman Duncko; Lihong Cui; Jeffrey Hille; Christian Grillon; Kathleen R Merikangas
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-10-31       Impact factor: 3.708

8.  Excitatory neurotransmitters in brain regions in interictal migraine patients.

Authors:  Andrew Prescot; Lino Becerra; Gautam Pendse; Shannon Tully; Eric Jensen; Richard Hargreaves; Perry Renshaw; Rami Burstein; David Borsook
Journal:  Mol Pain       Date:  2009-06-30       Impact factor: 3.395

Review 9.  The electrophysiology of cluster headache.

Authors:  Dagny Holle; Mark Obermann; Zaza Katsarava
Journal:  Curr Pain Headache Rep       Date:  2009-04

10.  Ictal and interictal phonophobia in migraine-a quantitative controlled study.

Authors:  A Ashkenazi; A Mushtaq; I Yang; M L Oshinsky
Journal:  Cephalalgia       Date:  2009-03-12       Impact factor: 6.292

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.