Literature DB >> 10783808

Modeling human fertility in the presence of measurement error.

D B Dunson1, C R Weinberg.   

Abstract

The probability of conception in a given menstrual cycle is closely related to the timing of intercourse relative to ovulation. Although commonly used markers of time of ovulation are known to be error prone, most fertility models assume the day of ovulation is measured without error. We develop a mixture model that allows the day to be misspecified. We assume that the measurement errors are i.i.d. across menstrual cycles. Heterogeneity among couples in the per cycle likelihood of conception is accounted for using a beta mixture model. Bayesian estimation is straightforward using Markov chain Monte Carlo techniques. The methods are applied to a prospective study of couples at risk of pregnancy. In the absence of validation data or multiple independent markers of ovulation, the identifiability of the measurement error distribution depends on the assumed model. Thus, the results of studies relating the timing of intercourse to the probability of conception should be interpreted cautiously.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10783808     DOI: 10.1111/j.0006-341x.2000.00288.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biometrics        ISSN: 0006-341X            Impact factor:   2.571


  3 in total

1.  Hybrid pooled-unpooled design for cost-efficient measurement of biomarkers.

Authors:  Enrique F Schisterman; Albert Vexler; Sunni L Mumford; Neil J Perkins
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2010-02-28       Impact factor: 2.373

Review 2.  Bayesian demography 250 years after Bayes.

Authors:  Jakub Bijak; John Bryant
Journal:  Popul Stud (Camb)       Date:  2016-02-23

3.  The forecasting of menstruation based on a state-space modeling of basal body temperature time series.

Authors:  Keiichi Fukaya; Ai Kawamori; Yutaka Osada; Masumi Kitazawa; Makio Ishiguro
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2017-05-22       Impact factor: 2.373

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.