Literature DB >> 10820343

Pericolonic tumor deposits in patients with T3N+MO colon adenocarcinomas: markers of reduced disease free survival and intra-abdominal metastases and their implications for TNM classification.

N S Goldstein1, J R Turner.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A pericolonic tumor deposit (PTD) is a grossly palpated adenocarcinomas within pericolonic adipose tissue not within a lymph node. The source and prognostic significance of PTDs has not been well defined.
METHODS: The authors studied 418 T3N+M0 colon adenocarcinomas to determine the frequency and significance of PTDs. They also step-sectioned 30 PTDs to determine their origin and assist in their optimum TNM classification.
RESULTS: Seventy-one (18%) of 400 consecutively examined cases had PTDs. The actuarial 1-, 2-, and 5-year disease free survival rates were significantly lower among patients with a PTD. PTDs, regardless of size, significantly impacted disease free survival. Increasing numbers of PTDs was associated with shorter disease free survival. Adenocarcinoma grade, a PTD, increasing numbers of PTDs, and number of lymph node metastases were independently associated with shorter disease free survival. The likelihood of extrahepatic abdominal failure was proportionally greater with increasing numbers of PTDs. Adenocarcinoma was observed in perineural, peri-large vessel, or intravascular locations in step-sectioned PTDs.
CONCLUSIONS: A PTD is a perineural, perivascular, or intravascular tumor extension beyond the muscularis propria. They are distinct from lymph node metastases and should not be considered their prognostic equivalent. The disease free survival impact of even small PTDs was significant, suggesting that PTDs of all sizes should be considered a single entity. TNM classification of PTDs as lymph node metastases or discontinuous tumor extension is probably not accurate. The number and greatest dimension of PTDs should be reported separately from lymph node metastases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10820343

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  43 in total

1.  The influence of nodal size on the staging of colorectal carcinomas.

Authors:  G Cserni
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 2.  Nodal staging of colorectal carcinomas and sentinel nodes.

Authors:  G Cserni
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 3.411

3.  Analysis of the seventh edition of American Joint Committee on colon cancer staging.

Authors:  Yuan-Tzu Lan; Shung-Haur Yang; Shih-Ching Chang; Wen-Yih Liang; Anna Fen-Yau Li; Huann-Sheng Wang; Jeng-Kai Jiang; Wei-Shone Chen; Tzu-Chen Lin; Jen-Kou Lin
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2011-12-08       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  Comment on: a clinicopathological investigation of "tumor nodules" in colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Giacomo Puppa; Tiziana Perin; Vincenzo Canzonieri
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 2.549

5.  Recommendations for the reporting of surgically resected specimens of colorectal carcinoma.

Authors:  Jeremy R Jass; Michael J O'Brien; Robert H Riddell; Dale C Snover
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2006-11-25       Impact factor: 4.064

6.  Should mesenteric tumor deposits be included in staging of well-differentiated small intestine neuroendocrine tumors?

Authors:  Raul S Gonzalez; Eric H Liu; JoAnn R Alvarez; Gregory D Ayers; M Kay Washington; Chanjuan Shi
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2014-01-24       Impact factor: 7.842

Review 7.  Controversies in the pathological assessment of colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Aoife Maguire; Kieran Sheahan
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-08-07       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 8.  Prognostic biomarkers in colorectal cancer: where do we stand?

Authors:  Xavier Sagaert
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2014-02-01       Impact factor: 4.064

9.  Lymph node negative colorectal cancers with isolated tumor deposits should be classified and treated as stage III.

Authors:  E J Th Belt; M F M van Stijn; H Bril; E S M de Lange-de Klerk; G A Meijer; S Meijer; H B A C Stockmann
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2010-07-13       Impact factor: 5.344

10.  Assessment of the prognostic factors for a local recurrence of rectal cancer: the utility of preoperative MR imaging.

Authors:  Young Taik Oh; Myeong Jin Kim; Joon Seok Lim; Joo Hee Kim; Kang Young Lee; Nam Kyu Kim; Won Ho Kim; Ki Whang Kim
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2005 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 3.500

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.