Literature DB >> 10810154

Evaluation of protein-protein association energies by free energy perturbation calculations.

B O Brandsdal1, A O Smalås.   

Abstract

The association energy upon binding of different amino acids in the specificity pocket of trypsin was evaluated by free energy perturbation calculations on complexes between bovine trypsin (BT) and bovine pancreatic trypsin inhibitor (BPTI). Three simulations of mutations of the primary binding residue (P(1)) were performed (P(1)-Ala to Gly, P(1)-Met to Gly and P(1)-Met to Ala) and the resulting differences in association energy (DeltaDeltaG(a)) are 2. 28, 5.08 and 2.93 kcal/mol for P(1)-Ala to Gly, P(1)-Met to Gly and to Ala with experimental values of 1.71, 4.62 and 2.91 kcal/mol, respectively. The calculated binding free energy differences are hence in excellent agreement with the experimental binding free energies. The binding free energies, however, were shown to be highly dependent on water molecules at the protein-protein interface and could only be quantitatively estimated if the correct number of such water molecules was included. Furthermore, the cavities that were formed when a large amino acid side-chain is perturbed to a smaller one seem to create instabilities in the systems and had to be refilled with water molecules in order to obtain reliable results. In addition, if the protein atoms that were perturbed away were not replaced by water molecules, the simulations dramatically overestimated the initial state of the free energy perturbations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10810154     DOI: 10.1093/protein/13.4.239

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Protein Eng        ISSN: 0269-2139


  8 in total

1.  AB-Bind: Antibody binding mutational database for computational affinity predictions.

Authors:  Sarah Sirin; James R Apgar; Eric M Bennett; Amy E Keating
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2015-11-06       Impact factor: 6.725

2.  Absolute binding free energy calculations using molecular dynamics simulations with restraining potentials.

Authors:  Jiyao Wang; Yuqing Deng; Benoît Roux
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2006-07-14       Impact factor: 4.033

3.  Computational analysis of binding of P1 variants to trypsin.

Authors:  B O Brandsdal; J Aqvist; A O Smalås
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 6.725

4.  Free-energy simulations reveal that both hydrophobic and polar interactions are important for influenza hemagglutinin antibody binding.

Authors:  Zhen Xia; Tien Huynh; Seung-gu Kang; Ruhong Zhou
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2012-03-20       Impact factor: 4.033

5.  Hotspots in an obligate homodimeric anticancer target. Structural and functional effects of interfacial mutations in human thymidylate synthase.

Authors:  Outi M H Salo-Ahen; Anna Tochowicz; Cecilia Pozzi; Daniela Cardinale; Stefania Ferrari; Yap Boum; Stefano Mangani; Robert M Stroud; Puneet Saxena; Hannu Myllykallio; Maria Paola Costi; Glauco Ponterini; Rebecca C Wade
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2015-04-01       Impact factor: 7.446

6.  Structural consequences of hereditary spastic paraplegia disease-related mutations in kinesin.

Authors:  Mandira Dutta; Michael R Diehl; José N Onuchic; Biman Jana
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-10-26       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  The scoring of poses in protein-protein docking: current capabilities and future directions.

Authors:  Iain H Moal; Mieczyslaw Torchala; Paul A Bates; Juan Fernández-Recio
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2013-10-01       Impact factor: 3.169

8.  Protein-Protein Binding as a Two-Step Mechanism: Preselection of Encounter Poses during the Binding of BPTI and Trypsin.

Authors:  Ursula Kahler; Anna S Kamenik; Franz Waibl; Johannes Kraml; Klaus R Liedl
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2020-07-10       Impact factor: 3.699

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.