Literature DB >> 10796485

Interventions to promote collaboration between nurses and doctors.

M Zwarenstein1, W Bryant.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Lack of nurse-doctor collaboration contributes to problems in quality and efficiency of patient care.
OBJECTIVES: To assess the effects of interventions designed to improve nurse-doctor collaboration. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care Group specialised register and database of studies awaiting assessment, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register, the Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effectiveness, MEDLINE, and reference lists of articles up to the end of October 1999. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised trials, controlled before-and-after studies and interrupted time series of interventions to improve collaboration between nursing and medical professionals sharing patient care in primary or hospital care settings. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: One reviewer assessed the eligibility of potentially relevant studies, extracted data and assessed the quality of included studies; a second reviewer undertook duplicate assessments on the eligibility of some articles and data abstraction on all included studies. MAIN
RESULTS: Two trials involving 1945 people were included. One six month trial involving 1102 admissions evaluated daily, structured, team ward rounds, in which nurses, doctors and other professionals made care decisions jointly. There was shortened average length of hospital stay (LOS) from 6.06 to 5.46 days, and reduced hospital charges from US$ 8090 to 6681. There were no differences in mortality rates or the type of care to which patients were discharged. Another three month trial involving 843 admissions compared two female wards and evaluated a four times per week round. There were no significant differences between the intervention and control wards in total average length of stay for all patients (11.7 days in intervention ward versus 11.6 in the control ward). Excluding patients who died in hospital revealed shortened length of stay in the intervention ward (intervention ward 10.5 days, control ward 11.9). Mortality rates were not significantly different. REVIEWER'S
CONCLUSIONS: Increasing collaboration improved outcomes of importance to patients and to health care managers. These gains were moderate and affected health care processes rather than outcomes. Further research is needed to confirm these findings. The logistic challenge presented by the complexity of the interventions and the need for large sample sizes due to the likely modest impact and rarity of outcome events may best be met by multi-centre studies. Before launching such studies qualitative research is needed to identify barriers to collaboration. Interventions other than nurse-doctor ward rounds and team meetings should also be tested.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10796485     DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD000072

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev        ISSN: 1361-6137


  19 in total

1.  Transcending the silos: toward an interdisciplinary approach to end-of-life care in the ICU.

Authors:  J Randall Curtis; Sarah E Shannon
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2005-11-16       Impact factor: 17.440

2.  The impact of team science collaborations in health care: a synopsis and comment on "Interprofessional collaboration: effects of practice-based interventions on professional practice and healthcare outcomes".

Authors:  Joanna Buscemi; Jeremy Steglitz; Bonnie Spring
Journal:  Transl Behav Med       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 3.046

Review 3.  A systematic review of teamwork training interventions in medical student and resident education.

Authors:  Chayan Chakraborti; Romsai T Boonyasai; Scott M Wright; David E Kern
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2008-04-02       Impact factor: 5.128

4.  The Use of Research Evidence in Two International Organizations' Recommendations about Health Systems.

Authors:  Steven J Hoffman; John N Lavis; Sara Bennett
Journal:  Healthc Policy       Date:  2009-08

5.  Collaborative quality improvement to promote evidence based surfactant for preterm infants: a cluster randomised trial.

Authors:  Jeffrey D Horbar; Joseph H Carpenter; Jeffrey Buzas; Roger F Soll; Gautham Suresh; Michael B Bracken; Laura C Leviton; Paul E Plsek; John C Sinclair
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-10-30

6.  Relationships of the location and content of rounds to specialty, institution, patient-census, and team size.

Authors:  James R Priest; Sylvia Bereknyei; Kambria Hooper; Clarence H Braddock
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-06-21       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Evaluation of the impact of interdisciplinarity in cancer care.

Authors:  Dominique Tremblay; Danièle Roberge; Linda Cazale; Nassera Touati; Elizabeth Maunsell; Jean Latreille; Jacques Lemaire
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2011-06-03       Impact factor: 2.655

8.  Organizational interventions to implement improvements in patient care: a structured review of reviews.

Authors:  Michel Wensing; Hub Wollersheim; Richard Grol
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2006-02-22       Impact factor: 7.327

9.  Fever, hyperglycaemia and swallowing dysfunction management in acute stroke: a cluster randomised controlled trial of knowledge transfer.

Authors:  Sandy Middleton; Christopher Levi; Jeanette Ward; Jeremy Grimshaw; Rhonda Griffiths; Catherine D'Este; Simeon Dale; N Wah Cheung; Clare Quinn; Malcolm Evans; Dominique Cadilhac
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2009-03-16       Impact factor: 7.327

10.  Modelling innovative interventions for optimising healthy lifestyle promotion in primary health care: "prescribe Vida Saludable" phase I research protocol.

Authors:  Alvaro Sanchez; Gonzalo Grandes; Josep M Cortada; Haizea Pombo; Laura Balague; Carlos Calderon
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2009-06-18       Impact factor: 2.655

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.