Literature DB >> 10820589

Detection of bilateral symmetry in complex biological images.

C S Evans1, P Wenderoth, K Cheng.   

Abstract

The recognition of bilateral symmetry in simple dot patterns is reliably influenced by orientation. Performance is best when the axis of symmetry is vertical. We conducted two experiments to determine whether stimulus orientation also affects detection of the low levels of naturally occurring asymmetry in complex biological images. University students judged whether colour images displayed on a computer monitor possessed perfect bilateral symmetry. Stimuli were generated from high-resolution plan-view images of crabs and insects. In experiment 1, the asymmetric stimuli were the original animals, displayed on a standard black background. Symmetrical versions of each natural image were generated by sectioning the shape at the midline, copying and reflecting one side and then fusing the two halves together. To facilitate comparison of results with those obtained in earlier studies, we also presented dot patterns based upon both the slightly asymmetric and perfectly symmetrical natural images. Experiment 2 was designed to assess whether symmetry detection was dependent upon the markings and patterns on the body and appendages of the animals. The natural images were converted to silhouettes and tested against matched dot patterns. In both studies, images were presented in a random sequence with the axis of symmetry vertical, horizontal, oblique left, and oblique right. Performance with the biological images was consistently better than with the dot patterns. Abolishing fine detail did not appreciably reduce this effect. A pronounced vertical advantage was apparent with all stimuli, demonstrating that this phenomenon is robust despite considerable variation in image complexity. The implications of orientation effects for perception of natural structures are discussed.

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10820589     DOI: 10.1068/p2905

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Perception        ISSN: 0301-0066            Impact factor:   1.490


  11 in total

1.  Symmetrical crypsis and asymmetrical signalling in the cuttlefish Sepia officinalis.

Authors:  Keri V Langridge
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2006-04-22       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Enhanced Facial Symmetry Assessment in Orthodontists.

Authors:  Tate H Jackson; Kait Clark; Stephen R Mitroff
Journal:  Vis cogn       Date:  2013

3.  Face symmetry assessment abilities: Clinical implications for diagnosing asymmetry.

Authors:  Tate H Jackson; Stephen R Mitroff; Kait Clark; William R Proffit; Jessica Y Lee; Tung T Nguyen
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 2.650

4.  European starlings are capable of discriminating subtle size asymmetries in paired stimuli.

Authors:  John P Swaddle; Charles W Johnson
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Categories and range effects in human spatial memory.

Authors:  Ken Cheng; Marcia L Spetch; Andros Hoan
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2010-12-21

6.  The spectacular human nose: an amplifier of individual quality?

Authors:  Se Kristine Rognmo Mikalsen; Ivar Folstad; Nigel Gilles Yoccoz; Bruno Laeng
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2014-04-17       Impact factor: 2.984

7.  Reference Frames and 3-D Shape Perception of Pictured Objects: On Verticality and Viewpoint-From-Above.

Authors:  Els V K Cornelis; Andrea J van Doorn; Johan Wagemans
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2016-06-29

8.  The aesthetic preference for symmetry dissociates from early-emerging attention to symmetry.

Authors:  Yi Huang; Xiaodi Xue; Elizabeth Spelke; Lijie Huang; Wenwen Zheng; Kaiping Peng
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-04-19       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  The extrastriate symmetry response can be elicited by flowers and landscapes as well as abstract shapes.

Authors:  Alexis D J Makin; Giulia Rampone; Elena Karakashevska; Marco Bertamini
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2020-05-11       Impact factor: 2.240

10.  What flowers do we like? The influence of shape and color on the rating of flower beauty.

Authors:  Martin Hůla; Jaroslav Flegr
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2016-06-07       Impact factor: 2.984

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.