Literature DB >> 11303418

Rivastigmine. A pharmacoeconomic review of its use in Alzheimer's disease.

H M Lamb1, K L Goa.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Alzheimer's disease is associated with a large cost burden, of which institutionalised care constitutes a major component. Therefore, the decision to move a patient from the community to institutionalised care is associated with a significant increase in direct costs. About three-quarters of patients with Alzheimer's disease are admitted to a nursing home within 5 years of diagnosis. Unpaid or informal caregiver time is another large cost in Alzheimer's disease, especially for patients cared for in the community; informal care can account for up to three-quarters of healthcare costs in non-institutionalised patients. Several cholinesterase inhibitors, of which rivastigmine is one, are available for the treatment of patients with mild to moderate Alzheimer's disease. By improving cognitive function and slowing the rate of cognitive decline, cholinesterase inhibitor therapy may reduce a significant part of the economic burden of the disease by delaying the move to institutionalised care. In the absence of prospective long term data which focus on pharmacoeconomic end-points, modelling techniques have been used to extrapolate clinical data available for some cholinesterase inhibitors, including rivastigmine. Four economic analyses, based on a single model of cognitive decline, have been performed with rivastigmine from the perspective of the provider or society. All show that rivastigmine therapy (excluding drug-related costs) is associated with cost savings in patients with mild to moderate Alzheimer's disease by delaying the time to institutionalisation. If the acquisition cost of the drug was factored in, the cost savings completely or partially offset treatment costs. The magnitude of the cost savings increased as the time horizon increased (up to 2 years). The largest savings were realised in patients with mild disease over a 2-year time-frame, suggesting that treatment should be initiated early from an economic viewpoint. Pharmacoeonomic data comparing different cholinesterase inhibitors are, as yet, unavailable.
CONCLUSION: Pharmacoeconomic analyses, based on modelled data excluding drug costs, indicate that rivastigmine completely or partially offsets the costs of treatment by delaying cognitive decline and the time to institutionalisation in patients with mild to moderate Alzheimer's disease. From a societal perspective, cost savings are realised if the drug is introduced early in the disease. Additional benefits offered by rivastigmine on behavioural symptoms, which may reduce caregiver burden, have yet to be investigated from a pharmacoeconomic perspective.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11303418     DOI: 10.2165/00019053-200119030-00008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics        ISSN: 1170-7690            Impact factor:   4.981


  59 in total

1.  Severe dementia: a common condition entailing high costs at individual and societal levels.

Authors:  B Winblad; A Wimo; H J Möbius; J M Fox; L Fratiglioni
Journal:  Int J Geriatr Psychiatry       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 3.485

Review 2.  Cholinesterase inhibitors: A new class of psychotropic compounds.

Authors:  J L Cummings
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 18.112

3.  Economic impact of Alzheimer's disease in the United Kingdom. Cost of care and disease severity for non-institutionalised patients with Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  E Souêtre; R M Thwaites; H L Yeardley
Journal:  Br J Psychiatry       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 9.319

Review 4.  Donepezil. Pharmacoeconomic implications of therapy.

Authors:  R H Foster; G L Plosker
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 5.  Cholinesterase inhibitors: a therapeutic strategy for Alzheimer disease.

Authors:  W J Krall; J J Sramek; N R Cutler
Journal:  Ann Pharmacother       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 3.154

6.  A 5-month, randomized, placebo-controlled trial of galantamine in AD. The Galantamine USA-10 Study Group.

Authors:  P N Tariot; P R Solomon; J C Morris; P Kershaw; S Lilienfeld; C Ding
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2000-06-27       Impact factor: 9.910

Review 7.  Economic research on Alzheimer disease: a review of the literature.

Authors:  R L Ernst; J W Hay
Journal:  Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 2.703

Review 8.  Cholinesterase inhibitors for the treatment of Alzheimer's disease in the elderly.

Authors:  C M VanDenBerg; Y Kazmi; M W Jann
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 3.923

9.  Efficacy and safety of rivastigmine in patients with Alzheimer's disease: international randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  M Rösler; R Anand; A Cicin-Sain; S Gauthier; Y Agid; P Dal-Bianco; H B Stähelin; R Hartman; M Gharabawi
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-03-06

10.  Relation between severity of Alzheimer's disease and costs of caring.

Authors:  M J Hux; B J O'Brien; M Iskedjian; R Goeree; M Gagnon; S Gauthier
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1998-09-08       Impact factor: 8.262

View more
  17 in total

1.  Health economics and health policy issues in Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  T Rapp
Journal:  J Nutr Health Aging       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 4.075

2.  The economic burden of the care and treatment for people with Alzheimer's disease: the outlook for the Czech Republic.

Authors:  Petra Marešová; Veronika Zahálková
Journal:  Neurol Sci       Date:  2016-07-28       Impact factor: 3.307

3.  Galantamine: a pharmacoeconomic review of its use in Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  Katherine A Lyseng-Williamson; Greg L Plosker
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 4.981

4.  Switching From Donepezil to Rivastigmine Is Well Tolerated: Results of an Open-Label Safety and Tolerability Study.

Authors:  Carl H Sadowsky; Martin R Farlow; Leone Atkinson; Jennifer Steadman; Barbara Koumaras; Michael Chen; Dario Mirski
Journal:  Prim Care Companion J Clin Psychiatry       Date:  2005

Review 5.  Memantine: a pharmacoeconomic review of its use in moderate-to-severe Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  Greg L Plosker; Katherine A Lyseng-Williamson
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 4.981

6.  Drug persistency of two cholinesterase inhibitors: rivastigmine versus donepezil in elderly patients with Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  Dong-Churl Suh; Simu K Thomas; Elmira Valiyeva; Stephen Arcona; Lien Vo
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 3.923

Review 7.  The estimation of utility weights in cost-utility analysis for mental disorders: a systematic review.

Authors:  Michael Sonntag; Hans-Helmut König; Alexander Konnopka
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 8.  Modelling disease progression in Alzheimer's disease: a review of modelling methods used for cost-effectiveness analysis.

Authors:  Colin Green
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 4.981

9.  Treatment strategies in Alzheimer's disease with a focus on early pharmacological interventions.

Authors:  Josef Marksteiner; Reinhold Schmidt
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 3.923

10.  Cholinesterase inhibitors for the treatment of Alzheimer's disease:: getting on and staying on.

Authors:  George T Grossberg
Journal:  Curr Ther Res Clin Exp       Date:  2003-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.