Literature DB >> 10817793

Recruitment of patients with lung cancer into a randomised clinical trial: experience at two centres. On behalf of the Big Lung Trial Steering Committee.

S G Spiro1, N H Gower, M T Evans, F M Facchini, R M Rudd.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The entry of patients into randomised clinical trials (RCTs) in lung cancer is low. A study was undertaken to assess the reasons why patients with non-small cell lung cancer did not enter a trial involving randomisation to receive or not receive three courses of cisplatin based chemotherapy in addition to primary treatment by surgery, radiotherapy, or best supportive care.
METHODS: The study was carried out in two large London institutions with a special interest in recruiting patients to lung cancer trials. Patients recently diagnosed as having non-small cell lung cancer were prospectively identified and followed to see whether they entered the RCT and, if not, to identify the main reasons why.
RESULTS: Six hundred and eighty eight patients newly diagnosed with non-small cell lung cancer were identified between November 1995 and July 1998; 274 (39.8%) were deemed ineligible for the RCT for clinical reasons, most frequently their general condition rendering them unfit for chemotherapy. Another 161 (23.4%) were ineligible for logistical reasons-for example, they were discharged to centres not participating in the RCT or they were not considered for the trial at an appropriate time in their management. Of 253 potentially eligible patients, only 63 (24.9% of those eligible) agreed to enter the RCT and four entered another study. Of those who did not enter, 77 (41.4%) declined without stating a reason, 61 (32.8%) did not want chemotherapy, and only eight (4.3%) expressed a wish to have chemotherapy.
CONCLUSIONS: Despite considerable time and effort, the proportion of patients recruited was small (9.2%). Many seen were ineligible but, of 253 potentially eligible patients, 186 (73.5%) refused to enter the RCT.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10817793      PMCID: PMC1745775          DOI: 10.1136/thorax.55.6.463

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Thorax        ISSN: 0040-6376            Impact factor:   9.139


  13 in total

1.  Recruitment to a prospective breast conservation trial: why are so few patients randomised?

Authors:  W J Jack; U Chetty; A Rodger
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1990-07-14

2.  Conducting clinical research in the new NHS: the model of cancer. United Kingdom Coordinating Committee on Cancer Research.

Authors:  J F Smyth; J Mossman; R Hall; S Hepburn; R Pinkerton; M Richards; N Thatcher; J Box
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1994-08-13

3.  Physicians' reasons for not entering eligible patients in a randomized clinical trial of surgery for breast cancer.

Authors:  K M Taylor; R G Margolese; C L Soskolne
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1984-05-24       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Entry into clinical trials in breast cancer: the importance of specialist teams. Scottish Breast Cancer Focus Group and Scottish Cancer Therapy Network.

Authors:  C J Twelves; C S Thomson; J Young; A Gould
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 9.162

5.  The impact of clinical trials on the treatment of lung cancer.

Authors:  R Stephens; D Gibson
Journal:  Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol)       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 4.126

6.  Informed consent for investigational chemotherapy: patients' and physicians' perceptions.

Authors:  D T Penman; J C Holland; G F Bahna; G Morrow; A H Schmale; L R Derogatis; C L Carnrike; R Cherry
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1984-07       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Information and participation preferences among cancer patients.

Authors:  B R Cassileth; R V Zupkis; K Sutton-Smith; V March
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1980-06       Impact factor: 25.391

8.  Attitudes to chemotherapy: comparing views of patients with cancer with those of doctors, nurses, and general public.

Authors:  M L Slevin; L Stubbs; H J Plant; P Wilson; W M Gregory; P J Armes; S M Downer
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1990-06-02

9.  Volunteers or victims: patients' views of randomised cancer clinical trials.

Authors:  M Slevin; J Mossman; A Bowling; R Leonard; W Steward; P Harper; M McIllmurray; N Thatcher
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  The selection of cases for randomised trials: a registry survey of concurrent trial and non-trial patients. The British Stomach Cancer Group.

Authors:  L C Ward; J W Fielding; J A Dunn; K A Kelly
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  8 in total

1.  Treatment of acute otitis media: are children entered into clinical trials representative?

Authors:  J Bain
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 5.386

Review 2.  Carcinoma of the bronchus 60 years later.

Authors:  G A Silvestri; S G Spiro
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 9.139

3.  Depression in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.

Authors:  Nazem Atassi; Amanda Cook; Cristiana M E Pineda; Padmaja Yerramilli-Rao; Darlene Pulley; Merit Cudkowicz
Journal:  Amyotroph Lateral Scler       Date:  2010-11-24

4.  Discussions of cancer clinical trials with the National Cancer Institute's Cancer Information Service.

Authors:  Margaret M Byrne; Julie Kornfeld; Robin Vanderpool; Marc Belanger
Journal:  J Health Commun       Date:  2011-12-12

5.  Chemotherapy versus supportive care in advanced non-small cell lung cancer: improved survival without detriment to quality of life.

Authors:  S G Spiro; R M Rudd; R L Souhami; J Brown; D J Fairlamb; N H Gower; L Maslove; R Milroy; V Napp; M K B Parmar; M D Peake; R J Stephens; H Thorpe; D A Waller; P West
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 9.139

6.  Lung Cancer Pre-Diagnostic Pathways from First Presentation to Specialist Referral.

Authors:  Satya Rashi Khare; Sreenath Arekunnath Madathil; Gerald Batist; Isabelle Vedel
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2021-01-11       Impact factor: 3.677

7.  A randomized controlled trial of the effectiveness of a pre-recruitment primer letter to increase participation in a study of colorectal screening and surveillance.

Authors:  Christine Paul; Ryan Courtney; Rob Sanson-Fisher; Mariko Carey; David Hill; Jody Simmons; Shiho Rose
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2014-04-01       Impact factor: 4.615

8.  Identical chemotherapy schedules given on and off trial protocol in small cell lung cancer: response and survival results.

Authors:  J A Burgers; A Arance; L Ashcroft; J Hodgetts; L Lomax; N Thatcher
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2002-08-27       Impact factor: 7.640

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.