Literature DB >> 10781718

Catalytic effects of carbon sorbents for mercury capture

.   

Abstract

Activated carbon sorbents have the potential to be an effective means of mercury control in combustion systems. Reactions of activated carbons in flow systems with mercury and gas stream components were investigated to determine the types of chemical interactions that occur on the sorbent surface. The effects of carbon type, particle size, temperature, and reactive gases were studied. Sorption kinetics and capacities for lignite- and bituminous-based carbons were compared with those for catalytic carbons at temperatures of 107 degrees C, 150 degrees C, and 163 degrees C. In the air and baseline gas studies, the catalytic carbons exhibited far better sorption than the lignite- and bituminous-derived carbons. With the catalytic carbons, the greater sorption kinetics and capacity in an air stream or baseline gas composition compared with nitrogen provides a clear demonstration that O(2) is required in the gas stream for higher reactivities and capacities. Thus, a catalytic chemisorption mechanism predominates for the sorption of mercury at these conditions. The reaction kinetics are inversely proportional to the temperature, indicating that a preliminary physisorption step with mercury associating with a surface site is rate-determining. In synthetic flue gas streams containing HCl (50 ppm), the sorption kinetics of the catalytic carbon are slightly inferior to those of lignite-based carbon. Thus, the reaction is dominated by a different interaction, where HCl reacts with mercury on the carbon surface and the oxidation sites on the catalytic carbon apparently have no advantage. Granular and fine-particle carbons gave similar results in flue gas streams.

Entities:  

Year:  2000        PMID: 10781718     DOI: 10.1016/s0304-3894(99)00199-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hazard Mater        ISSN: 0304-3894            Impact factor:   10.588


  8 in total

1.  The Effect of Wildfire on Soil Mercury Concentrations in Southern California Watersheds.

Authors:  Megan P Burke; Terri S Hogue; Marcia Ferreira; Carolina B Mendez; Bridget Navarro; Sonya Lopez; Jennifer A Jay
Journal:  Water Air Soil Pollut       Date:  2010-03-16       Impact factor: 2.520

2.  Adsorption of Mercury on Chlorine-Modified Activated Carbon: Breakthrough Curves and Temperature-Programmed Desorption.

Authors:  Julian Steinhaus; Christoph Pasel; Christian Bläker; Dieter Bathen
Journal:  ACS Omega       Date:  2022-06-28

Review 3.  Control of mercury vapor emissions from combustion flue gas.

Authors:  Rong Yan; David Tee Liang; Joo Hwa Tay
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 4.223

4.  Mercury capture by native fly ash carbons in coal-fired power plants.

Authors:  James C Hower; Constance L Senior; Eric M Suuberg; Robert H Hurt; Jennifer L Wilcox; Edwin S Olson
Journal:  Prog Energy Combust Sci       Date:  2010-08-01

5.  High capacity mercury adsorption on freshly ozone-treated carbon surfaces.

Authors:  Shawn Manchester; Xuelei Wang; Indrek Kulaots; Yuming Gao; Robert H Hurt
Journal:  Carbon N Y       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 9.594

6.  Influence of Oxygen on Hg0 Adsorption on Non-Impregnated Activated Carbons.

Authors:  Jonas M Ambrosy; Christoph Pasel; Michael Luckas; Margot Bittig; Dieter Bathen
Journal:  ACS Omega       Date:  2020-07-08

7.  Impact of H2O on the Adsorption of Hg0 on Activated Carbon.

Authors:  Julian Steinhaus; Christoph Pasel; Christian Bläker; Dieter Bathen
Journal:  ACS Omega       Date:  2021-06-24

8.  Mercury vapor release from broken compact fluorescent lamps and in situ capture by new nanomaterial sorbents.

Authors:  Natalie C Johnson; Shawn Manchester; Love Sarin; Yuming Gao; Indrek Kulaots; Robert H Hurt
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2008-08-01       Impact factor: 9.028

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.