Literature DB >> 10819254

Magnetic resonance-guided stereotactic biopsies: results in 100 consecutive cases.

D Fontaine1, D Dormont, D Hasboun, S Clemenceau, C Valery, C Oppenheim, M Sahel, C Marsault, J Philippon, P Cornu.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We present the results of 100 consecutive magnetic resonance (MR)-guided biopsies in cases where computerised tomography (CT) guiding was considered dangerous or impossible.
METHOD: MR guiding was preferred to CT guiding for cases where lesions were located in the central area, or were not clearly visible on CT scan, or where the visualization of vessels was considered necessary. For most of the patients, calculation of target co-ordinates was performed using dedicated software enabling trajectory previsualization. There were 62 cases of contrast enhanced lesions, 32 cases of lesions without contrast enhancement, and 6 cases of very small lesions appearing hyperintense on T2-weighted images.
FINDINGS: Biopsies allowed a histological diagnosis in 92 cases. In 8 cases, the biopsy was negative (necrosis, gliosis or normal brain tissue). Three patients had a transient worsening of their neurological disturbances. Two patient had a non-regressive loss of motor function. No patient died.
INTERPRETATION: MR guiding for stereotactic biopsies was effective for CT-invisible or ill-defined lesions, lesions located in functional or densely vascularized areas and in the brain stem. The rate of postoperative complications was equivalent to or less than that reported in series of CT-guided biopsies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10819254     DOI: 10.1007/s007010050032

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)        ISSN: 0001-6268            Impact factor:   2.216


  6 in total

1.  Assessment of image guided accuracy in a skull model: comparison of frameless stereotaxy techniques vs. frame-based localization.

Authors:  Alfredo Quiñones-Hinojosa; Marcus L Ware; Nader Sanai; Michael W McDermott
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 4.130

2.  Brainstem encephalitis: etiologies, treatment, and predictors of outcome.

Authors:  Ik Lin Tan; Ellen M Mowry; Sonya U Steele; Carlos A Pardo; Justin C McArthur; Avindra Nath; Arun Venkatesan
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2013-06-09       Impact factor: 4.849

3.  Frame-based stereotactic biopsy remains an important diagnostic tool with distinct advantages over frameless stereotactic biopsy.

Authors:  Justin S Smith; Alfredo Quiñones-Hinojosa; Nicholas M Barbaro; Michael W McDermott
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 4.130

4.  Stereotactic biopsy of brain tumours in the paediatric population.

Authors:  E J St George; A R Walsh; S Sgouros
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2004-01-30       Impact factor: 1.475

Review 5.  The role of biopsy in the management of patients with presumed diffuse low grade glioma: A systematic review and evidence-based clinical practice guideline.

Authors:  Brian T Ragel; Timothy C Ryken; Steven N Kalkanis; Mateo Ziu; Daniel Cahill; Jeffrey J Olson
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2015-11-03       Impact factor: 4.130

6.  Evaluation of 311 contemporary cases of stereotactic biopsies in patients with neoplastic and non-neoplastic lesions-diagnostic yield and management of non-diagnostic cases.

Authors:  Krystyna Agnieszka Pasternak; Michael Schwake; Nils Warneke; Max Masthoff; Samer Zawy Alsofy; Eric Suero Molina; Walter Stummer; Stephanie Schipmann
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2020-09-20       Impact factor: 3.042

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.