BACKGROUND: Closure of asylums and institutions for the mentally ill, coupled with government policies focusing on reducing the number of hospital beds for people with severe mental illness in favour of providing care in a variety of non-hospital settings underpins the rationale behind care in the community. A major thrust towards community care has been the development of community mental health teams (CMHT). OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effects of community mental health team (CMHT) treatment for anyone with serious mental illness. SEARCH STRATEGY: Electronic searches of Biological Abstracts (1982-1997), the Cochrane Library (1998, Issue 2), EMBASE (1980-1997), MEDLINE (1966-1997), PsycLIT (1974-1997) and SCISEARCH (1997) were undertaken. The Journal of Personality Disorders was hand searched, and contact was made with colleagues at ENMESH, ISSPD and in forensic psychiatry. SELECTION CRITERIA: All randomised or quasi-randomised controlled trials of CMHT management versus non-team standard care. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: The selection of trials, assessment of quality and data extraction was undertaken independently and in parallel by two reviewers. Where possible the data were entered into RevMan and an intention-to-treat analysis undertaken. Tests of heterogeneity were undertaken. MAIN RESULTS: CMHT management may be associated with fewer deaths by suicide and in suspicious circumstances (OR 0.32 CI 0.09-1.12). It causes less people to be dissatisfied with their care (OR 0.34 CI 0.2-0.59) and to leave the studies early (OR 0.61 CI 0.45-0.83). No clear difference was found in admission rates, overall clinical outcomes and duration of in-patient hospital treatment, although this was partly a consequence of poorly presented data. REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: Community mental health team management is not inferior to non-team standard care in any important respects and is superior in promoting greater acceptance of treatment. It may also be superior in reducing hospital admission and avoiding death by suicide.
BACKGROUND: Closure of asylums and institutions for the mentally ill, coupled with government policies focusing on reducing the number of hospital beds for people with severe mental illness in favour of providing care in a variety of non-hospital settings underpins the rationale behind care in the community. A major thrust towards community care has been the development of community mental health teams (CMHT). OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effects of community mental health team (CMHT) treatment for anyone with serious mental illness. SEARCH STRATEGY: Electronic searches of Biological Abstracts (1982-1997), the Cochrane Library (1998, Issue 2), EMBASE (1980-1997), MEDLINE (1966-1997), PsycLIT (1974-1997) and SCISEARCH (1997) were undertaken. The Journal of Personality Disorders was hand searched, and contact was made with colleagues at ENMESH, ISSPD and in forensic psychiatry. SELECTION CRITERIA: All randomised or quasi-randomised controlled trials of CMHT management versus non-team standard care. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: The selection of trials, assessment of quality and data extraction was undertaken independently and in parallel by two reviewers. Where possible the data were entered into RevMan and an intention-to-treat analysis undertaken. Tests of heterogeneity were undertaken. MAIN RESULTS:CMHT management may be associated with fewer deaths by suicide and in suspicious circumstances (OR 0.32 CI 0.09-1.12). It causes less people to be dissatisfied with their care (OR 0.34 CI 0.2-0.59) and to leave the studies early (OR 0.61 CI 0.45-0.83). No clear difference was found in admission rates, overall clinical outcomes and duration of in-patient hospital treatment, although this was partly a consequence of poorly presented data. REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: Community mental health team management is not inferior to non-team standard care in any important respects and is superior in promoting greater acceptance of treatment. It may also be superior in reducing hospital admission and avoiding death by suicide.