Literature DB >> 10797294

Reactivity of natural and induced human antibodies to MUC1 mucin with MUC1 peptides and n-acetylgalactosamine (GalNAc) peptides.

S von Mensdorff-Pouilly1, E Petrakou, P Kenemans, K van Uffelen, A A Verstraeten, F G Snijdewint, G J van Kamp, D J Schol, C A Reis, M R Price, P O Livingston, J Hilgers.   

Abstract

Antibodies (Abs) to MUC1 occur naturally in both healthy subjects and cancer patients and can be induced by MUC1 peptide vaccination. We compared the specificity of natural and induced MUC1 Abs with the objective of defining an effective MUC1 vaccine for active immunotherapy of adenocarcinoma patients. Serum samples, selected out of a screened population of 492 subjects for their high levels of IgG and/or IgM MUC1 Abs, were obtained from 55 control subjects and from 26 breast cancer patients before primary treatment, as well as from 19 breast cancer patients immunized with MUC1 peptides coupled to keyhole limpet hemocyanin (KLH) and mixed with QS-21. The samples were tested with enzyme-linked immunoassays for reactivity with (1) overlapping hepta- and 20-mer peptides spanning the MUC1 tandem repeat sequence; (2) two modified 60-mer peptides with substitutions in the PDTR (PDTA) or in the STAPPA (STAAAA) sequence of each tandem repeat; and (3) four 60-mer glycopeptides with each 1, 2, 3 and 5 mol N-acetylgalactosamine (GalNAc) per repeat. More than one minimal epitopic sequence could be defined, indicating that Abs directed to more than one region of the MUC1 peptide core can coexist in one and the same subject. The most frequent minimal epitopic sequence of natural MUC1 IgG and IgM Abs was RPAPGS, followed by PPAHGVT and PDTRP. MUC1 peptide vaccination induced high titers of IgM and IgG Abs predominantly directed, respectively, to the PDTRPAP and the STAPPAHGV sequences of the tandem repeat. Natural MUC1 Abs from breast cancer patients reacted more strongly with the N-acetylgalactosamine (GalNAc) peptides than with the naked 60-mer peptide, while reactivity with the GalNAc-peptides was significantly reduced (2-tailed p < 0.0001) in the MUC1 IgG and IgM Abs induced by MUC1 peptide vaccination. Whereas in cancer patients glycans appear to participate in epitope conformation, the epitope(s) recognized by MUC1 Abs induced by peptide vaccination are already masked by minimal glycosylation. Therefore, our results indicate that a MUC1 glycopeptide would be a better vaccine than a naked peptide. Copyright 2000 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10797294     DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0215(20000601)86:5<702::aid-ijc16>3.0.co;2-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cancer        ISSN: 0020-7136            Impact factor:   7.396


  43 in total

1.  A high-throughput O-glycopeptide discovery platform for seromic profiling.

Authors:  Ola Blixt; Emiliano Cló; Aaron S Nudelman; Kasper Kildegaard Sørensen; Thomas Clausen; Hans H Wandall; Philip O Livingston; Henrik Clausen; Knud J Jensen
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2010-10-01       Impact factor: 4.466

2.  Autoantibody biomarkers identified by proteomics methods distinguish ovarian cancer from non-ovarian cancer with various CA-125 levels.

Authors:  Aykan A Karabudak; Julie Hafner; Vivekananda Shetty; Songming Chen; Angeles Alvarez Secord; Michael A Morse; Ramila Philip
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-09-03       Impact factor: 4.553

3.  Protective Epitope Discovery and Design of MUC1-based Vaccine for Effective Tumor Protections in Immunotolerant Mice.

Authors:  Xuanjun Wu; Zhaojun Yin; Craig McKay; Christian Pett; Jin Yu; Manuel Schorlemer; Trevor Gohl; Suttipun Sungsuwan; Sherif Ramadan; Claire Baniel; Anthony Allmon; Rupali Das; Ulrika Westerlind; M G Finn; Xuefei Huang
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2018-11-19       Impact factor: 15.419

Review 4.  Simple sugars to complex disease--mucin-type O-glycans in cancer.

Authors:  Matthew R Kudelka; Tongzhong Ju; Jamie Heimburg-Molinaro; Richard D Cummings
Journal:  Adv Cancer Res       Date:  2015-02-07       Impact factor: 6.242

5.  Aberrantly glycosylated MUC1 is expressed on the surface of breast cancer cells and a target for antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity.

Authors:  Kirstine Lavrsen; Caroline B Madsen; Morten G Rasch; Anders Woetmann; Niels Ødum; Ulla Mandel; Henrik Clausen; Anders E Pedersen; Hans H Wandall
Journal:  Glycoconj J       Date:  2012-08-10       Impact factor: 2.916

Review 6.  Genetically engineered mucin mouse models for inflammation and cancer.

Authors:  Suhasini Joshi; Sushil Kumar; Sangeeta Bafna; Satyanarayana Rachagani; Kay-Uwe Wagner; Maneesh Jain; Surinder K Batra
Journal:  Cancer Metastasis Rev       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 9.264

7.  Increasing the antigenicity of synthetic tumor-associated carbohydrate antigens by targeting Toll-like receptors.

Authors:  Sampat Ingale; Margreet A Wolfert; Therese Buskas; Geert-Jan Boons
Journal:  Chembiochem       Date:  2009-02-13       Impact factor: 3.164

Review 8.  Vaccines for cancer prevention: a practical and feasible approach to the cancer epidemic.

Authors:  Olivera J Finn
Journal:  Cancer Immunol Res       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 11.151

9.  Engineering of N. benthamiana L. plants for production of N-acetylgalactosamine-glycosylated proteins--towards development of a plant-based platform for production of protein therapeutics with mucin type O-glycosylation.

Authors:  Sasha M Daskalova; Josiah E Radder; Zbigniew A Cichacz; Sam H Olsen; George Tsaprailis; Hugh Mason; Linda C Lopez
Journal:  BMC Biotechnol       Date:  2010-08-24       Impact factor: 2.563

10.  Breast cancer humoral immune response: involvement of Lewis y through the detection of circulating immune complexes and association with Mucin 1 (MUC1).

Authors:  Marina Isla Larrain; Sandra Demichelis; Marina Crespo; Ezequiel Lacunza; Alberto Barbera; Aldo Cretón; Francisco Terrier; Amada Segal-Eiras; María Virginia Croce
Journal:  J Exp Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2009-08-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.