Literature DB >> 10780688

Factors influencing the outcome of degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis.

M Mariconda1, G Zanforlino, G A Celestino, S Brancaleone, R Fava, C Milano.   

Abstract

The objective of this study was to evaluate the influence of decreased dural sac cross-sectional area and baseline clinical parameters on the outcome of patients treated surgically or conservatively for lumbar spinal stenosis. Computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging scans of 37 patients were digitized and the dural sac cross-sectional area was calculated. This parameter and baseline clinical, socioeconomic, and anthropometric data of the patients were correlated with 1-year and 2-year follow-up data. The decrease in dural sac cross-sectional area negatively affected walking capacity on follow-up controls in patients treated conservatively, whereas such a relation was not observed among surgically treated patients. Female sex was the main parameter that worsened the global outcome of degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis, particularly after surgical treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10780688     DOI: 10.1097/00002517-200004000-00007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Spinal Disord        ISSN: 0895-0385


  13 in total

1.  Quantitative ultrasound measurements of the calcaneus in the prediction of lumbar spine degeneration.

Authors:  M Mariconda; G Lotti; R Fava; R Midolo; C Longo; C Milano
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2004-02-10       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  A novel method for the quantitative evaluation of lumbar spinal stenosis.

Authors:  Fengyu Zheng; James C Farmer; Harvinder S Sandhu; Patrick F O'Leary
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2006-09

3.  Who should have surgery for spinal stenosis? Treatment effect predictors in SPORT.

Authors:  Adam Pearson; Jon Lurie; Tor Tosteson; Wenyan Zhao; William Abdu; James N Weinstein
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2012-10-01       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  Early postoperative MRI in detecting hematoma and dural compression after lumbar spinal decompression: prospective study of asymptomatic patients in comparison to patients requiring surgical revision.

Authors:  Massimo A Leonardi; M Zanetti; N Saupe; K Min
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-06-17       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Magnetic resonance imaging predictors of surgical outcome in degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis.

Authors:  Banu Alicioglu; Baris Yilmaz; Nail Bulakbasi; Cem Copuroglu; Erol Yalniz; Bilal Aykac; Devrim Ulas Urut
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2012-09-04       Impact factor: 2.374

6.  Degenerative spondylolisthesis versus spinal stenosis: does a slip matter? Comparison of baseline characteristics and outcomes (SPORT).

Authors:  Adam Pearson; Emily Blood; Jon Lurie; Tor Tosteson; William A Abdu; Alan Hillibrand; Keith Bridwell; James Weinstein
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2010-02-01       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Lumbar spinal stenosis: assessment of cauda equina involvement by electrophysiological recordings.

Authors:  D Egli; O Hausmann; M Schmid; N Boos; V Dietz; A Curt
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2007-04-11       Impact factor: 4.849

8.  Who should undergo surgery for degenerative spondylolisthesis? Treatment effect predictors in SPORT.

Authors:  Adam M Pearson; Jon D Lurie; Tor D Tosteson; Wenyan Zhao; William A Abdu; James N Weinstein
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2013-10-01       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Prognosis of surgical treatment for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: a prospective cohort study of clinical outcomes and health-related quality of life across gender and age groups.

Authors:  Elisabeth Thornes; Nikolaos Ikonomou; Margreth Grotle
Journal:  Open Orthop J       Date:  2011-11-04

10.  A comparison of autologous and homologous transfusions in spinal fusion.

Authors:  Moon-Soo Park; Seong-Hwan Moon; Hak-Sun Kim; Soo-Bong Hahn; Hui-Wan Park; Si-Young Park; Hwan-Mo Lee
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2006-12-31       Impact factor: 2.759

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.