Literature DB >> 10809034

Epidemiology of de novo acute renal failure in hospitalized African Americans: comparing community-acquired vs hospital-acquired disease.

C I Obialo1, E C Okonofua, A S Tayade, L J Riley.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The high incidence and prevalence of end-stage kidney disease among African Americans is well known, but the epidemiology of acute renal failure (ARF) among African Americans is unknown. This study was designed to determine the incidence, associated risk factors, and prognosis of ARF in hospitalized African Americans and to compare these variables in hospital-acquired ARF (HA-ARF) against community-acquired ARF (CA-ARF).
METHODS: A 3-year (1994-1996), computer-assisted retrospective analysis of hospital discharges with confirmed diagnoses of ARF. One hundred of 240 cases met the inclusion criteria for de novo ARF. Demographic, laboratory, and clinical profiles of all patients were retrieved and subdivided into CA-ARF and HA-ARF. Both analysis of variance and chi2 tests were used for analysis. Survival regression used both the Cox proportional hazards and Kaplan-Meier models.
RESULTS: The incidence of CA-ARF was 3.5 times greater than that of HA-ARF (0.55% vs 0.15%). The mean age of all patients was 54 years with a 67% male predominance. There were no significant differences in age, sex, peak serum creatinine levels, or underlying medical history. Prerenal causes of ARF were more common among CA-ARF than HA-ARF (35% vs 19%; P = .07), but intra-renal causes were more common among HA-ARF (81% vs 55%; P = .07). All cases of obstruction occurred in CA-ARF. Mortality was higher in HA-ARF (59% vs 33%; P = .03), and the incidence of recognized predictors of mortality was higher in patients with HA-ARF than in those with CA-ARF: oliguria (59% vs 35%; P = .04); sepsis (73% vs 35%; P = .004); stay in the intensive care unit (ICU) or mechanical ventilation (55% vs 6%; P<.001); and multiorgan failure (59% vs 24%; P = .002). Those with HA-ARF were twice as likely to require dialysis as those with CA-ARF. The mortality was high in younger patients with CA-ARF and in older patients with HA-ARF, but the dialysis-related mortality rate was 3-fold higher among patients with HA-ARF. While mean +/- SD length of hospital stay was more prolonged in HA-ARF than CA-ARF (26 +/- 28 days vs 12 +/- 11 days; P<.001), the 120-day survival rate was lower in HA-ARF than CA-ARF (43% vs 66%; P = .05). The HA-ARF status was associated with a relative risk of 2.5 (confidence interval, 1.1-5.5; P = .03) for shortened survival.
CONCLUSIONS: The overall epidemiologic characteristics of ARF among hospitalized African Americans seem to be comparable to those in whites, but the difference in incidence between CA-ARF and HA-ARF was much higher in African Americans. In view of the high mortality and morbidity rates associated with ARF and the fact that younger African American patients with CA-ARF were more likely to die than their older counterparts, we recommend that renal failure awareness be incorporated into community-based health educational programs in African American populations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10809034     DOI: 10.1001/archinte.160.9.1309

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-9926


  24 in total

1.  Referral patterns and outcomes in noncritically ill patients with hospital-acquired acute kidney injury.

Authors:  Pascal Meier; Rachel Meier Bonfils; Bruno Vogt; Bernard Burnand; Michel Burnier
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2011-08-04       Impact factor: 8.237

2.  Identification of diagnostic urinary biomarkers for acute kidney injury.

Authors:  Sanju A Varghese; Thomas B Powell; Michael G Janech; Milos N Budisavljevic; Romesh C Stanislaus; Jonas S Almeida; John M Arthur
Journal:  J Investig Med       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 3.  Mediators of inflammation in acute kidney injury.

Authors:  Ali Akcay; Quocan Nguyen; Charles L Edelstein
Journal:  Mediators Inflamm       Date:  2010-02-21       Impact factor: 4.711

Review 4.  Linking acute kidney injury to chronic kidney disease: the missing links.

Authors:  Mohammed A Kaballo; Mohamed E Elsayed; Austin G Stack
Journal:  J Nephrol       Date:  2016-12-07       Impact factor: 3.902

5.  Acute Kidney Injury in the Era of the AKI E-Alert.

Authors:  Jennifer Holmes; Timothy Rainer; John Geen; Gethin Roberts; Kate May; Nick Wilson; John D Williams; Aled O Phillips
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2016-10-28       Impact factor: 8.237

6.  Clinical outcomes of acute kidney injury developing outside the hospital in elderly.

Authors:  K Turgutalp; S Bardak; M Horoz; I Helvacı; S Demir; A A Kiykim
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2016-10-04       Impact factor: 2.370

Review 7.  The Japanese clinical practice guideline for acute kidney injury 2016.

Authors:  Kent Doi; Osamu Nishida; Takashi Shigematsu; Tomohito Sadahiro; Noritomo Itami; Kunitoshi Iseki; Yukio Yuzawa; Hirokazu Okada; Daisuke Koya; Hideyasu Kiyomoto; Yugo Shibagaki; Kenichi Matsuda; Akihiko Kato; Terumasa Hayashi; Tomonari Ogawa; Tatsuo Tsukamoto; Eisei Noiri; Shigeo Negi; Koichi Kamei; Hirotsugu Kitayama; Naoki Kashihara; Toshiki Moriyama; Yoshio Terada
Journal:  Clin Exp Nephrol       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 2.801

Review 8.  Therapeutic and predictive targets of AKI.

Authors:  R Yalavarthy; C L Edelstein
Journal:  Clin Nephrol       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 0.975

Review 9.  Acute kidney injury in the elderly population.

Authors:  Rahmi Yilmaz; Yunus Erdem
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2009-08-26       Impact factor: 2.370

10.  Acute kidney injury in statin initiators.

Authors:  J Bradley Layton; M Alan Brookhart; Michele Jonsson Funk; Ross J Simpson; Virginia Pate; Til Stürmer; Abhijit V Kshirsagar
Journal:  Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf       Date:  2013-08-20       Impact factor: 2.890

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.