Literature DB >> 10813130

Prognostic value of microscopic peritoneal dissemination: comparison between colon and gastric cancer.

P Vogel1, J Rüschoff, S Kümmel, H Zirngibl, F Hofstädter, W Hohenberger, K W Jauch.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We evaluated the incidence and prognostic relevance of microscopic intraperitoneal tumor cell dissemination of colon cancer in comparison with dissemination of gastric cancer as a rational for additive intraperitoneal therapy.
METHODS: Peritoneal washouts of 90 patients with colon and 111 patients with gastric cancer were investigated prospectively. Sixty patients with benign diseases and 8 patients with histologically proven gross visible peritoneal carcinomatosis served as controls. Intraoperatively, 100 ml of warm NaCl 0.9 percent were instilled and 20 ml were reaspirated. In all patients hematoxylin and eosin staining (conventional cytology) was performed. Additionally, in 36 patients with colon cancer and 47 patients with gastric cancer, immunostaining with the HEA-125 antibody (immunocytology) was prepared. The results of cytology were assessed for an association with TNM category and cancer grade, based on all patients, and with patient survival, among the R0 resected patients.
RESULTS: In conventional cytology 35.5 percent (32/90) of patients with colon cancer and 42.3 percent (47/111) of patients with gastric cancer had a positive cytology. In immunocytology 47.2 percent (17/36) of patients with colon cancer and 46.8 percent (22/47) of patients with gastric cancer were positive. In colon cancer, positive conventional cytology was associated with pT and M category (P = 0.044 and P = 0.0002), whereas immunocytology was only associated with M category (P = 0.007). No association was found between nodal status and immunocytology in colon cancer and with the grading. There was a statistically significant correlation between pT M category and conventional and immunocytology in gastric cancer (P < 0.0015/P = 0.007 and P < 0.001/P = 0.009, respectively). Positive immunocytology was additionally associated with pN category (P = 0.05). In a univariate analysis of R0 resected patients (no residual tumor), positive immunocytology was significantly related to an unfavorable prognosis in patients with gastric cancer only (n = 30). Mean survival time was significantly increased in patients with gastric cancer with negative cytology compared with positive cytology (1,205 (standard error of the mean, 91) vs. 771 (standard error of the mean, 147) days; P = 0.007) but not in patients with colon cancer (1,215 (standard error of the mean, 95) vs. 1,346 (standard error of the mean, 106) days; P = 0.55).
CONCLUSIONS: Because microscopic peritoneal dissemination influences survival time after R0 resections only in patients with gastric but not with colon cancer, our results may provide a basis for a decision on additive, prophylactic (intraperitoneal) therapy in gastric but not colon cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10813130     DOI: 10.1007/bf02237250

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum        ISSN: 0012-3706            Impact factor:   4.585


  20 in total

Review 1.  [Minimal residual tumor in gastrointestinal carcinoma. Relevance to prognosis and oncologic surgical consequences].

Authors:  S Gretschel; A Bembenek; T Schulze; W Kemmner; P M Schlag
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 0.955

2.  Prognostic significance of peritoneal lavage cytology in patients with colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Hirotoshi Kobayashi; Kenjiro Kotake; Kenichi Sugihara
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-02-28       Impact factor: 3.402

3.  Impact of positive intraabdominal lavage cytology on the long-term prognosis of colorectal cancer patients.

Authors:  Rita Temesi; László Sikorszki; János Bezsilla; Akos Botos; Judit Kovács; Tibor Tihanyi
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  Positive Peritoneal Lavage Cytology -Implications for Staging and Management of Gastric Cancer.

Authors:  Suman B Koganti; Satish Boddepalli; Muralidhar Nambada; Venu Madhav Thumma; Bheerappa Nagari; R A Sastry
Journal:  Indian J Surg Oncol       Date:  2016-05-06

Review 5.  Intra-operative peritoneal lavage for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Guillaume Passot; Kayvan Mohkam; Eddy Cotte; Olivier Glehen
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-02-28       Impact factor: 5.742

6.  Is ascites CEA a risk factor for peritoneal carcinomatosis in colorectal cancer?: a long-term follow-up study.

Authors:  Byung Chul Kim; Jung Hoon Bae; Sun Min Park; Dae Youn Won; In Kyu Lee
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2019-12-05       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 7.  Incidence and prognostic significance of positive peritoneal lavage in colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Takeshi Nishikawa; Eiji Sunami; Toshiaki Tanaka; Junichiro Tanaka; Tomomitsu Kiyomatsu; Kazushige Kawai; Keisuke Hata; Shinsuke Kazama; Hiroaki Nozawa; Soichiro Ishihara; Toshiaki Watanabe
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2014-11-07       Impact factor: 2.549

8.  A feasibility study of sequential paclitaxel and S-1 (PTX/S-1) chemotherapy as postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy for advanced gastric cancer.

Authors:  Michiya Kobayashi; Akira Tsuburaya; Naoki Nagata; Yumi Miyashita; Koji Oba; Junichi Sakamoto
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 7.370

9.  Comparative analysis of intraperitoneal minimal free cancer cells between colorectal and gastric cancer patients using quantitative RT-PCR: possible reason for rare peritoneal recurrence in colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Masayasu Hara; Hayao Nakanishi; Qian Jun; Yukihide Kanemitsu; Seiji Ito; Yoshinari Mochizuki; Yoshitaka Yamamura; Yasuhiro Kodera; Masae Tatematsu; Takashi Hirai; Tomoyuki Kato
Journal:  Clin Exp Metastasis       Date:  2007-05-09       Impact factor: 5.150

10.  Evaluation of intraperitoneal lavage cytology before colorectal cancer resection.

Authors:  Shoichi Fujii; Hiroshi Shimada; Shigeru Yamagishi; Mitsuyoshi Ota; Chikara Kunisaki; Hideyuki Ike; Yasushi Ichikawa
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2009-05-28       Impact factor: 2.571

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.