Literature DB >> 10822120

A randomized trial assessing the impact of written information on outpatients' knowledge about and attitude toward randomized clinical trials. The INFO trial group.

A Y Kruse1, L L Kjaergard, K Krogsgaard, C Gluud, E L Mortensen, A Gottschau, A M Bjerg.   

Abstract

To improve the patient education process in clinical research, three information materials describing general aspects of design and conduct of randomized clinical trials were developed. The materials varied in length, reading ability level, and reader appeal. Their influence on knowledge about and attitude toward randomized clinical trials was assessed in a randomized, parallel group, evaluator-blinded trial among 415 outpatients. The patients were randomized to the following groups: control (no intervention), leaflet, brochure, or booklet. Knowledge was assessed by a 17-item multiple-choice questionnaire and attitude was assessed by a 32-item Likert questionnaire at entry and 2 weeks after the intervention. The interventions and the questionnaires were pilot tested and power calculations were performed. At entry, the mean knowledge score was 7.9 points. At follow-up, the knowledge scores increased by 0.5 for the control, 1.0 for the leaflet, 1.6 for the brochure, and 1.4 for the booklet. The brochure and the booklet improved the knowledge score significantly compared with the control. The general attitude was positive at entry (mean 71.5 points). Only the booklet significantly increased the total attitude score (4.8 points) and the randomized clinical trials attitude subscale score (1.8 points). In conclusion, written information significantly improved outpatients' knowledge about and attitude toward randomized clinical trials. Detailed rather than brief information was more effective. Control Clin Trials 2000;21:223-240

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10822120     DOI: 10.1016/s0197-2456(00)00048-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Control Clin Trials        ISSN: 0197-2456


  11 in total

1.  Effects of presentation method on the understanding of informed consent.

Authors:  T H Moseley; M N Wiggins; P O'Sullivan
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-05-10       Impact factor: 4.638

2.  A comparison of patient knowledge of clinical trials and trialist priorities.

Authors:  P Cameron; G R Pond; R Y Xu; P M Ellis; J R Goffin
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 3.677

Review 3.  Strategies to improve recruitment to randomised trials.

Authors:  Shaun Treweek; Marie Pitkethly; Jonathan Cook; Cynthia Fraser; Elizabeth Mitchell; Frank Sullivan; Catherine Jackson; Tyna K Taskila; Heidi Gardner
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-02-22

4.  A randomized controlled trial of short and standard-length consent forms for a genetic cohort study: is longer better?

Authors:  Kenji Matsui; Reidar K Lie; Tanvir C Turin; Yoshikuni Kita
Journal:  J Epidemiol       Date:  2012-03-24       Impact factor: 3.211

5.  Participants' understanding of a randomized controlled trial (RCT) through informed consent procedures in the RCT for breast cancer screening, J-START.

Authors:  Yoko Narikawa Shiono; Ying-Fang Zheng; Masahiro Kikuya; Masaaki Kawai; Takanori Ishida; Shinichi Kuriyama; Noriaki Ohuchi
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2014-09-25       Impact factor: 2.279

6.  Informing potential participants about research: observational study with an embedded randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Helen M Kirkby; Melanie Calvert; Richard J McManus; Heather Draper
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-10-03       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  Improving understanding in the research informed consent process: a systematic review of 54 interventions tested in randomized control trials.

Authors:  Adam Nishimura; Jantey Carey; Patricia J Erwin; Jon C Tilburt; M Hassan Murad; Jennifer B McCormick
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2013-07-23       Impact factor: 2.652

8.  The impact of advertising patient and public involvement on trial recruitment: embedded cluster randomised recruitment trial.

Authors:  Adwoa Hughes-Morley; Mark Hann; Claire Fraser; Oonagh Meade; Karina Lovell; Bridget Young; Chris Roberts; Lindsey Cree; Donna More; Neil O'Leary; Patrick Callaghan; Waquas Waheed; Peter Bower
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2016-12-08       Impact factor: 2.279

9.  Educational interventions to improve people's understanding of key concepts in assessing the effects of health interventions: a systematic review.

Authors:  Leila Cusack; Chris B Del Mar; Iain Chalmers; Elizabeth Gibson; Tammy C Hoffmann
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2018-05-02

10.  Patient information leaflets (PILs) for UK randomised controlled trials: a feasibility study exploring whether they contain information to support decision making about trial participation.

Authors:  Katie Gillies; Wan Huang; Zoë Skea; Jamie Brehaut; Seonaidh Cotton
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2014-02-18       Impact factor: 2.279

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.