Literature DB >> 10786325

Talking about cases in bioethics: the effect of an intensive course on health care professionals.

J I Malek1, G Geller, J Sugarman.   

Abstract

Educational efforts in bioethics are prevalent, but little is known about their efficacy. Although previous work indicates that courses in bioethics have a demonstrable effect on medical students, it has not examined their effect on health care professionals. In this report, we describe a study designed to investigate the effect of bioethics education on health care professionals. At the Intensive Bioethics Course, a six-day course held annually at Georgetown University, we administered a questionnaire requiring open-ended responses to vignettes both before and after the course. Following the course, respondents defended their responses more carefully and articulated their thoughts more clearly. In addition, after the course respondents seemed to have a more subtle understanding of the relevant issues in the cases and applied theory to these cases more frequently. These findings help to formulate an understanding of the effect of bioethics education on health care professionals.

Keywords:  Bioethics and Professional Ethics; Empirical Approach; Georgetown University; Kennedy Institute of Ethics

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10786325      PMCID: PMC1733181          DOI: 10.1136/jme.26.2.131

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Ethics        ISSN: 0306-6800            Impact factor:   2.903


  16 in total

1.  Measuring the ethical sensitivity of medical students: a study at the University of Toronto.

Authors:  P C Hébert; E M Meslin; E V Dunn
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 2.903

2.  Evaluating ethical sensitivity in medical students: using vignettes as an instrument.

Authors:  P Hébert; E M Meslin; E V Dunn; N Byrne; S R Reid
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 2.903

3.  Evaluation of teaching medical ethics by an assessment of moral reasoning.

Authors:  D J Self; D C Baldwin; F D Wolinsky
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 6.251

Review 4.  Measurement of moral development in medicine.

Authors:  D J Self; E Davenport
Journal:  Camb Q Healthc Ethics       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 1.284

5.  The effect of teaching medical ethics on medical students' moral reasoning.

Authors:  D J Self; F D Wolinsky; D C Baldwin
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  1989-12       Impact factor: 6.893

6.  Ethical reasoning and decision-making in the clinical setting: assessing the process.

Authors:  C Myser; I H Kerridge; K R Mitchell
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 6.251

7.  Teaching ethics in psychiatry: a one-day workshop for clinical students.

Authors:  B Green; P D Miller; C P Routh
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 2.903

8.  Techniques for evaluating student performance in a preclinical medical ethics course.

Authors:  K R Howe; M S Jones
Journal:  J Med Educ       Date:  1984-04

9.  Using simulated case studies to evaluate a clinical ethics course for junior students.

Authors:  M Siegler; A G Rezler; K J Connell
Journal:  J Med Educ       Date:  1982-05

10.  The quality of mercy. Caring for patients with 'do not resuscitate' orders.

Authors:  D P Sulmasy; G Geller; R Faden; D M Levine
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1992-02-05       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  15 in total

1.  Learning outcomes in health care ethics; a case study concerning one course.

Authors:  Katia Käyhkö
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  2002

Review 2.  Critique of the "tragic case" method in ethics education.

Authors:  J Liaschenko; N Y Oguz; D Brunnquell
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 2.903

Review 3.  A qualitative approach to Responsible Conduct of Research (RCR) training development: identification of metacognitive strategies.

Authors:  Vykinta Kligyte; Richard T Marcy; Sydney T Sevier; Elaine S Godfrey; Michael D Mumford
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2007-09-26       Impact factor: 3.525

4.  A dynamic model of ethical reasoning in speech pathology.

Authors:  Belinda Kenny; Michelle Lincoln; Susan Balandin
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 2.903

5.  Application of a sensemaking approach to ethics training in the physical sciences and engineering.

Authors:  Vykinta Kligyte; Richard T Marcy; Ethan P Waples; Sydney T Sevier; Elaine S Godfrey; Michael D Mumford; Dean F Hougen
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2007-12-12       Impact factor: 3.525

Review 6.  Review of Instructional Approaches in Ethics Education.

Authors:  Tyler J Mulhearn; Logan M Steele; Logan L Watts; Kelsey E Medeiros; Michael D Mumford; Shane Connelly
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2016-07-07       Impact factor: 3.525

7.  A Meta-analytic Comparison of Face-to-Face and Online Delivery in Ethics Instruction: The Case for a Hybrid Approach.

Authors:  E Michelle Todd; Logan L Watts; Tyler J Mulhearn; Brett S Torrence; Megan R Turner; Shane Connelly; Michael D Mumford
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2017-02-01       Impact factor: 3.525

8.  Barriers to translating emerging genetic research on smoking into clinical practice. Perspectives of primary care physicians.

Authors:  Alexandra E Shields; David Blumenthal; Kevin B Weiss; Catherine B Comstock; Douglas Currivan; Caryn Lerman
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 5.128

9.  Research ethics capacity development in Africa: exploring a model for individual success.

Authors:  Joseph Ali; Adnan A Hyder; Nancy E Kass
Journal:  Dev World Bioeth       Date:  2012-06-18       Impact factor: 2.294

10.  Exploring Institutional Research Ethics Systems: A Case Study From Uganda.

Authors:  Adnan A Hyder; Joseph Ali; Kristina Hallez; Tara White; Nelson K Sewankambo; Nancy E Kass
Journal:  AJOB Empir Bioeth       Date:  2015-01-22
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.