Literature DB >> 10782435

Stimulus and temporal cues in classical conditioning.

K Kirkpatrick1, R M Church.   

Abstract

In 2 experiments, separate groups of rats were given stimulus conditioning, temporal conditioning, untreated control and (in Experiment 2) learned irrelevance control procedures, followed by a compound with both stimulus and temporal cues. Stimulus conditioning consisted of a random 15-s duration conditioned stimulus (CS) followed by food; temporal conditioning consisted of food-food intervals of fixed 90 s (Experiment 1) or fixed 75 + random 15 s (Experiment 2). The stimulus group abruptly increased responding after CS onset, and the temporal group gradually increased responding over the food-food interval. When the food-food interval was fixed 90 s, the temporal cue exerted stronger control in the compound, whereas when the food-food interval was fixed 75 + random 15 s, the stimulus cue exerted stronger control. The strength of conditioning, temporal gradients of responding, and cue competition effects appear to reflect simultaneous timing of multiple intervals.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10782435     DOI: 10.1037//0097-7403.26.2.206

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process        ISSN: 0097-7403


  15 in total

1.  Dynamics of temporal discrimination.

Authors:  Paulo Guilhardi; Russell M Church
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 1.986

2.  Unraveling sources of stimulus control in a temporal discrimination task.

Authors:  Carlos Pinto; Armando Machado
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 1.986

3.  Tracking of the expected time to reinforcement in temporal conditioning procedures.

Authors:  Kimberly Kirkpatrick; Russell M Church
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 1.986

4.  Impulsive responding on the peak-interval procedure.

Authors:  Matthew S Matell; George S Portugal
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2006-10-04       Impact factor: 1.777

5.  Time and Associative Learning.

Authors:  Peter D Balsam; Michael R Drew; C R Gallistel
Journal:  Comp Cogn Behav Rev       Date:  2010

6.  Factors that influence negative summation in a spatial-search task with pigeons.

Authors:  Kenneth J Leising; Kosuke Sawa; Aaron P Blaisdell
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2012-04-04       Impact factor: 1.777

7.  Excitatory conditioning to the interoceptive nicotine stimulus blocks subsequent conditioning to an exteroceptive light stimulus.

Authors:  Jennifer E Murray; Rick A Bevins
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2011-03-17       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  Conditioned [corrected] stimulus informativeness governs conditioned stimulus-unconditioned stimulus associability.

Authors:  Ryan D Ward; C R Gallistel; Greg Jensen; Vanessa L Richards; Stephen Fairhurst; Peter D Balsam
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  2012-04-02

Review 9.  It's the information!

Authors:  Ryan D Ward; C R Gallistel; Peter D Balsam
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2013-02-04       Impact factor: 1.777

10.  Neural mechanisms of human temporal fear conditioning.

Authors:  Nathaniel G Harnett; Joshua R Shumen; Pooja A Wagle; Kimberly H Wood; Muriah D Wheelock; James H Baños; David C Knight
Journal:  Neurobiol Learn Mem       Date:  2016-09-28       Impact factor: 2.877

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.