PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to assess the prognostic significance of pretreatment quality of life (QoL) scores and symptom scores in a group of patients treated with high dose radiotherapy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 198 patients treated with external irradiation (>/=60 Gy) were included. In all these patients, baseline QoL was assessed using the EORTC QLQ-C30. The prognostic significance of a number of non-QoL and QoL parameters with regard to survival was estimated in both univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS: In a multivariate model including the non-QoL parameters, performance status, weight loss and N-classification were independent prognostic factors for survival. After entering the QoL parameters in the model, global QoL was the strongest prognostic factor, while performance status lost its significance. Subsequently, a significant interaction term was found between N-classification and global QoL, indicating that global QoL was an independent prognostic factor but that the effect varied as a function of N-status. In N+ patients, the median survival in the group with low scores for global QoL was 4.5 months, which was significantly worse (P<0.0001) compared with the high score group in which the median survival was 12.9 months. CONCLUSION: Global QoL is a strong prognostic factor for survival in patients with NSCLC who have pathological lymph nodes at presentation and who are treated with radical or curative radiotherapy.
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to assess the prognostic significance of pretreatment quality of life (QoL) scores and symptom scores in a group of patients treated with high dose radiotherapy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 198 patients treated with external irradiation (>/=60 Gy) were included. In all these patients, baseline QoL was assessed using the EORTC QLQ-C30. The prognostic significance of a number of non-QoL and QoL parameters with regard to survival was estimated in both univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS: In a multivariate model including the non-QoL parameters, performance status, weight loss and N-classification were independent prognostic factors for survival. After entering the QoL parameters in the model, global QoL was the strongest prognostic factor, while performance status lost its significance. Subsequently, a significant interaction term was found between N-classification and global QoL, indicating that global QoL was an independent prognostic factor but that the effect varied as a function of N-status. In N+ patients, the median survival in the group with low scores for global QoL was 4.5 months, which was significantly worse (P<0.0001) compared with the high score group in which the median survival was 12.9 months. CONCLUSION: Global QoL is a strong prognostic factor for survival in patients with NSCLC who have pathological lymph nodes at presentation and who are treated with radical or curative radiotherapy.
Authors: Angeles A Secord; Robert L Coleman; Laura J Havrilesky; Amy P Abernethy; Gregory P Samsa; David Cella Journal: Nat Rev Clin Oncol Date: 2015-03-10 Impact factor: 66.675
Authors: Deborah Watkins Bruner; Charlene J Bryan; Neil Aaronson; C Craig Blackmore; Michael Brundage; David Cella; Patricia A Ganz; Carolyn Gotay; Pamela S Hinds; Alice B Kornblith; Benjamin Movsas; Jeff Sloan; Lari Wenzel; Giles Whalen Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2007-11-10 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Libertad T Flores; Antonia V Bennett; Ethel B Law; Carla Hajj; Mindy P Griffith; Karyn A Goodman Journal: Gastrointest Cancer Res Date: 2012-07
Authors: Ethan Basch; Xiaoyu Jia; Glenn Heller; Allison Barz; Laura Sit; Michael Fruscione; Mark Appawu; Alexia Iasonos; Thomas Atkinson; Shari Goldfarb; Ann Culkin; Mark G Kris; Deborah Schrag Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2009-11-17 Impact factor: 13.506