S Kanamitsu1, K Ito, Y Sugiyama. 1. Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Tokyo, Japan.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To assess the degree to which the maximum unbound concentration of inhibitor at the inlet to the liver (I(inlet,u,max), used in the prediction of drug-drug interactions, overestimates the unbound concentration in the liver. METHODS: The estimated value of I(inlet,u,max) was compared with the unbound concentrations in systemic blood, liver, and inlet to the liver, obtained in a simulation study based on a physiological flow model. As an example, a tolbutamide/sulfaphenazole interaction was predicted taking the plasma concentration profile of the inhibitor into consideration. RESULTS: The value of I(inlet,u,max) differed from the concentration in each compartment, depending on the intrinsic metabolic clearance in the liver, first-order absorption rate constant, non-hepatic clearance and liver-to-blood concentration ratio (Kp) of the inhibitor. The AUC of tolbutamide was predicted to increase 4-fold when co-administered with sulfaphenazole, which agreed well with in vivo observations and was comparable with the predictions based on a fixed value of I(inlet,u,max). The blood concentration of tolbutamide was predicted to increase when it was co-administered with as little as 1/100 of the clinical dose of sulfaphenazole. CONCLUSIONS: Although I(inlet,u,max) overestimated the unbound concentration in the liver, the tolbutamide/sulfaphenazole interaction could be successfully predicted by using a fixed value of I(inlet,u,max) indicating that the unbound concentration of sulfaphenazole in the liver after its clinical dose is by far larger than the concentration to inhibit CYP2C9-mediated metabolism and that care should be taken when it is co-administered with drugs that are substrates of CYP2C9.
PURPOSE: To assess the degree to which the maximum unbound concentration of inhibitor at the inlet to the liver (I(inlet,u,max), used in the prediction of drug-drug interactions, overestimates the unbound concentration in the liver. METHODS: The estimated value of I(inlet,u,max) was compared with the unbound concentrations in systemic blood, liver, and inlet to the liver, obtained in a simulation study based on a physiological flow model. As an example, a tolbutamide/sulfaphenazole interaction was predicted taking the plasma concentration profile of the inhibitor into consideration. RESULTS: The value of I(inlet,u,max) differed from the concentration in each compartment, depending on the intrinsic metabolic clearance in the liver, first-order absorption rate constant, non-hepatic clearance and liver-to-blood concentration ratio (Kp) of the inhibitor. The AUC of tolbutamide was predicted to increase 4-fold when co-administered with sulfaphenazole, which agreed well with in vivo observations and was comparable with the predictions based on a fixed value of I(inlet,u,max). The blood concentration of tolbutamide was predicted to increase when it was co-administered with as little as 1/100 of the clinical dose of sulfaphenazole. CONCLUSIONS: Although I(inlet,u,max) overestimated the unbound concentration in the liver, the tolbutamide/sulfaphenazole interaction could be successfully predicted by using a fixed value of I(inlet,u,max) indicating that the unbound concentration of sulfaphenazole in the liver after its clinical dose is by far larger than the concentration to inhibit CYP2C9-mediated metabolism and that care should be taken when it is co-administered with drugs that are substrates of CYP2C9.
Authors: L L von Moltke; D J Greenblatt; J Schmider; C E Wright; J S Harmatz; R I Shader Journal: Biochem Pharmacol Date: 1998-01-15 Impact factor: 5.858
Authors: Kathleen M Giacomini; Shiew-Mei Huang; Donald J Tweedie; Leslie Z Benet; Kim L R Brouwer; Xiaoyan Chu; Amber Dahlin; Raymond Evers; Volker Fischer; Kathleen M Hillgren; Keith A Hoffmaster; Toshihisa Ishikawa; Dietrich Keppler; Richard B Kim; Caroline A Lee; Mikko Niemi; Joseph W Polli; Yuichi Sugiyama; Peter W Swaan; Joseph A Ware; Stephen H Wright; Sook Wah Yee; Maciej J Zamek-Gliszczynski; Lei Zhang Journal: Nat Rev Drug Discov Date: 2010-03 Impact factor: 84.694
Authors: Verawan Uchaipichat; Leanne K Winner; Peter I Mackenzie; David J Elliot; J Andrew Williams; John O Miners Journal: Br J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2006-04 Impact factor: 4.335