Literature DB >> 10796542

Educational outreach visits: effects on professional practice and health care outcomes.

M A Thomson O'Brien1, A D Oxman, D A Davis, R B Haynes, N Freemantle, E L Harvey.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Outreach visits have been identified as an intervention that may improve the practice of health care professionals, in particular prescribing. This type of 'face to face' visit has been referred to as university-based educational detailing, public interest detailing, and academic detailing.
OBJECTIVES: To assess the effects of outreach visits on improving health professional practice or patient outcomes. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched MEDLINE up to March 1997, the Research and Development Resource Base in Continuing Medical Education, and reference lists of related systematic reviews and articles. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised trials of outreach visits (defined as a personal visit by a trained person to a health care provider in his or her own setting). The participants were health care professionals. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two reviewers independently extracted data and assessed study quality. MAIN
RESULTS: Eighteen studies were included involving more than 1896 physicians. All of the outreach visit interventions consisted of several components, including written materials and conferences. Reminders or audit and feedback complemented some visits. In 13 studies, the targeted behaviours were prescribing practices. In three studies, the behaviours were preventive services, including counselling for smoking cessation. In two studies, the outreach visits were directed toward improving the general management of common problems encountered in general practice, including asthma, diabetes, otitis media, hypertension, anxiety, and acute bronchitis. All studies examined physician behaviour and in three studies other health professionals such as nurses, nursing home attendants or health care workers were targeted. Positive effects on practice were observed in all studies. Only one study measured a patient outcome. Few studies examined the cost effectiveness of outreach. REVIEWER'S
CONCLUSIONS: Educational outreach visits, particularly when combined with social marketing, appear to be a promising approach to modifying health professional behaviour, especially prescribing. Further research is needed to assess the effects of outreach visits for other aspects of practice and to identify key characteristics of outreach visits that are important to its success. The cost-effectiveness of outreach visits is not well evaluated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10796542     DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD000409

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev        ISSN: 1361-6137


  75 in total

1.  Prescribers prefer people: The sources of information used by doctors for prescribing suggest that the medium is more important than the message.

Authors:  P McGettigan; J Golden; J Fryer; R Chan; J Feely
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 4.335

2.  Does feedback improve the quality of computerized medical records in primary care?

Authors:  Simon De Lusignan; Peter N Stephens; Naeema Adal; Azeem Majeed
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2002 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.497

3.  Doctors perceptions of the influences on their prescribing: a comparison of general practitioners based in rural and urban Australia.

Authors:  Christopher Cutts; Susan E Tett
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2003-02-18       Impact factor: 2.953

4.  Postal survey of approaches to learning among Ontario physicians: implications for continuing medical education.

Authors:  M Dianne Delva; John R Kirby; Christopher K Knapper; R V Birtwhistle
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-11-23

5.  Cluster randomised controlled trial of an educational outreach visit to improve influenza and pneumococcal immunisation rates in primary care.

Authors:  A Niroshan Siriwardena; Aly Rashid; Mark R D Johnson; Michael E Dewey
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 5.386

6.  Workshop- and telephone-based interventions to improve adverse drug reaction reporting: a cluster-randomized trial in Portugal.

Authors:  Maria Teresa Herdeiro; Inês Ribeiro-Vaz; Mónica Ferreira; Jorge Polónia; Amílcar Falcão; Adolfo Figueiras
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2012-08-01       Impact factor: 5.606

7.  The break-even point: when medical advances are less important than improving the fidelity with which they are delivered.

Authors:  Steven H Woolf; Robert E Johnson
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2005 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.166

Review 8.  The judicious use of antibiotics--an investment towards optimized health care.

Authors:  Aditya H Gaur; B Keith English
Journal:  Indian J Pediatr       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 1.967

9.  Toward the implementation of mental health consumer provider services.

Authors:  Matthew Chinman; Alexander S Young; Joseph Hassell; Larry Davidson
Journal:  J Behav Health Serv Res       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 1.505

10.  A system-wide intervention to improve HIV testing in the Veterans Health Administration.

Authors:  Matthew Bidwell Goetz; Tuyen Hoang; Candice Bowman; Herschel Knapp; Barbara Rossman; Robert Smith; Henry Anaya; Teresa Osborn; Allen L Gifford; Steven M Asch
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2008-05-02       Impact factor: 5.128

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.