Literature DB >> 10782897

Gastric cancer in very young adults: apropos four patients and a review of the literature.

R Kath1, J Fiehler, C P Schneider, K Höffken.   

Abstract

Whether gastric cancer in young adults differs from gastric cancer in older patients has been a controversial issue. It has long been suspected that young patients with gastric cancer have different biological features with a more aggressive course of disease and a poorer prognosis than older patients. This, however, has not been firmly substantiated. We report on the clinical course of four patients (three female and one male) with locally advanced (n = 1) or metastasized (n = 3) non-resectable gastric cancer diagnosed under the age of 29 years (23, 25, 27, 28 years). Prior to diagnosis, all three women had recently been pregnant (1-22 months). Diagnosis was endoscopically biopsy-proven and staging work-up was performed by primary explorative surgery (n = 1), laparoscopy and explorative surgery (n = 1) or CAT scan and ultrasound (n = 2). The delay between initial symptoms and diagnosis was 8-22 weeks (median, 10 weeks). The histology was signet-ring cell (n = 2) or undifferentiated (n = 2) gastric cancer. All patients had the diffuse type of gastric cancer according to Lauren. Patients were treated with the FLAP polychemotherapy regimen consisting of leucovorin, 5-fluorouracil, doxorubicin and cisplatinum, as previously reported. The best response after chemotherapy was partial in two patients. Two patients showed progressive disease. Secondary surgery was performed in three responding patients (one of them responded only locally). One patient achieved no evidence of disease after complete tumor resection (R0). In two patients surgery was palliative (R2/exploration). Three patients died 6, 4 and 8 months after diagnosis. One patient is still alive. In our series, very young adults with gastric cancer had adverse clinical and pathological features. In accordance with other reports, we observed a predominance of female patients and a possible association with recent pregnancies. Though the delay between the first symptoms and diagnosis in our patients was no different from that reported for older patients, special emphasis should be given to prompt referral and diagnostic investigations, ensuring the diagnosis of gastric cancer early in the course of disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10782897     DOI: 10.1007/s004320050038

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0171-5216            Impact factor:   4.553


  19 in total

1.  Clinicopathological characteristics and prognostic analysis of gastric cancer in the young adult in China.

Authors:  Miao-zhen Qiu; Zhi-qiang Wang; Dong-sheng Zhang; Hui-yan Luo; Zhi-wei Zhou; Feng-hua Wang; Yu-hong Li; Wen-qi Jiang; Rui-hua Xu
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2010-12-23

2.  Predicting individual survival after gastric cancer resection: validation of a U.S.-derived nomogram at a single high-volume center in Europe.

Authors:  Alexander R Novotny; Christoph Schuhmacher; Raymonde Busch; Michael W Kattan; Murray F Brennan; Jörg Rüdiger Siewert
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  Clinicopathological comparison between young and old age patients with gastric adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Kamal E Bani-Hani
Journal:  Int J Gastrointest Cancer       Date:  2005

4.  Gastric adenocarcinoma in children and adolescents.

Authors:  Vivek Subbiah; Gauri Varadhachary; Cynthia E Herzog; Winston W Huh
Journal:  Pediatr Blood Cancer       Date:  2011-01-24       Impact factor: 3.167

5.  Clinicopathologic and molecular features associated with patient age in gastric cancer.

Authors:  Ji Yeon Seo; Eun Hyo Jin; Hyun Jin Jo; Hyuk Yoon; Cheol Min Shin; Young Soo Park; Nayoung Kim; Hyun Chae Jung; Dong Ho Lee
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-06-14       Impact factor: 5.742

6.  Clinicopathological profile and long-term outcome in young adults with gastric cancer: multicenter evaluation of 214 patients.

Authors:  Jan Kulig; Tadeusz Popiela; Piotr Kolodziejczyk; Marek Sierzega; Joanna Jedrys; Antoni M Szczepanik
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2007-07-06       Impact factor: 3.445

7.  Different patterns in the prognostic value of age for bladder cancer-specific survival depending on tumor stages.

Authors:  Huan Feng; Wei Zhang; Jiajun Li; Xiaozhe Lu
Journal:  Am J Cancer Res       Date:  2015-05-15       Impact factor: 6.166

8.  Sister Mary Joseph's nodule as the first sign of pregnancy-associated gastric cancer: a case report.

Authors:  Sara Fill; Andrei Taran; Hans-Ulrich Schulz; Stefan Kahl; Thomas Kalinski; Bobbie Smith; Serban-Dan Costa
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2008-02-14       Impact factor: 5.742

9.  Heregulin β-1 induces loss of cell-cell contact and enhances expression of MUC1 at the cell surface in HCC2998 and MKN45-1 cells.

Authors:  Rintaro Okoshi; Chung-Li Shu; Sayoko Ihara; Yasuhisa Fukui
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-12-22       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  DNA copy number changes in young gastric cancer patients with special reference to chromosome 19.

Authors:  A Varis; B van Rees; M Weterman; A Ristimäki; J Offerhaus; S Knuutila
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2003-06-16       Impact factor: 7.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.