Literature DB >> 10794360

The predictive value of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation testing.

A Bansal1, G C Critchfield, T S Frank, J E Reid, A Thomas, A M Deffenbaugh, S L Neuhausen.   

Abstract

Genetic testing for mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2, two genes predisposing to breast and ovarian cancers, is available to women with a relevant family history. The aim of this study was to estimate the positive and negative predictive value of clinical sequence analysis of these genes. A reference graph showing positive and negative predictive values over a range of pre-test risk was derived, taking into account the sensitivity and specificity of a full-sequence analysis test. High positive and negative predictive values were found for women with pre-test risk between 4% and 40%, a range of risk commonly seen in clinical testing. The predictive value of full sequence and single-site analysis of BRCA1 and BRCA2, therefore, compares favorably with other diagnostic medical tests. Our results provide a numerical estimate of the predictive value of BRCA testing, and as such, provide a valuable tool to healthcare providers and families as they interpret BRCA1 and BRCA2 test results.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10794360     DOI: 10.1089/109065700316462

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genet Test        ISSN: 1090-6576


  5 in total

Review 1.  Risk and protection in prodromal schizophrenia: ethical implications for clinical practice and future research.

Authors:  Nasra Haroun; Laura Dunn; Ansar Haroun; Kristin S Cadenhead
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2005-10-05       Impact factor: 9.306

2.  Prevalence of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations in women with breast carcinoma In Situ and referred for genetic testing.

Authors:  Michael J Hall; Julia E Reid; Richard J Wenstrup
Journal:  Cancer Prev Res (Phila)       Date:  2010-12

3.  Validation of the BRCA1 antibody MS110 and the utility of BRCA1 as a patient selection biomarker in immunohistochemical analysis of breast and ovarian tumours.

Authors:  Roy Milner; Helen Wombwell; Sonia Eckersley; Donna Barnes; Juli Warwicker; Erica Van Dorp; Rachel Rowlinson; Simon Dearden; Glen Hughes; Chris Harbron; Bob Wellings; Darren Hodgson; Chris Womack; Neil Gray; Alan Lau; Mark J O'Connor; Catherine Marsden; Alexander J Kvist
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2013-01-25       Impact factor: 4.064

Review 4.  Closing the gap between knowledge and clinical application: challenges for genomic translation.

Authors:  Wylie Burke; Diane M Korngiebel
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2015-02-26       Impact factor: 5.917

Review 5.  Simulation modeling for stratified breast cancer screening - a systematic review of cost and quality of life assumptions.

Authors:  Matthias Arnold
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2017-12-02       Impact factor: 2.655

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.