Literature DB >> 10824046

Permanent pacemaker insertion in a district general hospital: indications, patient characteristics, and complications.

A Eltrafi1, P Currie, J H Silas.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: This report reviews the experience of permanent pacemaker insertion in a district general hospital (catchment population of 350 000) and makes a comparison with the national database and other hospitals in the UK.
METHODS: The records of all patients receiving a permanent pacemaker in the inclusive period January 1996 to December 1998 were reviewed. Data collected included number of patients paced each year, age, sex, indications, and complications.
RESULTS: In the three years reviewed 200 patients received new permanent pacemakers, a rate of 190 per million population per year, which is similar to the national implantation rate of permanent pacemakers but lower than that of most European countries (see discussion). The majority of patients paced were elderly (75% were above the age of 70 years). Atrioventricular block (including complete heart block, 45%, and Mobitz type 2 block, 12.5%) was the commonest indication for permanent pacemaker insertion, followed by sick sinus syndrome (25%) and these findings are comparable to those reported previously. However, carotid sinus syndrome was responsible for 16% of the patients paced and this was higher than that reported in the national database (6.5%). Only 1% of the pacemaker modes used was inappropriate and the complication rate was low at 3%.
CONCLUSIONS: This report confirms that permanent pacemaker insertion can be effectively and safely provided locally for the increasingly ageing population. The implantation rate both locally and nationally is still much lower than that of some countries in Europe.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10824046      PMCID: PMC1741607          DOI: 10.1136/pmj.76.896.337

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Postgrad Med J        ISSN: 0032-5473            Impact factor:   2.401


  10 in total

1.  The NASPE/BPEG generic pacemaker code for antibradyarrhythmia and adaptive-rate pacing and antitachyarrhythmia devices.

Authors:  A D Bernstein; A J Camm; R D Fletcher; R D Gold; A F Rickards; N P Smyth; S R Spielman; R Sutton
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  1987-07       Impact factor: 1.976

2.  Permanent pacemaker practice at a Scottish district general hospital between 1987 and 1993.

Authors:  J G Doherty; F Dawson; F Kerr
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1995-05

3.  Issues in cardiac pacing: can agism be justified?

Authors:  G E Payne; J D Skehan
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1994-08

4.  Survival in sinoatrial disorder (sick-sinus syndrome).

Authors:  D B Shaw; R R Holman; J I Gowers
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1980-01-19

5.  Chronic sinus node disease: natural course and indications for pacing.

Authors:  K Rasmussen
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  1981-12       Impact factor: 29.983

6.  Where's the block?

Authors:  A F Rickards
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1984-03-10

7.  The impact of a dedicated "syncope and falls" clinic on pacing practice in northeastern England.

Authors:  A B Dey; R S Bexton; M M Tyman; R G Charles; R A Kenny
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 1.976

8.  Validation of a method for choice of pacing mode in carotid sinus syndrome with or without sinus bradycardia.

Authors:  M Brignole; C Menozzi; G Lolli; D Oddone; L Gianfranchi; A Bertulla
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 1.976

9.  Stability of the DDD pacing mode in patients 80 years of age and older.

Authors:  S G Ray; D T Connelly; M Hughes; C M Bellamy; R G Charles
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 1.976

10.  Comparative survival after permanent ventricular and dual chamber pacing for patients with chronic high degree atrioventricular block with and without preexistent congestive heart failure.

Authors:  M A Alpert; J J Curtis; J F Sanfelippo; G C Flaker; J T Walls; V Mukerji; D Villarreal; S K Katti; N P Madigan; R B Krol
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1986-04       Impact factor: 24.094

  10 in total
  1 in total

1.  Is Mobitz type I atrioventricular block benign in adults?

Authors:  D B Shaw; J I Gowers; C A Kekwick; K H J New; A W T Whistance
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 5.994

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.