Literature DB >> 10788856

The factors associated with neck pain and its related disability in the Saskatchewan population.

P Côté1, J D Cassidy, L Carroll.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Population-based, cross-sectional mailed survey.
OBJECTIVE: To identify factors associated with neck pain and its related disability in Saskatchewan adults. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND INFORMATION: Little is known about the etiology of neck pain and its related disability. Previous cross-sectional population-based studies have suggested that neck pain may be associated with age, female gender, lower socioeconomic status, physically demanding work, and other comorbidities.
METHODS: The Saskatchewan Health and Back Pain Survey was mailed to 2184 randomly selected Saskatchewan adults 20 to 69 years of age. Fifty-five percent of the study population participated. The survey collected demographic, socioeconomic, and health-related information. Neck pain and its related disability was classified into four categories using the Chronic Pain Questionnaire: no neck pain (Grade 0), low intensity/low disability neck pain (Grade I), high intensity/low disability neck pain (Grade II), and high disability neck pain (Grades III-IV). Polytomous logistic regression was used to identify associations between demographic, socioeconomic, and health-related variables and various grades of neck pain severity.
RESULTS: Of the 1131 respondents, 54% had experienced neck pain at some point in the 6 months before the survey, and almost 5% were highly disabled by neck pain. The prevalence of Grade I neck pain was lower in individuals with low education attainment, but higher for those reporting headaches, low back pain, better general health, and a history of neck injury resulting from a motor vehicle collision, some of whom may have received compensation for their injury. Grade II neck pain was strongly associated with headache, low back pain, and a history of neck injury during a motor vehicle collision and weakly associated with digestive disorders and current cigarette smoking. Grades III-IV neck pain was strongly associated with low back pain, headaches, cardiovascular disorders, digestive disorders, and a history of neck injury during a motor vehicle collision.
CONCLUSION: This study suggests that important associations exist between comorbidities, a past history of neck injury resulting from a motor vehicle collision, and graded neck pain. Importantly, individuals who are significantly disabled by neck pain also have comorbidities that have a moderate or severe impact on their health, suggesting that chronic disorders tend to cluster in some individuals.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10788856     DOI: 10.1097/00007632-200005010-00012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  55 in total

1.  Impact of musculoskeletal co-morbidity of neck and upper extremities on healthcare utilisation and sickness absence for low back pain.

Authors:  W IJzelenberg; A Burdorf
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 4.402

2.  Cervical spine: degenerative conditions.

Authors:  Andrew G Todd
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2011-12

3.  Neck pain patients' preference scores for their current health.

Authors:  Gabrielle van der Velde; Sheilah Hogg-Johnson; Ahmed M Bayoumi; Pierre Côté; Hilary Llewellyn-Thomas; Eric L Hurwitz; Murray Krahn
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2010-03-27       Impact factor: 4.147

4.  Cervical range of movement in relation to neck dimension.

Authors:  Jeremy Reynolds; D Marsh; Heiko Koller; Juliane Zenenr; G Bannister
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-04-08       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  A literature review of neck pain associated with computer use: public health implications.

Authors:  Bart N Green
Journal:  J Can Chiropr Assoc       Date:  2008-08

6.  Impact of motor vehicle accidents on neck pain and disability in general practice.

Authors:  Cees J Vos; Arianne P Verhagen; Jan Passchier; Bart W Koes
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 5.386

7.  Development of a clinical prediction rule to identify patients with neck pain likely to benefit from cervical traction and exercise.

Authors:  Nicole H Raney; Evan J Petersen; Tracy A Smith; James E Cowan; Daniel G Rendeiro; Gail D Deyle; John D Childs
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-01-14       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 8.  Cervical spine manifestations in patients with inflammatory arthritides.

Authors:  Thomas D Cha; Howard S An
Journal:  Nat Rev Rheumatol       Date:  2013-03-26       Impact factor: 20.543

9.  Neck pain and disability due to neck pain: what is the relation?

Authors:  René Fejer; Jan Hartvigsen
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-10-23       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  Rehabilitation program for traumatic chronic cervical pain associated with unsteadiness: a single case study.

Authors:  Danik Lafond; Annick Champagne; Rosalie Cadieux; Martin Descarreaux
Journal:  Chiropr Osteopat       Date:  2008-11-17
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.