Literature DB >> 10804269

Night-time roosting in laying hens and the effect of thwarting access to perches.

.   

Abstract

Free-living hens roost on branches in trees at night, and laying hens in aviary systems or cages provided with perches also make extensive use of these for night-time roosting. It is therefore suggested that roosting on perches is important to the hens and that domestic hens should be provided with perches in order to promote welfare. However, no study has addressed the question of motivation for roosting. In the present experiment, we studied undisturbed roosting behaviour and the reaction of commercial laying hens when roosting on perches was thwarted. Fifty-two adult hens (Lohmann Selected Leghorn, LSL) were kept in two groups of 26 hens in litter pens with perches at heights of 23, 43 and 63 cm. Behaviour was observed for 60 min starting at lights-off, registering the number of hens on each perch level. The hens started to get onto the perch immediately and within 10 min after lights-off, more than 90% of the hens were on the perch. All hens roosted close together on the top perch. In a second experiment, 24 hens were kept in eight groups of three birds each in experimental pens equipped with perches. Birds were tested in four different situations: (1) the pen unchanged (Base), (2) the perch covered with plexiglass (PCov), (3) the perch removed (PRem) and (4) the unchanged pen (Post). The order of PCov and PRem alternated between groups in a balanced manner and all groups of birds experienced all four treatments. The hens were observed for 60 min from lights-off using focal sampling. For comparisons, the Post treatment served as the control. In the treatments where perching was not possible, the hens spent less time sitting (p=0.042), and also tended to spend more time standing (p=0.06), than in the control. Furthermore, the hens moved more (p=0.042) when the perch was inaccessible, and when the perch was visible but inaccessible they also showed more attempts to take off (p=0.042). These findings can be interpreted as increased frustration and/or exploration, probably to find an alternative roosting site. Together with the high use of perches for night-time roosting under undisturbed conditions, these results indicate that laying hens are motivated to perch and imply that hens kept under conditions where perching is not possible may experience reduced welfare.

Entities:  

Year:  2000        PMID: 10804269     DOI: 10.1016/s0168-1591(00)00097-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Anim Behav Sci        ISSN: 0168-1591            Impact factor:   2.448


  19 in total

1.  Effects of ground robot manipulation on hen floor egg reduction, production performance, stress response, bone quality, and behavior.

Authors:  Guoming Li; Xue Hui; Yang Zhao; Wei Zhai; Joseph L Purswell; Zach Porter; Sabin Poudel; Linan Jia; Bo Zhang; Gary D Chesser
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-04-22       Impact factor: 3.752

2.  General behaviors and perching behaviors of laying hens in cages with different colored perches.

Authors:  D H Chen; J Bao
Journal:  Asian-Australas J Anim Sci       Date:  2012-05-01       Impact factor: 2.509

3.  Soft perches in an aviary system reduce incidence of keel bone damage in laying hens.

Authors:  Ariane Stratmann; Ernst K F Fröhlich; Alexandra Harlander-Matauschek; Lars Schrader; Michael J Toscano; Hanno Würbel; Sabine G Gebhardt-Henrich
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-03-26       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Behavioral Differences of Laying Hens with Fractured Keel Bones within Furnished Cages.

Authors:  Teresa M Casey-Trott; Tina M Widowski
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2016-05-31

5.  Space use by 4 strains of laying hens to perch, wing flap, dust bathe, stand and lie down.

Authors:  Elizabeth R Riddle; Ahmed B A Ali; Dana L M Campbell; Janice M Siegford
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-01-05       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  A Decade of Progress toward Ending the Intensive Confinement of Farm Animals in the United States.

Authors:  Sara Shields; Paul Shapiro; Andrew Rowan
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2017-05-15       Impact factor: 2.752

7.  The Effect of Cooled Perches on Immunological Parameters of Caged White Leghorn Hens during the Hot Summer Months.

Authors:  Rebecca A Strong; Patricia Y Hester; Susan D Eicher; Jiaying Hu; Heng-Wei Cheng
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-10-23       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Perch use by laying hens in a commercial aviary.

Authors:  D L M Campbell; M M Makagon; J C Swanson; J M Siegford
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2016-03-18       Impact factor: 3.352

9.  Multiple behavioural, morphological and cognitive developmental changes arise from a single alteration to early life spatial environment, resulting in fitness consequences for released pheasants.

Authors:  Mark A Whiteside; Rufus Sage; Joah R Madden
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2016-03-23       Impact factor: 2.963

Review 10.  The Influence of Keel Bone Damage on Welfare of Laying Hens.

Authors:  Anja B Riber; Teresa M Casey-Trott; Mette S Herskin
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2018-02-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.