Literature DB >> 10795453

Analysis of stress distribution in a screw-retained implant prosthesis.

F Watanabe1, I Uno, Y Hata, G Neuendorff, A Kirsch.   

Abstract

Four types of implant superstructures were screwed onto implant bodies, and the strains created around the implant bodies were compared and analyzed within the IMZ Implant System. Three IMZ implants were embedded in the center of a polyurethane block (30 x 40 x 30 mm), and a total of 16 superstructures was fabricated by 4 methods: 1-piece cast, 1-piece cast/split soldering, soldering, and passive fit. Six strain gauges were placed on the surface of the block 1 mm apart. Three embedded implants were numbered, and a fixed partial denture was placed on these implants and screwed by a torque wrench using 14.5 Ncm torque. This procedure was repeated 7 times for each fixed partial denture, and each created strain was measured when the last screw was tightened. In all fixed partial dentures, strains were produced around the implant bodies when screws retaining the prosthesis were tightened, and the strain was relieved with unscrewing. The magnitude of strain was greater with the 1-piece cast method or the section/solder method than with the soldering and passive-fit methods. Of the 2 soldering methods, when the screw on the middle implant was tightened before those on the terminal 2 implants, the magnitude of strain was lower with the soldering method than with the 1-piece cast/split soldering method. When the order of screw tightening was changed, there were significant differences in the magnitude of strain at each gauge with the soldering method. With the passive-fit method, no differences in the magnitude of strain attributable to the order of screw tightening could be detected. The magnitude of strain produced around a screw-retained implant prosthesis was significantly lower with the passive-fit method when compared to the other 3 fabricating methods. Furthermore, the implants prepared by the passive-fit method were not affected by the order of screw tightening.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10795453

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants        ISSN: 0882-2786            Impact factor:   2.804


  7 in total

1.  Analysis of fit on implants of chrome cobalt versus titanium frameworks made by cad / cam milling.

Authors:  Begoña Oteiza-Galdón; Amparo Martínez-González; Ángel-Vicente Escuder
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2020-10-01

2.  Finite element modeling technique for predicting mechanical behaviors on mandible bone during mastication.

Authors:  Hee-Sun Kim; Jae-Yong Park; Na-Eun Kim; Yeong-Soo Shin; Ji-Man Park; Youn-Sic Chun
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2012-11-29       Impact factor: 1.904

3.  Comparative three-dimensional finite element analysis of implant-supported fixed complete arch mandibular prostheses in two materials.

Authors:  João Paulo Mendes Tribst; Dayana Campanelli de Morais; Alexandre Abhdala Alonso; Amanda Maria de Oliveira Dal Piva; Alexandre Luis Souto Borges
Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc       Date:  2017 Jul-Sep

4.  Comparative study on stress distribution around internal tapered connection implants according to fit of cement- and screw-retained prostheses.

Authors:  Mi-Young Lee; Seong-Joo Heo; Eun-Jin Park; Ji-Man Park
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2013-08-31       Impact factor: 1.904

5.  Split-Framework in Mandibular Implant-Supported Prosthesis.

Authors:  Danny Omar Mendoza Marin; Kássia de Carvalho Dias; André Gustavo Paleari; Ana Carolina Pero; João Neudenir Arioli Filho; Marco Antonio Compagnoni
Journal:  Case Rep Dent       Date:  2015-12-03

6.  A strain gauge analysis comparing 4-unit veneered zirconium dioxide implant-borne fixed dental prosthesis on engaging and non-engaging abutments before and after torque application.

Authors:  Alyssa Epprecht; Marco Zeltner; Goran Benic; Mutlu Özcan
Journal:  Clin Exp Dent Res       Date:  2018-02-15

7.  Effect of joining the sectioned implant-supported prosthesis on the peri-implant strain generated in simulated mandibular model.

Authors:  Ipsha Singh; K Chandrasekharan Nair; Jayakar Shetty
Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc       Date:  2017 Oct-Dec
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.