Literature DB >> 10790684

Strategies for comparing treatments on a binary response with multi-centre data.

A Agresti1, J Hartzel.   

Abstract

This paper surveys methods for comparing treatments on a binary response when observations occur for several strata. A common application is multi-centre clinical trials, in which the strata refer to a sample of centres or sites of some type. Questions of interest include how one should summarize the difference between the treatments, how one should make inferential comparisons, how one should investigate whether treatment-by-centre interaction exists, how one should describe effects when interaction exists, whether one should treat centres and centre-specific treatment effects as fixed or random, and whether centres that have either 0 successes or 0 failures should contribute to the analysis. This article discusses these matters in the context of various strategies for analysing such data, in particular focusing on special problems presented by sparse data. Copyright 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10790684     DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0258(20000430)19:8<1115::aid-sim408>3.0.co;2-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  27 in total

1.  Design and analysis of controlled trials in naturally clustered environments: implications for medical informatics.

Authors:  Jen-Hsiang Chuang; George Hripcsak; Daniel F Heitjan
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2002 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.497

2.  Association of Do-Not-Resuscitate Orders and Hospital Mortality Rate Among Patients With Pneumonia.

Authors:  Allan J Walkey; Janice Weinberg; Renda Soylemez Wiener; Colin R Cooke; Peter K Lindenauer
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 21.873

3.  Psychiatric adverse events in randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trials of varenicline: a pooled analysis.

Authors:  Serena Tonstad; Simon Davies; Martina Flammer; Cristina Russ; John Hughes
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2010-04-01       Impact factor: 5.606

4.  Hospital Variation in Utilization of Life-Sustaining Treatments among Patients with Do Not Resuscitate Orders.

Authors:  Allan J Walkey; Janice Weinberg; Renda Soylemez Wiener; Colin R Cooke; Peter K Lindenauer
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2017-01-18       Impact factor: 3.402

5.  Meta-analysis of safety for low event-rate binomial trials.

Authors:  Jonathan J Shuster; Jennifer D Guo; Jay S Skyler
Journal:  Res Synth Methods       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 5.273

Review 6.  Many multicenter trials had few events per center, requiring analysis via random-effects models or GEEs.

Authors:  Brennan C Kahan; Michael O Harhay
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2015-04-02       Impact factor: 6.437

7.  Temporal sequencing of nicotine dependence and bipolar disorder in the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions (NESARC).

Authors:  José M Martínez-Ortega; Benjamin I Goldstein; Luis Gutiérrez-Rojas; Regina Sala; Shuai Wang; Carlos Blanco
Journal:  J Psychiatr Res       Date:  2013-04-11       Impact factor: 4.791

Review 8.  Hypothermia in the management of traumatic brain injury. A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  William R Henderson; Vinay K Dhingra; Dean R Chittock; John C Fenwick; Juan J Ronco
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2003-08-12       Impact factor: 17.440

9.  Methods for Estimating Center Effects on Recurrent Events.

Authors:  Dandan Liu; John D Kalbfleisch; Douglas E Schaubel
Journal:  Stat Biosci       Date:  2014-05-01

10.  Covariate imbalance and adjustment for logistic regression analysis of clinical trial data.

Authors:  Jody D Ciolino; Renée H Martin; Wenle Zhao; Edward C Jauch; Michael D Hill; Yuko Y Palesch
Journal:  J Biopharm Stat       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 1.051

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.