Literature DB >> 10784304

Incidence and mortality of severe sepsis in surgical intensive care patients: the influence of patient gender on disease process and outcome.

M W Wichmann1, D Inthorn, H J Andress, F W Schildberg.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Laboratory studies demonstrated significant detrimental effects of male sex-steroids (testosterone) on immune functions following hemorrhagic shock and soft-tissue trauma. Moreover, better survival of female mice subjected to severe sepsis was observed when compared to male animals. The aims of the present study were to evaluate whether or not gender differences regarding incidence and mortality of severe sepsis do exist in surgical intensive care patients and to elucidate the influence of patient age on incidence and mortality of severe sepsis/septic shock.
DESIGN: Data base review of prospectively collected data from surgical intensive care patients.
SETTING: Surgical intensive care unit of the department of surgery of a university hospital. PATIENTS: Prospectively collected data of 4,218 intensive care patients (2,709 male, 1,509 female).
RESULTS: Significantly fewer female patients were referred to the intensive care unit (6.6 % vs 10.8 % of all patients; P < 0.05) leading to a significantly smaller proportion of female intensive care patients (35.8% vs 64.2%). No gender differences regarding number of failing organs or surgical procedure (exception vascular surgery) were observed in patients with and without severe sepsis/septic shock, indicating that the patients studied are comparable regarding general health prior to admission to SICU. Among all female patients referred to SICU only 7.6 % developed severe sepsis/septic shock, while 10.4% of all male patients suffered from severe sepsis or septic shock (P < 0.05). This gender difference results from a significantly lower incidence of severe sepsis/ septic shock in female patients between 60 and 79 years. No gender difference regarding mortality rates of severe sepsis/septic shock was observed (men 64.9 %, women 65.5%).
CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate a significantly smaller number of female patients requiring intensive care as well as a significantly lower incidence of severe sepsis/septic shock in female intensive care patients. Mortality from severe sepsis/ septic shock, however, is not affected by gender.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10784304     DOI: 10.1007/s001340050041

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Intensive Care Med        ISSN: 0342-4642            Impact factor:   17.440


  86 in total

Review 1.  Gender dimorphism in immune responses following trauma and hemorrhage.

Authors:  Yukihiro Yokoyama; Martin G Schwacha; T S Anantha Samy; Kirby I Bland; Irshad H Chaudry
Journal:  Immunol Res       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 2.829

2.  Multivariate analysis of cytokine responses identifies distinctive sensitivities to lipopolysaccharide in humans.

Authors:  David D Duncan; Lorrie Tiberio; John H Eldridge
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 3.441

3.  Risk factors for 90-day and 180-day mortality in hospitalised patients with pressure ulcers.

Authors:  Anna Flattau; Arthur E Blank
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2012-06-28       Impact factor: 3.315

4.  A clinically applicable porcine model of septic and ischemia/reperfusion-induced shock and multiple organ injury.

Authors:  Brian D Kubiak; Scott P Albert; Louis A Gatto; Christopher J Vieau; Shreyas K Roy; Kathleen P Snyder; Kristopher G Maier; Gary F Nieman
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2010-11-12       Impact factor: 2.192

5.  Effects of buprenorphine on a cecal ligation and puncture model in C57BL/6 mice.

Authors:  Tara M Cotroneo; Kelly M S Hugunin; Katherine A Shuster; Hae J Hwang; Bala N Kakaraparthi; Jean A Nemzek-Hamlin
Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 1.232

Review 6.  Sexual dimorphism in innate immune responses to infectious organisms.

Authors:  Ian Marriott; Yvette M Huet-Hudson
Journal:  Immunol Res       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 2.829

Review 7.  Which gender is better positioned in the process of liver surgery? Male or female?

Authors:  Yukihiro Yokoyama; Masato Nagino; Yuji Nimura
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2007-09-26       Impact factor: 2.549

8.  Prognostic factors in critically ill patients suffering from secondary peritonitis: a retrospective, observational, survival time analysis.

Authors:  Christian P Schneider; Carol Seyboth; Markus Vilsmaier; Helmut Küchenhoff; Benjamin Hofner; Karl-Walter Jauch; Wolfgang H Hartl
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 3.352

9.  Metastatic-promoting effects of LPS: sexual dimorphism and mediation by catecholamines and prostaglandins.

Authors:  Ranit Naor; Vered Domankevich; Shaily Shemer; Luba Sominsky; Ella Rosenne; Ben Levi; Shamgar Ben-Eliyahu
Journal:  Brain Behav Immun       Date:  2008-10-08       Impact factor: 7.217

Review 10.  The role of estrogen and receptor agonists in maintaining organ function after trauma-hemorrhage.

Authors:  Huang-Ping Yu; Irshad H Chaudry
Journal:  Shock       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 3.454

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.