Literature DB >> 14690030

Control of mercury vapor emissions from combustion flue gas.

Rong Yan1, David Tee Liang, Joo Hwa Tay.   

Abstract

GOAL, SCOPE AND
BACKGROUND: Mercury (Hg) emission from combustion flue gas is a significant environmental concern due to its toxicity and high volatility. A number of the research efforts have been carried out in the past decade exploiting mercury emission, monitoring and control from combustion flue gases. Most recently, increasing activities are focused on evaluating the behavior of mercury in coal combustion systems and developing novel Hg control technologies. This is partly due to the new regulatory requirement on mercury emissions from coal-fired combustors to be enacted under the U.S. Title III of the 1990 Clean Air Act Amendments. The aim of this review work is to better understand the state-of-the-art technologies of flue gas mercury control and identify the gaps of knowledge hence areas for further opportunities in research and development. MAIN FEATURES: This paper examines mercury behaviors in combustion systems through a comprehensive review of the available literature. About 70 published papers and reports were cited and studied. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: This paper summarizes the mechanisms of formation of mercury containing compounds during combustion, its speciation and reaction in flue gas, as well as subsequent mobilization in the environment. It also provides a review of the current techniques designed for real-time, continuous emission monitoring (CEM) for mercury. Most importantly, current flue gas mercury control technologies are reviewed while activated carbon adsorption, a technology that offers the greatest potential for the control of gas-phase mercury emissions, is highlighted. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: Although much progress has been achieved in the last decade, techniques developed for the monitoring and control of mercury from combustion flue gases are not yet mature and gaps in knowledge exist for further advancement. More R&D efforts are required for the effective control of Hg emissions and the main focuses are identified.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14690030     DOI: 10.1065/espr2003.04.149

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int        ISSN: 0944-1344            Impact factor:   4.223


  12 in total

1.  Preliminary estimates of performance and cost of mercury control technology applications on electric utility boilers.

Authors:  R K Srivastava; C B Sedman; J D Kilgroe; D Smith; S Renninger
Journal:  J Air Waste Manag Assoc       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 2.235

Review 2.  Control of toxic metal emissions from combustors using sorbents: a review.

Authors:  P Biswas; C Y Wu
Journal:  J Air Waste Manag Assoc       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 2.235

3.  Uptake of Elemental Mercury Vapors by Activated Carbons.

Authors:  Radisav D Vidic; J Brendan McLaughlin
Journal:  J Air Waste Manag Assoc       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 2.235

4.  Low Concentration Mercury Sorption Mechanisms and Control by Calcium-Based Sorbents: Application in Coal-Fired Processes.

Authors:  S Behrooz Ghorishi; Charles B Sedman
Journal:  J Air Waste Manag Assoc       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 2.235

5.  Factors Affecting Mercury Control in Utility Flue Gas Using Activated Carbon.

Authors:  Todd R Carey; Oliver W Hargrove; Carl F Richardson; Ramsay Chang; Frank B Meserole
Journal:  J Air Waste Manag Assoc       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 2.235

6.  A study of gas-phase mercury speciation using detailed chemical kinetics.

Authors:  J R Edwards; R K Srivastava; J D Kilgroe
Journal:  J Air Waste Manag Assoc       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 2.235

7.  Characterization of activated carbon fiber filters for pressure drop, submicrometer particulate collection, and mercury capture.

Authors:  T Hayashi; T G Lee; M Hazelwood; E Hedrick; P Biswas
Journal:  J Air Waste Manag Assoc       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 2.235

8.  Mercury Measurement and Its Control: What We Know, Have Learned, and Need to Further Investigate.

Authors:  T D Brown; D N Smith; R A Hargis; W J O'Dowd
Journal:  J Air Waste Manag Assoc       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 2.235

9.  Modeling Mercury Removal by Sorbent Injection.

Authors:  F B Meserole; R Chang; T R Carey; J Machac; C F Richardson
Journal:  J Air Waste Manag Assoc       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 2.235

10.  Effects of sulfur impregnation temperature on the properties and mercury adsorption capacities of activated carbon fibers (ACFs).

Authors:  H C Hsi; M J Rood; M Rostam-Abadi; S Chen; R Chang
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2001-07-01       Impact factor: 9.028

View more
  2 in total

1.  Mercury distribution in seawater discharged from a coal-fired power plant equipped with a seawater flue gas desulfurization system.

Authors:  Xiyao Liu; Lumin Sun; Dongxing Yuan; Liqian Yin; Jinsheng Chen; Yaoxing Liu; Chengyu Liu; Ying Liang; Fangfang Lin
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2011-03-29       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Distribution of mercury and other trace metals in the sediments of Cochin estuary (a Ramsar site), Kerala, India.

Authors:  S Dipu; Anju A Kumar
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2012-12-09       Impact factor: 2.513

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.