Literature DB >> 10788197

Promising community-level indicators for evaluating cardiovascular health-promotion programs.

A Cheadle1, T D Sterling, T L Schmid, S B Fawcett.   

Abstract

Rigorous evaluation of community-based programs can be costly, particularly when a representative sample of all members of the community are surveyed in order to assess the impact of a program on individual health behavior. Community-level indicators (CLIs), which are based on observations of aspects of the community other than those associated with individuals, may serve to supplement individual-level measures in the evaluation of community-based programs or in some cases provide a lower-cost alternative to individual-level measures. Because they are often based on observations of the community environment, CLIs also provide a way of measuring environmental changes--often an intermediate goal of community-based programs. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention convened a panel of experts knowledgeable about community-based program evaluation and cardiovascular disease (CVD) prevention to develop a list of CLIs, and rate their feasibility, reliability and validity. The indicators developed by the panel covered tobacco use, physical activity, diet and a fourth group that were considered 'cross-cutting' because they related to all three behaviors. The indicators were subdivided into policy and regulation, information, environmental change, and behavioral outcome. For example, policy and regulation indicators included laws and ordinances on tobacco use, policies on physical education, and guidelines for menu and food preparation. These indicators provide a good starting point for communities interested in tracking CVD-related outcomes at the community level.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10788197     DOI: 10.1093/her/15.1.109

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Educ Res        ISSN: 0268-1153


  7 in total

Review 1.  Health promotion research: dilemmas and challenges.

Authors:  M A Koelen; L Vaandrager; C Colomér
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 3.710

2.  Measuring the environment for friendliness toward physical activity: a comparison of the reliability of 3 questionnaires.

Authors:  Ross C Brownson; Jen Jen Chang; Amy A Eyler; Barbara E Ainsworth; Karen A Kirtland; Brian E Saelens; James F Sallis
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  Local ordinances that promote physical activity: a survey of municipal policies.

Authors:  John J Librett; Michelle M Yore; Thomas L Schmid
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  Measuring the impact of public health policy.

Authors:  Ross C Brownson; Rachel Seiler; Amy A Eyler
Journal:  Prev Chronic Dis       Date:  2010-06-15       Impact factor: 2.830

5.  Quantifying the effect of a community-based injury prevention program in Queensland using a generalized estimating equation approach.

Authors:  Emily Yorkston; Catherine Turner; Philip J Schluter; Rod McClure
Journal:  Inj Prev       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 2.399

Review 6.  Community wide interventions for increasing physical activity.

Authors:  Philip R A Baker; Daniel P Francis; Jesus Soares; Alison L Weightman; Charles Foster
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-01-05

7.  Policy and environmental indicators for heart disease and stroke prevention: data sources in two states.

Authors:  Delores M Pluto; Martha M Phillips; Dyann Matson-Koffman; Dennis M Shepard; James M Raczynski; J Nell Brownstein
Journal:  Prev Chronic Dis       Date:  2004-03-15       Impact factor: 2.830

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.