Literature DB >> 10791376

Consequences of discharges from intensive care at night.

C Goldfrad1, K Rowan.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: It is generally believed that pressure for beds on intensive-care units (ICUs) has increased in the UK. This study used discharge at night as a proxy measure to investigate pressure.
METHODS: Night was defined in two ways: "out of office hours' from 2200 to 0659 h and "the early hours of the morning" from 0000 to 0459 h. The rate of discharge at night was compared for 21 295 adult admissions to 62 ICUs covering the period 1995-98 with 10806 admissions to 26 ICUs covering the period 1988-90. With data solely from 1995-98, the consequences of discharge at night and premature discharge were investigated.
FINDINGS: Overall, 2269 (21.0%) admissions did not survive the ICU in 1988-90 compared with 4487 (21.1%) in 1995-98. Of ICU survivors, 2.7% were discharged at night (2200-0659 h) in 1988-90 compared with 6.0% in 1995-98. In 1995-98, night discharges (2200-0659 h) had a higher crude (odds ratio 1.46, 95% CI 1.18-1.80) and case-mix adjusted (1.33, 1.06-1.65) ultimate hospital mortality. Higher odds ratios were observed when the definition of night was 0000-0459 h. Premature discharge was commoner at night, 42.6% vs 5.0% and its importance was apparent when incorporated into the logistic-regression model (premature discharge 1.35, 1.10-1.65; night discharge 1.17, 0.92-1.49).
INTERPRETATION: Night discharges from ICU are increasing in the UK. This practice is of concern because patients discharged at night fare significantly worse than those discharged during the day. Night discharges are more likely to be "premature" in the view of the clinicians involved. The implication of these results is that many hospitals have insufficient intensive-care beds. In deciding whether or not to invest more resources in intensive care we must, however, consider the cost-utility of this particular service compared with other ways that additional resources could be used.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10791376     DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)02062-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet        ISSN: 0140-6736            Impact factor:   79.321


  82 in total

Review 1.  The pulmonary physician in critical care: towards comprehensive critical care?

Authors:  M J D Griffiths; T W Evans
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 9.139

2.  Using high quality clinical databases to complement the results of randomised controlled trials: the case of recombinant human activated protein C.

Authors:  A Padkin; K Rowan; N Black
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-10-20

Review 3.  [Scoring systems in the intensive care unit].

Authors:  K Lewandowski; M Lewandowski
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 1.041

4.  Risk of death or readmission among people discharged from hospital on Fridays.

Authors:  Carl van Walraven; Chaim M Bell
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2002-06-25       Impact factor: 8.262

5.  Directory of clinical databases: improving and promoting their use.

Authors:  N Black; M Payne
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2003-10

Review 6.  Variation in intensive care unit outcomes by day of week: no weak-end.

Authors:  Chaim M Bell; Damon C Scales
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2004-03-18       Impact factor: 17.440

7.  Epidemiology of admissions to 11 stand-alone high-dependency care units in the UK.

Authors:  Meghan Prin; David Harrison; Kathryn Rowan; Hannah Wunsch
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2015-09-10       Impact factor: 17.440

8.  Volume of activity and occupancy rate in intensive care units. Association with mortality.

Authors:  Gaetano Lapichino; Luciano Gattinoni; Danilo Radrizzani; Bruno Simini; Guido Bertolini; Luca Ferla; Giovanni Mistraletti; Francesca Porta; Dinis R Miranda
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2003-12-19       Impact factor: 17.440

9.  The impact of the organization of high-dependency care on acute hospital mortality and patient flow for critically ill patients.

Authors:  Hannah Wunsch; David A Harrison; Andrew Jones; Kathryn Rowan
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2015-01-15       Impact factor: 21.405

10.  External validation of the SAPS II, APACHE II and APACHE III prognostic models in South England: a multicentre study.

Authors:  Dieter H Beck; Gary B Smith; John V Pappachan; Brian Millar
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2003-01-18       Impact factor: 17.440

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.