Literature DB >> 27090598

Live birth rates and safety profile using dydrogesterone for luteal phase support in assisted reproductive techniques.

Ravichandran Nadarajah1, Hemashree Rajesh1, Ker Yi Wong1, Fazlin Faisal1, Su Ling Yu1.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Assisted reproductive techniques (ARTs) result in a deficient luteal phase, requiring the administration of intramuscular, intravaginal or oral exogenous progesterone. Dydrogesterone, an oral retroprogesterone with good bioavailability, has been used in assisted reproductive cycles with outcomes that are comparable to those of vaginal or intramuscular progesterone. However, there are limited reviews on its use for luteal phase support in ARTs, in terms of pregnancy outcomes and associated fetal anomalies. This study aimed to review the live birth rates and associated fetal anomalies of women who were given dydrogesterone for luteal phase support in assisted reproductive cycles at a tertiary hospital in Singapore.
METHODS: This retrospective descriptive study included 1,050 women who underwent in vitro fertilisation/intracytoplasmic sperm injection at the Centre for Assisted Reproduction of Singapore General Hospital between 2000 and 2011. The women were given dydrogesterone for luteal phase support. The main outcome measures were rates of pregnancy, live birth, miscarriage and fetal anomalies.
RESULTS: The pregnancy and live birth rates were 34.7% and 27.7%, respectively. Among those who achieved pregnancy, 17.0% miscarried, 0.8% had ectopic pregnancies and 0.3% had molar pregnancies. Fetal anomalies were detected in 1.9% of pregnancies, all of which were terminated by choice.
CONCLUSION: Since the outcomes of dydrogesterone are comparable to those of intramuscular and vaginal progesterone, it is a reasonable option to provide luteal phase support for women who are uncomfortable with injections or vaginal insertions. Randomised controlled studies are needed to determine the optimal dosage of dydrogesterone for luteal phase support in ARTs. Copyright: © Singapore Medical Association

Entities:  

Keywords:  dydrogesterone; fetal anomalies; live birth; luteal phase support; pregnancy

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27090598      PMCID: PMC5474524          DOI: 10.11622/smedj.2016080

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Singapore Med J        ISSN: 0037-5675            Impact factor:   1.858


  23 in total

1.  Efficacy of progesterone support for pregnancy in women with recurrent miscarriage. A meta-analysis of controlled trials.

Authors:  S Daya
Journal:  Br J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  1989-03

Review 2.  Corpus luteum defects.

Authors:  V Insler
Journal:  Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 1.927

3.  Pregnancy outcomes from in-vitro fertilisation and intracytoplasmic sperm injection: a comparison.

Authors:  H Rajesh; H A C Yap; Y J Wu
Journal:  Singapore Med J       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 1.858

4.  [Luteal support after administration of an LHRH analog for in vitro fertilization. Superiority of vaginal progesterone in comparison with oral progesterone].

Authors:  J Buvat; G Marcolin; C Guittard; J L Dehaene; J C Herbaut; A L Louvet
Journal:  Presse Med       Date:  1990-03-24       Impact factor: 1.228

5.  Plasma levels of progesterone after vaginal, rectal, or intramuscular administration of progesterone.

Authors:  S J Nillius; E D Johansson
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1971-06-15       Impact factor: 8.661

6.  Oral dydrogesterone versus intravaginal micronised progesterone as luteal phase support in assisted reproductive technology (ART) cycles: results of a randomised study.

Authors:  Baidya Nath Chakravarty; Hasibul Hasan Shirazee; Purvita Dam; Sourendra Kanta Goswami; Ratna Chatterjee; Sanghamitra Ghosh
Journal:  J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol       Date:  2005-10-05       Impact factor: 4.292

Review 7.  Issues in the etiology of recurrent spontaneous abortion.

Authors:  S Daya
Journal:  Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 1.927

8.  A meta-analysis of controlled studies comparing major malformation rates in IVF and ICSI infants with naturally conceived children.

Authors:  Alfred A Rimm; Alyce C Katayama; Mireya Diaz; K Paul Katayama
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 9.  Dydrogesterone use during pregnancy: overview of birth defects reported since 1977.

Authors:  Annette Queisser-Luft
Journal:  Early Hum Dev       Date:  2009-02-03       Impact factor: 2.079

10.  Comparison of oral dydrogesterone with suppository vaginal progesterone for luteal-phase support in in vitro fertilization (IVF): A randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Saghar Salehpour; Maryam Tamimi; Nasrin Saharkhiz
Journal:  Iran J Reprod Med       Date:  2013-11
View more
  3 in total

1.  Progress in obstetrics and gynaecology - evidence-based practices and practice-based evidence reviews.

Authors:  Kok Hian Tan
Journal:  Singapore Med J       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 1.858

2.  Questionable recommendation for LPS for IVF/ICSI in ESHRE guideline 2019: ovarian stimulation for IVF/ICSI.

Authors:  Paul C M Piette
Journal:  Hum Reprod Open       Date:  2021-03-03

3.  Reply: Questionable recommendation for LPS for IVF/ICSI in ESHRE guideline 2019: ovarian stimulation for IVF/ICSI.

Authors:  Frank Broekmans; Peter Humaidan; George Lainas; Mira Töyli; Nathalie Le Clef; Nathalie Vermeulen
Journal:  Hum Reprod Open       Date:  2021-03-03
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.