Literature DB >> 10785217

Safety and effectiveness of vasectomy.

P J Schwingl1, H A Guess.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To recommend further research on vasectomy based on a systematic review of the effectiveness and safety of vasectomy.
DESIGN: A systematic MEDLINE review of the literature on the safety and effectiveness of vasectomy between 1964 and 1998. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Early failure rates are <1%; however, effectiveness and complications vary with experience of surgeons and surgical technique. Early complications, including hematoma, infection, sperm granulomas, epididymitis-orchitis, and congestive epididymitis, occur in 1%-6% of men undergoing vasectomy. Incidence of epididymal pain is poorly documented. Animal and human data indicate that vasectomy does not increase atherosclerosis and that increases in circulating immune complexes after vasectomy are transient in men with vasectomies. The weight of the evidence regarding prostate and testicular cancer suggests that men with vasectomy are not at increased risk of these cancers. CONCLUSION(S): Publications to date continue to support the conclusion that vasectomy is a highly effective form of contraception. Future studies should include evaluations of the long-term effectiveness of vasectomy, evaluating criteria for postvasectomy discontinuation of alternative contraception for use in settings where semen analysis is not practical, and characterizing complications including chronic epididymal pain syndrome.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biology; Cardiovascular Effects; Contraception; Contraceptive Effectiveness; Family Planning; Health; Literature Review; Male Sterilization; Physiology; Public Health; Safety; Sterilization, Sexual; Vasectomy

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10785217     DOI: 10.1016/s0015-0282(00)00482-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  43 in total

Review 1.  Requests for vasectomy: counselling and consent.

Authors:  N M Harris; S A Holmes
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 5.344

2.  British Andrology Society guidelines for the assessment of post vasectomy semen samples (2002).

Authors:  P Hancock; E McLaughlin
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 3.  Scalpel versus no-scalpel incision for vasectomy.

Authors:  Lynley A Cook; Asha Pun; Maria F Gallo; Laureen M Lopez; Huib A A M Van Vliet
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2014-03-30

4.  CUA guideline: Vasectomy.

Authors:  Armand Zini; John Grantmyre; Peter Chan
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2016-08-16       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 5.  Robotic assisted andrological surgery.

Authors:  Sijo J Parekattil; Ahmet Gudeloglu
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2012-12-17       Impact factor: 3.285

6.  Update on vasectomy protocol.

Authors:  Doron S Stember; Harris M Nagler
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 7.  Vasectomy occlusion techniques for male sterilization.

Authors:  Lynley A Cook; Huib A A M Van Vliet; Laureen M Lopez; Asha Pun; Maria F Gallo
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2014-03-30

8.  [Ambulatory vasectomy. Risks and complications].

Authors:  J Leissner; F Reiher; M Böhm; E P Allhoff
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 0.639

9.  Male contraception: mechanical, hormonal and non-hormonal methods.

Authors:  R F A Weber; G R Dohle
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2003-10-21       Impact factor: 4.226

10.  Apoptosis in testicular tissue of rats after vasectomy: evaluation of eNOS, iNOS immunoreactivities and the effects of ozone therapy.

Authors:  Serhan Alpcan; Halil Başar; Tolga Reşat Aydos; Oğuz Kul; Üçler Kısa; Murad Mehmet Başar
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2014-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.