Literature DB >> 10818323

Awareness during laryngoscopy and intubation: quantitating incidence following induction of balanced anesthesia with etomidate and cisatracurium as detected with the isolated forearm technique.

M St Pierre1, B Landsleitner, H Schwilden, J Schuettler.   

Abstract

STUDY
OBJECTIVE: To measure the incidence of awareness during induction of anesthesia with etomidate and fentanyl, and to model its frequency as a function of dose of etomidate.
DESIGN: Prospective cohort study.
SETTING: Anesthesia department of a university hospital. PATIENTS: 30 ASA physical status I, II, and III patients undergoing elective general surgery.
INTERVENTIONS: Patients were assigned to one of three groups of etomidate (0.2 mg/kg, 0.3 mg/kg, 0.4 mg/kg) and received fentanyl (2 microg/kg) and 2 x ED(95) of cisatracurium (0.1 mg/kg). Neuromuscular block was monitored with a peripheral nerve stimulator. Intubation was performed after maximum T(1)-depression. To identify awareness, the isolated forearm technique (IFT) was used. The IFT was performed by prompting the patient every 20 seconds. Only a verified response was considered a positive IFT response. Anesthesia was maintained with isoflurane in oxygen/air and fentanyl.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Maximum neuromuscular block occurred after 352 +/- 96 seconds and intubation was performed 424 +/- 86 seconds after loss of consciousness (LOC). Awareness was dose dependent: 80% of patients receiving 0.2 mg/kg etomidate, 70% of patients receiving 0.3 mg/kg etomidate, and 20% of patients receiving 0.4 mg/kg etomidate had a positive IFT response. Awareness occurred in one patient 3 minutes after LOC, in 65% during laryngoscopy, and in 30% within the following 120 seconds. One patient had explicit recall without finding awareness unpleasant. Hemodynamic parameters did not differ between patients with a positive or a negative IFT response.
CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of awareness during bolus induction can be modeled as dose dependent. However, when combining a short-acting induction drug and a delayed-onset neuromuscular blocker, the continuous infusion of the hypnotic drug may prevent awareness during induction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10818323     DOI: 10.1016/s0952-8180(00)00127-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Anesth        ISSN: 0952-8180            Impact factor:   9.452


  4 in total

Review 1.  Unresponsiveness ≠ unconsciousness.

Authors:  Robert D Sanders; Giulio Tononi; Steven Laureys; Jamie W Sleigh
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 7.892

Review 2.  Induction of anaesthesia: a guide to drug choice.

Authors:  Nathalie Nathan; Isabelle Odin
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 9.546

3.  Electroencephalographic dynamics of etomidate-induced loss of consciousness.

Authors:  Lei Zhang; Shunqin Fan; Jiawei Zhang; Kun Fang; Lei Wang; Yuanyuan Cao; Lijian Chen; Xuesheng Liu; Erwei Gu
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2021-04-08       Impact factor: 2.217

4.  The Study of Intraoperative Consciousness after Tracheal Intubation.

Authors:  Leena Harshad Parate; Sandyarani D Channaiah; Geetha C Rajappa; Rahul Singh; Akshara Madhav; Mariam Mahdiyyah
Journal:  Anesth Essays Res       Date:  2018 Oct-Dec
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.