Literature DB >> 6737023

Informed consent for investigational chemotherapy: patients' and physicians' perceptions.

D T Penman, J C Holland, G F Bahna, G Morrow, A H Schmale, L R Derogatis, C L Carnrike, R Cherry.   

Abstract

One hundred forty-four patients and 68 physicians at three cancer centers were studied for their perceptions of the consent procedure, in which they participated one to three weeks earlier, for chemotherapy by one of 65 investigational protocols. Patients recalled the procedure positively and relied heavily on physician's advice. They felt most physicians wanted them to accept; 29% felt their participation in the decision was not encouraged. Primary reasons for accepting were trust in the physician, belief the treatment would help, and fear the disease (viewed as highly serious) would get worse without it. Nearly a fourth did not recall the information given that treatment was investigational. The consent form played no role in decision-making for 69%. Physicians believed therapeutic benefits would exceed potential problems for most patients; they viewed 41% of the patients as less than eager for details of treatment, a third as avoiding the seriousness of the discussion, and a third as passive in decision-making. The perceptual set of both parties places inadvertent constraint on patients' autonomy in decision making.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biomedical and Behavioral Research; Empirical Approach

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6737023     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.1984.2.7.849

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  45 in total

Review 1.  The promise of empirical research in the study of informed consent theory and practice.

Authors:  Laura A Siminoff; Marie Caputo; Christopher Burant
Journal:  HEC Forum       Date:  2004-03

2.  [Motivation of patients to participate in clinical trials. An explorative survey].

Authors:  Charly Gaul; Annett Malcherczyk; Thomas Schmidt; Jürgen Helm; Johannes Haerting
Journal:  Med Klin (Munich)       Date:  2010-02-20

3.  Therapeutic optimism in the consent forms of phase 1 gene transfer trials: an empirical analysis.

Authors:  J Kimmelman; N Palmour
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 2.903

Review 4.  Emerging empirical evidence on the ethics of schizophrenia research.

Authors:  Laura B Dunn; Philip J Candilis; Laura Weiss Roberts
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2005-10-19       Impact factor: 9.306

Review 5.  The quality of informed consent: mapping the landscape. A review of empirical data from developing and developed countries.

Authors:  Amulya Mandava; Christine Pace; Benjamin Campbell; Ezekiel Emanuel; Christine Grady
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2012-02-07       Impact factor: 2.903

Review 6.  The ethics of randomised controlled trials from the perspectives of patients, the public, and healthcare professionals.

Authors:  S J Edwards; R J Lilford; J Hewison
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-10-31

7.  Identifying patient information needs about cancer clinical trials using a Question Prompt List.

Authors:  Richard F Brown; Elyse Shuk; Phyllis Butow; Shawna Edgerson; Martin H N Tattersall; Jamie S Ostroff
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2010-08-02

8.  Enhancing decision making about participation in cancer clinical trials: development of a question prompt list.

Authors:  Richard F Brown; Elyse Shuk; Natasha Leighl; Phyllis Butow; Jamie Ostroff; Shawna Edgerson; Martin Tattersall
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2010-07-01       Impact factor: 3.603

9.  Improving informed consent with minority participants: results from researcher and community surveys.

Authors:  Sandra Crouse Quinn; Mary A Garza; James Butler; Craig S Fryer; Erica T Casper; Stephen B Thomas; David Barnard; Kevin H Kim
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 1.742

10.  Why is recruitment to trials difficult? An investigation into recruitment difficulties in an RCT of supported employment in patients with severe mental illness.

Authors:  Louise Howard; Isabel de Salis; Zelda Tomlin; Graham Thornicroft; Jenny Donovan
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2008-07-31       Impact factor: 2.226

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.