BACKGROUND: Small for gestational age (SGA) extremely low birthweight (ELBW < 1000 g) survivors often remain small and/or have subnormal school performance. Some are twins/triplets with larger appropriate size for gestational age (AGA) co-twins/triplets. OBJECTIVE: To assess whether SGA ELBW twins/triplets remain different from their AGA co-twins/triplets. DESIGN, SETTING: During 1981-1999, 353 SGA ELBW neonates were admitted to our neonatal intensive care unit: 267 survived, 54/267 were twins/triplets, and 36/54 had AGA surviving co-twins/triplets. This longitudinal study describes the growth, neurodevelopmental outcome, and school performance of these 36 sets (3-17 years). The children were classified as normal, or having minor, moderate, or severe deficiencies. RESULTS: Values for birth weight (mean intrapair z score difference 2.26), length (2.74), and head circumference (2.62) were lower in SGA neonates than in AGA co-twins/triplets. SGA survivors remained smaller at 3-6 years of age: mean intrapair z score difference in weight, 1.37, height, 1.54, head circumference, 1.21. From 6 to 17 years, smaller differences persisted. Former SGA children had a tendency to have motor deficiencies (nine SGA v three AGA) and mental retardation (seven v four), same hearing loss (two v two), but significantly more visual abnormalities (15 v 11), behavioural disturbances (14 v five), and speech problems (14 v eight). Twenty four sets were in the same normal level class, often supported by familial/professional help. CONCLUSIONS: Although raised in the same environment, SGA ELBW survivors remained smaller and had more visual/behavioural/speech problems, but most maintained grade level parity with their AGA siblings, with appropriate help.
BACKGROUND: Small for gestational age (SGA) extremely low birthweight (ELBW < 1000 g) survivors often remain small and/or have subnormal school performance. Some are twins/triplets with larger appropriate size for gestational age (AGA) co-twins/triplets. OBJECTIVE: To assess whether SGA ELBW twins/triplets remain different from their AGA co-twins/triplets. DESIGN, SETTING: During 1981-1999, 353 SGA ELBW neonates were admitted to our neonatal intensive care unit: 267 survived, 54/267 were twins/triplets, and 36/54 had AGA surviving co-twins/triplets. This longitudinal study describes the growth, neurodevelopmental outcome, and school performance of these 36 sets (3-17 years). The children were classified as normal, or having minor, moderate, or severe deficiencies. RESULTS: Values for birth weight (mean intrapair z score difference 2.26), length (2.74), and head circumference (2.62) were lower in SGA neonates than in AGA co-twins/triplets. SGA survivors remained smaller at 3-6 years of age: mean intrapair z score difference in weight, 1.37, height, 1.54, head circumference, 1.21. From 6 to 17 years, smaller differences persisted. Former SGA children had a tendency to have motor deficiencies (nine SGA v three AGA) and mental retardation (seven v four), same hearing loss (two v two), but significantly more visual abnormalities (15 v 11), behavioural disturbances (14 v five), and speech problems (14 v eight). Twenty four sets were in the same normal level class, often supported by familial/professional help. CONCLUSIONS: Although raised in the same environment, SGA ELBW survivors remained smaller and had more visual/behavioural/speech problems, but most maintained grade level parity with their AGA siblings, with appropriate help.
Authors: S Zucchini; E Cacciari; A Balsamo; A Cicognani; D Tassinari; E Barbieri; S Gualandi Journal: Arch Dis Child Date: 2001-04 Impact factor: 3.791
Authors: K Sommerfelt; H W Andersson; K Sonnander; G Ahlsten; B Ellertsen; T Markestad; G Jacobsen; H J Hoffman; L Bakketeig Journal: Arch Dis Child Date: 2000-07 Impact factor: 3.791
Authors: Cecilie Halling; Fergal D Malone; Fionnuala M Breathnach; Moira C Stewart; Fionnuala M McAuliffe; John J Morrison; Patrick Dicker; Fiona Manning; John David Corcoran Journal: Eur J Pediatr Date: 2015-10-21 Impact factor: 3.183
Authors: Lilia C De Jesus; Athina Pappas; Seetha Shankaran; Lei Li; Abhik Das; Edward F Bell; Barbara J Stoll; Abbot R Laptook; Michele C Walsh; Ellen C Hale; Nancy S Newman; Rebecca Bara; Rosemary D Higgins Journal: J Pediatr Date: 2013-02-14 Impact factor: 4.406
Authors: Jung Ho Han; So Jin Yoon; Hye Sun Lee; Goeun Park; Joohee Lim; Jeong Eun Shin; Ho Seon Eun; Min Soo Park; Soon Min Lee Journal: Yonsei Med J Date: 2022-07 Impact factor: 3.052
Authors: Karien E A Hack; Corine Koopman-Esseboom; Jan B Derks; Sjoerd G Elias; Martin J K de Kleine; Wim Baerts; Attie T J I Go; Arty H P Schaap; Mark A H B M van der Hoeven; Alex J Eggink; Krystyna M Sollie; Nynke Weisglas-Kuperus; Gerard H A Visser Journal: PLoS One Date: 2009-08-28 Impact factor: 3.240