Literature DB >> 10806468

Diagnostic criteria for malingered neurocognitive dysfunction: proposed standards for clinical practice and research.

D J Slick1, E M Sherman, G L Iverson.   

Abstract

Over the past 10 years, widespread and concerted research efforts have led to increasingly sophisticated and efficient methods and instruments for detecting exaggeration or fabrication of cognitive dysfunction. Despite these psychometric advances, the process of diagnosing malingering remains difficult and largely idiosyncratic. This article presents a proposed set of diagnostic criteria that define psychometric, behavioral, and collateral data indicative of possible, probable, and definite malingering of cognitive dysfunction, for use in clinical practice and for defining populations for clinical research. Relevant literature is reviewed, and limitations and benefits of the proposed criteria are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10806468     DOI: 10.1076/1385-4046(199911)13:04;1-Y;FT545

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Neuropsychol        ISSN: 1385-4046            Impact factor:   3.535


  29 in total

Review 1.  Management of pediatric mild traumatic brain injury: a neuropsychological review from injury through recovery.

Authors:  Michael W Kirkwood; Keith Owen Yeates; H Gerry Taylor; Christopher Randolph; Michael McCrea; Vicki A Anderson
Journal:  Clin Neuropsychol       Date:  2007-09-01       Impact factor: 3.535

Review 2.  [Symptom and complaint validation of chronic pain in social medical evaluation. Part I: Terminological and methodological approaches].

Authors:  R Dohrenbusch
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 1.107

3.  White Matter and Cognitive Changes in Veterans Diagnosed with Alcoholism and PTSD.

Authors:  Arkadiy L Maksimovskiy; Regina E McGlinchey; Catherine B Fortier; David H Salat; William P Milberg; Marlene Oscar-Berman
Journal:  J Alcohol Drug Depend       Date:  2014-01-01

4.  RBANS Validity Indices: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Robert D Shura; Timothy W Brearly; Jared A Rowland; Sarah L Martindale; Holly M Miskey; Kevin Duff
Journal:  Neuropsychol Rev       Date:  2018-05-16       Impact factor: 7.444

5.  A 45-year-old woman referred for an independent medical evaluation by her insurer.

Authors:  Jason W Busse; Sturla E Bruun-Meyer; Shanil Ebrahim; Regina Kunz
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2014-09-08       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 6.  Test validity and performance validity: considerations in providing a framework for development of an ability-focused neuropsychological test battery.

Authors:  Glenn J Larrabee
Journal:  Arch Clin Neuropsychol       Date:  2014-10-03       Impact factor: 2.813

7.  The dangers of failing one or more performance validity tests in individuals claiming mild traumatic brain injury-related postconcussive symptoms.

Authors:  Daniel A Proto; Nicholas J Pastorek; Brian I Miller; Jennifer M Romesser; Anita H Sim; John F Linck
Journal:  Arch Clin Neuropsychol       Date:  2014-09-24       Impact factor: 2.813

8.  False-Positive Error Rates for Reliable Digit Span and Auditory Verbal Learning Test Performance Validity Measures in Amnestic Mild Cognitive Impairment and Early Alzheimer Disease.

Authors:  David W Loring; Felicia C Goldstein; Chuqing Chen; Daniel L Drane; James J Lah; Liping Zhao; Glenn J Larrabee
Journal:  Arch Clin Neuropsychol       Date:  2016-04-15       Impact factor: 2.813

Review 9.  Victoria Symptom Validity Test: A Systematic Review and Cross-Validation Study.

Authors:  Zachary J Resch; Troy A Webber; Matthew T Bernstein; Tasha Rhoads; Gabriel P Ovsiew; Jason R Soble
Journal:  Neuropsychol Rev       Date:  2021-01-12       Impact factor: 7.444

10.  Cumulative false positive rates given multiple performance validity tests: commentary on Davis and Millis (2014) and Larrabee (2014).

Authors:  Robert M Bilder; Catherine A Sugar; Gerhard S Hellemann
Journal:  Clin Neuropsychol       Date:  2014-12-10       Impact factor: 3.535

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.