Literature DB >> 10799836

Telomerase: a therapeutic target for the third millennium?

F Lavelle1, J F Riou, A Laoui, P Mailliet.   

Abstract

Telomerase offers the potential opportunity to control cell proliferation by interfering with a totally new and unique biological process which is cell senescence. The aim of this review is to impartially present the state of the art in telomerase with the pros and the cons of the current scientific situation of this fast-growing and fascinating topic for answering the key question asked by experimental and medical oncologists: Will telomerase be a therapeutic target for the third millenium? The most convincing argument (which is a scientifically documented one) for going ahead with this target is obviously the strong correlation existing between the level and frequency of telomerase expression and the malignant properties of tumors. This has been now largely documented in established tumor cell lines and fresh tumor samples obtained from patients. Noteworthy is the very important difference of telomerase expression between malignant and normal tissues. This difference is much higher than those observed for classical enzymatic targets of chemotherapy such as thymidylate synthetase, dihydrofolate reductase and topoisomerases. If this translates to the clinical situation, telomerase inhibitors might display a good selectivity for tumor cells with a minimal toxicity for normal tissues. The most appealing criticism (which is still purely speculative) is obviously the clinical relevance of inhibiting telomerase in cancer patients. According to the paradigm currently proposed for telomeres and telomerases, it can be predicted that telomerase inhibition will not affect a tumor until its telomeres reach the critical size for entering senescence. This means that during anti-telomerase therapy, the tumor cells will continue grow undergoing 20-30 divisions until the telomeres reach a critical size leading to tumor senescence. Does this make sense, especially in patients with advanced tumors at the beginning of the therapy? Ultimately, the definitive answer to the question will not come from intellectual speculation but from the properties of telomerase inhibitors, first in tumor bearing animals, then finally in cancer patients! Several institutions are very active in the development of telomerase inhibitors. Different stategies are used: direct inhibition of telomerase, interference with telomeres (G quartets), interaction with other proteins involved in the regulation of telomerase and telomeres.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10799836     DOI: 10.1016/s1040-8428(00)00057-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Rev Oncol Hematol        ISSN: 1040-8428            Impact factor:   6.312


  11 in total

1.  ESI mass spectrometric exploration of selective recognition of G-quadruplex in c-myb oncogene promoter using a novel flexible cyclic polyamide.

Authors:  Xiaojie Cui; Qiang Zhang; Han Chen; Jiang Zhou; Gu Yuan
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2014-01-23       Impact factor: 3.109

2.  Biophysical and biological properties of quadruplex oligodeoxyribonucleotides.

Authors:  Virna Dapić; Vedra Abdomerović; Rachel Marrington; Jemma Peberdy; Alison Rodger; John O Trent; Paula J Bates
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2003-04-15       Impact factor: 16.971

3.  Properties of a telomerase-specific Cre/Lox switch for transcriptionally targeted cancer gene therapy.

Authors:  Alan E Bilsland; Aileen Fletcher-Monaghan; W Nicol Keith
Journal:  Neoplasia       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 5.715

Review 4.  Synthesis of indole derivatives as prevalent moieties present in selected alkaloids.

Authors:  Majid M Heravi; Zahra Amiri; Kosar Kafshdarzadeh; Vahideh Zadsirjan
Journal:  RSC Adv       Date:  2021-10-15       Impact factor: 4.036

5.  Single molecule force spectroscopy on G-quadruplex DNA.

Authors:  Susanna Lynch; Heather Baker; Sarah G Byker; Dejian Zhou; Kumar Sinniah
Journal:  Chemistry       Date:  2009-08-17       Impact factor: 5.236

6.  Telomere shortening sensitizes cancer cells to selected cytotoxic agents: in vitro and in vivo studies and putative mechanisms.

Authors:  Orit Uziel; Einat Beery; Vladimir Dronichev; Katty Samocha; Sergei Gryaznov; Lola Weiss; Shimon Slavin; Michal Kushnir; Yardena Nordenberg; Claudette Rabinowitz; Baruch Rinkevich; Tania Zehavi; Meir Lahav
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-02-09       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  AZT as a telomerase inhibitor.

Authors:  Daniel E Gomez; Romina G Armando; Daniel F Alonso
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2012-09-06       Impact factor: 6.244

8.  Overexpression of Bcl-2 is associated with apoptotic resistance to the G-quadruplex ligand 12459 but is not sufficient to confer resistance to long-term senescence.

Authors:  Céline Douarre; Dennis Gomez; Hamid Morjani; Jean-Marie Zahm; Marie-Françoise O'donohue; Lahcen Eddabra; Patrick Mailliet; Jean-François Riou; Chantal Trentesaux
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2005-04-14       Impact factor: 16.971

9.  The G-quadruplex ligand telomestatin impairs binding of topoisomerase IIIalpha to G-quadruplex-forming oligonucleotides and uncaps telomeres in ALT cells.

Authors:  Nassima Temime-Smaali; Lionel Guittat; Assitan Sidibe; Kazuo Shin-ya; Chantal Trentesaux; Jean-François Riou
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-09-09       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  Trophoblast 'pseudo-tumorigenesis': significance and contributory factors.

Authors:  Rama Soundararajan; A Jagannadha Rao
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2004-03-25       Impact factor: 5.211

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.