Literature DB >> 10823365

Savings in the cost of caring for patients with Alzheimer's disease in Canada: an analysis of treatment with rivastigmine.

A B Hauber1, A Gnanasakthy, J A Mauskopf.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To estimate per-patient potential cost savings using rivastigmine in the treatment of Alzheimer's disease (AD) in Canada.
BACKGROUND: In recent years, new members of a class of pharmaceuticals known as cholinesterase inhibitors have been introduced for the treatment of patients with AD. Two recent studies conducted in the United Kingdom and the United States estimated potential cost savings from the new cholinesterase inhibitor rivastigmine. The present study combined the disease-progression model used in those 2 studies with Canadian costs to estimate per-patient potential savings resulting from the treatment of AD in Canada.
METHODS: Efficacy data from 2 pivotal, phase III clinical trials of rivastigmine were used in a hazard model of disease progression to estimate long-term differences in cognitive functioning between patients receiving rivastigmine and patients receiving no treatment. We used the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) score as our measure of disease progression. We also used Canadian costs of AD care, estimated as a function of MMSE score, to estimate cost savings experienced by treated patients compared with patients receiving no treatment. All costs and cost savings are presented in 1997 Canadian dollars. We used a societal perspective in this analysis.
RESULTS: Rivastigmine was estimated to delay the transition to more severe stages of AD by up to 188 days for patients with mild AD after 2 years of treatment. For patients with mild-to-moderate and moderate disease, this delay was estimated to be 106 and 44 days, respectively. For patients with the mild stage of AD, estimated average daily cost savings (excluding the cost of rivastigmine) ranged from Can $0.45 per patient per day at 6 months to Can $6.44 per patient per day after 2 years of treatment. For all patients, these estimated average daily cost savings ranged from a low of Can $0.71 per patient per day after 6 months of treatment to a high of Can $4.93 per patient per day after 2 years.
CONCLUSION: On average, treatment with rivastigmine yields savings in the direct cost of caring for AD patients that exceed the cost of the drug after 2 years of treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10823365     DOI: 10.1016/s0149-2918(00)89012-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Ther        ISSN: 0149-2918            Impact factor:   3.393


  14 in total

1.  Modelling the cost effectiveness of cholinesterase inhibitors in the management of mild to moderately severe Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  Colin Green; Joanna Picot; Emma Loveman; Andrea Takeda; Jo Kirby; Andrew Clegg
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 4.981

2.  Long-term cost-effectiveness of donepezil for the treatment of Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  Stefan J Teipel; Michael Ewers; Veronika Reisig; Bernd Schweikert; Harald Hampel; Michael Happich
Journal:  Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci       Date:  2007-04-01       Impact factor: 5.270

Review 3.  Rivastigmine. A pharmacoeconomic review of its use in Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  H M Lamb; K L Goa
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 4.  Rivastigmine for Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  Jacqueline S Birks; Lee Yee Chong; John Grimley Evans
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-09-22

Review 5.  Assessment, measures and approaches to easing caregiver burden in Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  Karl Farcnik; Michelle S Persyko
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 3.923

Review 6.  Pharmacoeconomics of cholinesterase inhibitors in the treatment of Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  Linus Jönsson
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 4.981

7.  Assessment of Health Economics in Alzheimer's Disease (AHEAD): treatment with galantamine in Sweden.

Authors:  Frances B Garfield; Denis Getsios; J Jaime Caro; Anders Wimo; Bengt Winblad
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 8.  Modelling disease progression in Alzheimer's disease: a review of modelling methods used for cost-effectiveness analysis.

Authors:  Colin Green
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 4.981

9.  Cost effectiveness of memantine in moderately severe to severe Alzheimer's disease : a markov model in Finland.

Authors:  Clément François; Harri Sintonen; Raimo Sulkava; Benoît Rive
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 2.859

Review 10.  Economic considerations in the management of Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  Carolyn W Zhu; Mary Sano
Journal:  Clin Interv Aging       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 4.458

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.