Literature DB >> 10817826

Separating the elements of habitat structure: independent effects of habitat complexity and structural components on rocky intertidal gastropods.

.   

Abstract

It has been difficult to understand the effects of habitat structure on assemblages because the different elements of habitat structure are often confounded. For example, few studies consider that the effects of structural components of a habitat (rocks, trees, pits, pneumatophores) may be separate from the complexity (e.g. surface area {SA}) they create. From prior observations and experiments, I developed three hypotheses about the effects of habitat structure on gastropods on rocky intertidal shores in Botany Bay, Australia. (1) The complexity of habitats positively affects the density and richness of gastropods. (2) The fractal dimension (D) represents elements of complexity that affect the density and richness of gastropods better than other indices of complexity. (3) The effects of specific structural components on the density and richness of gastropods are independent of their complexity. To test these hypotheses, treatments composed of pits and pneumatophores were used to independently manipulate complexity and structural components in experiments repeated at five different times on two shores. There was support for hypotheses (1) and (3) at most times and places but not for hypothesis (2). Richness, total density, and the densities of two of the three most common gastropods were greater in treatments with greater complexity. D was not definitively better than other indices of complexity, but D and SA were recommended for further consideration. When complexity was held constant, species richness and the density of most gastropods, except Austrocochlea porcata, was greater in treatments with pits than with pneumatophores. A common mechanistic explanation for the effects of habitat complexity on rocky intertidal gastropods relies on a specific characteristic of pits; they pool water and reduce desiccation stress. This assumption may be appropriate for many gastropods, but it was inappropriate for A. porcata. Habitat complexity affected its density, but this was not because of a characteristic specific to pits. The complexity and structural components of habitats have separate effects on assemblages, and it confuses the study of habitat structure to combine them.

Entities:  

Year:  2000        PMID: 10817826     DOI: 10.1016/s0022-0981(00)00171-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Mar Bio Ecol        ISSN: 0022-0981            Impact factor:   2.171


  12 in total

1.  Habitat structural complexity mediates the foraging success of multiple predator species.

Authors:  Danielle M Warfe; Leon A Barmuta
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2004-08-06       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Habitat structure, trophic structure and ecosystem function: interactive effects in a bromeliad-insect community.

Authors:  Diane S Srivastava
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2006-08-01       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Opportunistic predator prefers habitat complexity that exposes prey while reducing cannibalism and intraguild encounters.

Authors:  Jason M Schmidt; Ann L Rypstra
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2010-09-22       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Habitat context influences predator interference interactions and the strength of resource partitioning.

Authors:  A Randall Hughes; Jonathan H Grabowski
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2006-05-17       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Changes in habitat complexity negatively affect diverse gastropod assemblages in coralline algal turf.

Authors:  B P Kelaher
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2003-03-06       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  The role of habitat complexity in community development is mediated by resource availability.

Authors:  Rachel S Smith; Emma L Johnston; Graeme F Clark
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-07-23       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Abundance and Diversity of Crypto- and Necto-Benthic Coastal Fish Are Higher in Marine Forests than in Structurally Less Complex Macroalgal Assemblages.

Authors:  Pierre D Thiriet; Antonio Di Franco; Adrien Cheminée; Paolo Guidetti; Olivier Bianchimani; Solène Basthard-Bogain; Jean-Michel Cottalorda; Hazel Arceo; Joan Moranta; Pierre Lejeune; Patrice Francour; Luisa Mangialajo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-10-19       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Plant structural complexity and mechanical defenses mediate predator-prey interactions in an odonate-bird system.

Authors:  Patrick Grof-Tisza; Eric LoPresti; Sacha K Heath; Richard Karban
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2017-02-10       Impact factor: 2.912

9.  Contrasting fish behavior in artificial seascapes with implications for resources conservation.

Authors:  Barbara Koeck; Josep Alós; Anthony Caro; Reda Neveu; Romain Crec'hriou; Gilles Saragoni; Philippe Lenfant
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-07-30       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Decoupling the response of an estuarine shrimp to architectural components of habitat structure.

Authors:  Jeffrey A Crooks; Andrew L Chang; Gregory M Ruiz
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2016-08-02       Impact factor: 2.984

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.