Literature DB >> 10807128

Osteoporosis and implant failure: an exploratory case-control study.

W Becker1, P P Hujoel, B E Becker, H Willingham.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Osteoporosis has been suggested as a risk factor for implant failure, but data supporting such a link are limited.
METHODS: A case-control study was designed to evaluate the association between osteoporosis and dental implant failure. Cases (n = 49) and controls (n = 49) were selected from a private practice. The following measures were collected for each patient: 1) peripheral dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (pDEXA) bone measurements at the distal and proximal radius and ulna; 2) classification of bone quality and quantity at the time of implant placement; and 3) questionnaire data regarding potentially confounding variables. Generalized estimating equations were used to relate the likelihood of having at least one implant failure in an individual to osteoporosis measures.
RESULTS: The results suggested that there was no association between pDEXA scores at the radius and ulna and the risk for implant failure. For every 1-unit increase in bone density as measured by pDEXA t-score at proximal and distal radius and ulna, the risk for a patient to lose at least one implant changed by +14% and -6%, respectively (odds ratio, 1.14; 95% confidence interval, 0.80-1.62 and odds ratio, 0.94; 95% confidence interval, 0.71-1.23). The simple visual assessment of local bone quality had a moderately sized relationship to implant failure. Implants placed in sites with thin cortical bone increased the chance for a patient to lose at least one implant by 130% when compared to implants placed in a thick cortical layer or compact bone (odds ratio, 2.3; 95% confidence interval, 1.0-5.4).
CONCLUSIONS: This exploratory study suggests that a simple visual assessment of bone quality at the site of implant placement may be more informative regarding implant failure than pDEXA bone density measures obtained at peripheral bones. In order to determine whether peripheral osteoporosis measurements have a small or moderate association with implant loss, studies with larger sample sizes will be required.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10807128     DOI: 10.1902/jop.2000.71.4.625

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Periodontol        ISSN: 0022-3492            Impact factor:   6.993


  18 in total

1.  New biocomposite [biphasic calcium phosphate/ poly-DL-lactide-co-glycolide/biostimulative agent] filler for reconstruction of bone tissue changed by osteoporosis.

Authors:  N Ignjatovic; Z Ajdukovic; D Uskokovic
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 3.896

2.  Preservation and promotion of bone formation in the mandible as a response to a novel calcium-phosphate based biomaterial in mineral deficiency induced low bone mass male versus female rats.

Authors:  Kritika Srinivasan; Diana P Naula; Dindo Q Mijares; Malvin N Janal; Racquel Z LeGeros; Yu Zhang
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res A       Date:  2016-03-11       Impact factor: 4.396

3.  Impact of osteoporosis in dental implants: A systematic review.

Authors:  Gabriela Giro; Leandro Chambrone; Abrao Goldstein; Jose Augusto Rodrigues; Elton Zenóbio; Magda Feres; Luciene Cristina Figueiredo; Alessandra Cassoni; Jamil Awad Shibli
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2015-03-18

4.  Influence of estrogen deficiency on bone around osseointegrated dental implants: an experimental study in the rat jaw model.

Authors:  Gabriela Giro; Paulo G Coelho; Roberto Sales-Pessoa; Rosa Maria Rodrigues Pereira; Toshihisa Kawai; Silvana Regina Perez Orrico
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2011-04-29       Impact factor: 1.895

Review 5.  Significance of osteoporosis in craniomaxillofacial surgery: a review of the literature.

Authors:  B Hohlweg-Majert; R Schmelzeisen; B M Pfeiffer; E Schneider
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2005-07-16       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  Zoledronic acid enhances bone-implant osseointegration more than alendronate and strontium ranelate in ovariectomized rats.

Authors:  B Chen; Y Li; X Yang; H Xu; D Xie
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2013-02-07       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 7.  Pharmacologic augmentation of implant fixation in osteopenic bone.

Authors:  R D Ross; J L Hamilton; B M Wilson; D R Sumner; A S Virdi
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 5.096

Review 8.  Osteoporosis: Its Prosthodontic Considerations - A Review.

Authors:  Vinod Bandela; Bharathi Munagapati; Rajeev K Reddy Karnati; Giridhar Reddy Sirupa Venkata; Simhachalam Reddy Nidudhur
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2015-12-01

9.  Comparison of implant survival with implants placed in acceptable and compromised bone: a literature review.

Authors:  Stefan Ihde; Sigmar Kopp; Thomas Maier
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2009-06-10

10.  An Ultrasound Assisted Anchoring Technique (BoneWelding Technology) for Fixation of Implants to Bone - A Histological Pilot Study in Sheep.

Authors:  Jens D Langhoff; Jan M Kuemmerle; Joerg Mayer; Urs Weber; Milica Berra; Jessika M Mueller; Sabine B Kaestner; Katalin Zlinszky; Joerg A Auer; Brigitte von Rechenberg
Journal:  Open Orthop J       Date:  2009-06-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.