Literature DB >> 10782572

Comparison between different routes of progesterone administration as luteal phase support in infertility treatments.

A Tavaniotou1, J Smitz, C Bourgain, P Devroey.   

Abstract

Different routes of natural progesterone supplementation have been tried as luteal phase support in infertility treatments. Orally administered progesterone is rapidly metabolized in the gastrointestinal tract and its use has proved to be inferior to i.m. and vaginal routes. Progesterone i.m. achieves serum progesterone values that are within the range of luteal phase and results in sufficient secretory transformation of the endometrium and satisfactory pregnancy rates. The comparison between i.m. and vaginal progesterone has led to controversial results as regards the superiority of one or the other in inducing secretory endometrial transformation. However, there is increasing evidence in the literature to favour the use of vaginal progesterone. Vaginally administered progesterone achieves adequate endometrial secretory transformation but its pharmacokinetic properties are greatly dependent on the formulation used. After vaginal progesterone application, discrepancies have been detected between serum progesterone values and histological endometrial features. Vaginally administered progesterone results in adequate secretory endometrial transformation, despite serum progesterone values lower than those observed after i.m. administration, even if they are lower than those observed during the luteal phase of the natural cycle. This discrepancy is indicative of the first uterine pass effect and therefore of a better bioavailability of progesterone in the uterus, with minimal systematic undesirable effects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10782572     DOI: 10.1093/humupd/6.2.139

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod Update        ISSN: 1355-4786            Impact factor:   15.610


  34 in total

1.  Has ART Finally Got a Patient-Friendly Progesterone?

Authors:  Gautam N Allahbadia
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol India       Date:  2015-10

Review 2.  Timing luteal support in assisted reproductive technology: a systematic review.

Authors:  Matthew T Connell; Jennifer M Szatkowski; Nancy Terry; Alan H DeCherney; Anthony M Propst; Micah J Hill
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2015-01-29       Impact factor: 7.329

Review 3.  Progestin treatment for the prevention of preterm birth.

Authors:  Miha Lucovnik; Ruben J Kuon; Linda R Chambliss; William L Maner; Shao-Qing Shi; Leili Shi; James Balducci; Robert E Garfield
Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand       Date:  2011-06-27       Impact factor: 3.636

4.  Comparison of daily vaginal progesterone gel plus weekly intramuscular progesterone with daily intramuscular progesterone for luteal phase support in single, autologous euploid frozen-thawed embryo transfers.

Authors:  Mehmet Resit Asoglu; Cem Celik; Lale Susan Karakis; Necati Findikli; Meral Gultomruk; Mustafa Bahceci
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2019-05-18       Impact factor: 3.412

5.  Relationship between serum progesterone (P) levels and pregnancy outcome: lessons from artificial cycles when using vaginal natural micronized progesterone.

Authors:  Elena Labarta
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2020-06-23       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 6.  Safety of drugs used in assisted reproduction techniques.

Authors:  Talha Al-Shawaf; Ariel Zosmer; Martha Dirnfeld; Gedis Grudzinskas
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 5.606

7.  Pharmacokinetics of vaginal progesterone in pregnancy.

Authors:  Rupsa C Boelig; Athena F Zuppa; Walter K Kraft; Steve Caritis
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2019-06-15       Impact factor: 8.661

8.  The role of progesterone in prevention of preterm birth.

Authors:  Jodie M Dodd; Caroline A Crowther
Journal:  Int J Womens Health       Date:  2010-08-09

9.  Live birth rates and safety profile using dydrogesterone for luteal phase support in assisted reproductive techniques.

Authors:  Ravichandran Nadarajah; Hemashree Rajesh; Ker Yi Wong; Fazlin Faisal; Su Ling Yu
Journal:  Singapore Med J       Date:  2016-04-19       Impact factor: 1.858

10.  Development of a mucoinert progesterone nanosuspension for safer and more effective prevention of preterm birth.

Authors:  Thuy Hoang; Hannah Zierden; Abhijit Date; Jairo Ortiz; Sanjeev Gumber; Nicole Anders; Ping He; James Segars; Justin Hanes; Mala Mahendroo; Laura M Ensign
Journal:  J Control Release       Date:  2018-12-28       Impact factor: 9.776

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.