OBJECTIVE: This study was undertaken to determine whether a policy of delayed pushing for nulliparous women withcontinuous-infusion epidural analgesia reduces the risk of difficult delivery (cesarean delivery, operative delivery from a midpelvic position, low-pelvic procedures with rotation >45 degrees ). STUDY DESIGN: In this multicenter, randomized, controlled trial women in the delayed pushing group (n = 936) were advised to wait > or =2 hours after full dilatation before commencement of pushing. Women in the early pushing group (n = 926) were advised to commence pushing as soon as they had been randomly assigned. RESULTS: Difficult delivery was reduced with delayed pushing (relative risk, 0.79; 95% confidence interval, 0.66-0.95). The greatest effect was on midpelvic procedures (relative risk, 0.72; 95% confidence interval, 0.55-0.93). Although there was little evidence for an effect on low-pelvic procedures, spontaneous delivery was more frequent among women who practiced delayed pushing (relative risk, 1.09; 95% confidence interval, 1.00-1.18). Abnormal umbilical cord blood pH (<7.15 venous value or <7.10 arterial value) was more frequent in the delayed pushing group (relative risk, 2.45, 95% confidence interval, 1.35-4. 43). However, scores for a summary indicator, the Neonatal Morbidity Index, were similarly distributed in the 2 groups. CONCLUSION:Delayed pushing is an effective strategy to reduce difficult deliveries among nulliparous women.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: This study was undertaken to determine whether a policy of delayed pushing for nulliparous women with continuous-infusion epidural analgesia reduces the risk of difficult delivery (cesarean delivery, operative delivery from a midpelvic position, low-pelvic procedures with rotation >45 degrees ). STUDY DESIGN: In this multicenter, randomized, controlled trial women in the delayed pushing group (n = 936) were advised to wait > or =2 hours after full dilatation before commencement of pushing. Women in the early pushing group (n = 926) were advised to commence pushing as soon as they had been randomly assigned. RESULTS: Difficult delivery was reduced with delayed pushing (relative risk, 0.79; 95% confidence interval, 0.66-0.95). The greatest effect was on midpelvic procedures (relative risk, 0.72; 95% confidence interval, 0.55-0.93). Although there was little evidence for an effect on low-pelvic procedures, spontaneous delivery was more frequent among women who practiced delayed pushing (relative risk, 1.09; 95% confidence interval, 1.00-1.18). Abnormal umbilical cord blood pH (<7.15 venous value or <7.10 arterial value) was more frequent in the delayed pushing group (relative risk, 2.45, 95% confidence interval, 1.35-4. 43). However, scores for a summary indicator, the Neonatal Morbidity Index, were similarly distributed in the 2 groups. CONCLUSION: Delayed pushing is an effective strategy to reduce difficult deliveries among nulliparous women.
Authors: Lawrence Leeman; Anne M Fullilove; Noelle Borders; Regina Manocchio; Leah L Albers; Rebecca G Rogers Journal: Birth Date: 2009-12 Impact factor: 3.689
Authors: Andrea Lemos; Melania Mr Amorim; Armele Dornelas de Andrade; Ariani I de Souza; José Eulálio Cabral Filho; Jailson B Correia Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2017-03-26
Authors: Lisa Kane Low; Janis M Miller; Ying Guo; James A Ashton-Miller; John O L DeLancey; Carolyn M Sampselle Journal: Int Urogynecol J Date: 2012-07-25 Impact factor: 2.894
Authors: Patrick J Culligan; John A Myers; Roger P Goldberg; Linda Blackwell; Stephan F Gohmann; Troy D Abell Journal: Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct Date: 2004-07-29
Authors: Heather A Frey; Methodius G Tuuli; Sarah Cortez; Anthony O Odibo; Kimberly A Roehl; Anthony L Shanks; George A Macones; Alison G Cahill Journal: Am J Perinatol Date: 2012-12-03 Impact factor: 1.862