Literature DB >> 10795986

Converting absorbed dose to medium to absorbed dose to water for Monte Carlo based photon beam dose calculations.

J V Siebers1, P J Keall, A E Nahum, R Mohan.   

Abstract

Current clinical experience in radiation therapy is based upon dose computations that report the absorbed dose to water, even though the patient is not made of water but of many different types of tissue. While Monte Carlo dose calculation algorithms have the potential for higher dose accuracy, they usually transport particles in and compute the absorbed dose to the patient media such as soft tissue, lung or bone. Therefore, for dose calculation algorithm comparisons, or to report dose to water or tissue contained within a bone matrix for example, a method to convert dose to the medium to dose to water is required. This conversion has been developed here by applying Bragg-Gray cavity theory. The dose ratio for 6 and 18 MV photon beams was determined by computing the average stopping power ratio for the primary electron spectrum in the transport media. For soft tissue, the difference between dose to medium and dose to water is approximately 1.0%, while for cortical bone the dose difference exceeds 10%. The variation in the dose ratio as a function of depth and position in the field indicates that for photon beams a single correction factor can be used for each particular material throughout the field for a given photon beam energy. The only exception to this would be for the clinically non-relevant dose to air. Pre-computed energy spectra for 60Co to 24 MV are used to compute the dose ratios for these photon beams and to determine an effective energy for evaluation of the dose ratio.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10795986     DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/45/4/313

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  38 in total

1.  Dosimetric verification of the anisotropic analytical algorithm in lung equivalent heterogeneities with and without bone equivalent heterogeneities.

Authors:  Kaoru Ono; Satoru Endo; Kenichi Tanaka; Masaharu Hoshi; Yutaka Hirokawa
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Dose specification for hippocampal sparing whole brain radiotherapy (HS WBRT): considerations from the UK HIPPO trial QA programme.

Authors:  Daniel Megias; Mark Phillips; Laura Clifton-Hadley; Elizabeth Harron; David J Eaton; Paul Sanghera; Gillian Whitfield
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2017-01-06       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  Iterative metal artifact reduction improves dose calculation accuracy : Phantom study with dental implants.

Authors:  Manuel Maerz; Pia Mittermair; Andreas Krauss; Oliver Koelbl; Barbara Dobler
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2016-03-11       Impact factor: 3.621

4.  Dose Specification for NRG Radiation Therapy Trials.

Authors:  David J Gladstone; Stephen F Kry; Ying Xiao; Indrin J Chetty
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2016-04-07       Impact factor: 7.038

5.  Cerenkov emission induced by external beam radiation stimulates molecular fluorescence.

Authors:  Johan Axelsson; Scott C Davis; David J Gladstone; Brian W Pogue
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  On the dosimetric impact of inhomogeneity management in the Acuros XB algorithm for breast treatment.

Authors:  Antonella Fogliata; Giorgia Nicolini; Alessandro Clivio; Eugenio Vanetti; Luca Cozzi
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2011-08-26       Impact factor: 3.481

7.  Experimental validation of deterministic Acuros XB algorithm for IMRT and VMAT dose calculations with the Radiological Physics Center's head and neck phantom.

Authors:  Tao Han; Firas Mourtada; Kelly Kisling; Justin Mikell; David Followill; Rebecca Howell
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 4.071

8.  Clinical relevance of different dose calculation strategies for mediastinal IMRT in Hodgkin's disease.

Authors:  J Koeck; Y Abo-Madyan; H T Eich; F Stieler; J Fleckenstein; J Kriz; R-P Mueller; F Wenz; F Lohr
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2012-06-29       Impact factor: 3.621

9.  Dosimetric impact of Acuros XB deterministic radiation transport algorithm for heterogeneous dose calculation in lung cancer.

Authors:  Tao Han; David Followill; Justin Mikell; Roman Repchak; Andrea Molineu; Rebecca Howell; Mohammad Salehpour; Firas Mourtada
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 4.071

10.  Monte Carlo dose verification of prostate patients treated with simultaneous integrated boost intensity modulated radiation therapy.

Authors:  Nesrin Dogan; Ivaylo Mihaylov; Yan Wu; Paul J Keall; Jeffrey V Siebers; Michael P Hagan
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2009-06-15       Impact factor: 3.481

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.