Literature DB >> 10780608

Nonskeletal cervical spine injuries: epidemiology and diagnostic pitfalls.

D Demetriades1, K Charalambides, S Chahwan, D Hanpeter, K Alo, G Velmahos, J Murray, J Asensio.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cervical spine injuries are the most commonly missed severe injuries with serious implications for the patient and physician. The diagnosis of subluxations or spinal cord injuries in the absence of vertebral fractures, especially in unevaluable patients, poses a major challenge. The objective of this study was to study the incidence and type of cervical spine trauma according to mechanism of injury; identify problems and pitfalls in the diagnosis of nonskeletal cervical spine injuries.
METHODS: Retrospective study of all C-spine injuries caused by traffic accidents or falls admitted over a 5-year period at a large Level I trauma center. Data were obtained from the trauma registry, review of patient charts, and radiology reports.
RESULTS: During the study period, there were 14,755 admissions due to traffic injuries or falls who met trauma center criteria. There were 292 patients with C-spine injuries, for an overall incidence of 2.0% (3.4% in car occupants, 2.8% for pedestrians, 1.9% for motorcycle riders, and 0.9% for falls). The incidence of C-spine injuries in patients with a Glasgow Coma Scale score of 13 to 15 was 1.4%, 9 to 12 was 6.8%, and in < or =8 was 10.2% (p < 0.05). Of C-spine injuries, 85.6% (250 patients) were a vertebral fracture, 10.6% of the injuries (31 patients) were subluxation without fractures, and 3.8% (11 patients) were an isolated spinal cord injury without fracture or subluxation. Of the 31 patients with isolated subluxations, one-third required an early endotracheal intubation before clinical evaluation of the spine, because of associated severe head injury or hypotension. Adequate lateral C-spine films diagnosed or suspected 30 of the 31 subluxations (96.8%). The combination of plain films and computed tomographic (CT) scan diagnosed or suspected all injuries. Of the 11 patients with isolated cord injury, 27.3% required early intubation before clinical evaluation of the spine. The diagnosis of cord injury was made on admission in only five patients (45.5%). In three patients, the neurologic examination on admission was normal and neurologic deficits appeared a few hours later. In the remaining three patients (two intubated, one intoxicated), the diagnosis was missed clinically and radiologically.
CONCLUSIONS: Isolated nonskeletal C-spine injuries are rare but potentially catastrophic because of the high incidence of neurologic deficits and missed diagnosis. In subluxations, the combination of an adequate lateral film and CT scan was reliable in diagnosing or highly suspecting the injury. A large prospective study is needed to confirm these findings, before a recommendation is made to remove the cervical collar if the findings of these investigations are normal. However, in isolated cord injuries, the diagnosis was often missed because of associated severe head trauma and the low sensitivity of the plain films and CT scans.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10780608     DOI: 10.1097/00005373-200004000-00022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Trauma        ISSN: 0022-5282


  22 in total

Review 1.  Spinal immobilisation for unconscious patients with multiple injuries.

Authors:  C G Morris; E P McCoy; G G Lavery; E McCoy
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-08-28

2.  [Evidence based diagnostic procedures for the determination of suspected blunt cervical spine injuries. Development of an algorithm].

Authors:  B A Leidel; K-G Kanz; W Mutschler
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 1.000

Review 3.  Prehospital use of cervical collars in trauma patients: a critical review.

Authors:  Terje Sundstrøm; Helge Asbjørnsen; Samer Habiba; Geir Arne Sunde; Knut Wester
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2013-11-06       Impact factor: 5.269

Review 4.  Cervical spine collar clearance in the obtunded adult blunt trauma patient: a systematic review and practice management guideline from the Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma.

Authors:  Mayur B Patel; Stephen S Humble; Daniel C Cullinane; Matthew A Day; Randeep S Jawa; Clinton J Devin; Margaret S Delozier; Lou M Smith; Miya A Smith; Jeannette M Capella; Andrea M Long; Joseph S Cheng; Taylor C Leath; Yngve Falck-Ytter; Elliott R Haut; John J Como
Journal:  J Trauma Acute Care Surg       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 3.313

Review 5.  Perioperative management of adult traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  Deepak Sharma; Monica S Vavilala
Journal:  Anesthesiol Clin       Date:  2012-06-13

6.  Are "normal" multidetector computed tomographic scans sufficient to allow collar removal in the trauma patient?

Authors:  Josef B Simon; Andrew J Schoenfeld; Jeffrey N Katz; Atul F Kamath; Atul Kamath; Atul Kamuth; Kirkham Wood; Christopher M Bono; Mitchel B Harris
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  2010-01

7.  National athletic trainers' association position statement: acute management of the cervical spine-injured athlete.

Authors:  Erik E Swartz; Barry P Boden; Ronald W Courson; Laura C Decoster; MaryBeth Horodyski; Susan A Norkus; Robb S Rehberg; Kevin N Waninger
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2009 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.860

8.  Hidden discoligamentous instability in cervical spine injuries: can quantitative motion analysis improve detection?

Authors:  M Mayer; J Zenner; A Auffarth; M Blocher; M Figl; H Resch; H Koller
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-06-13       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Comparative analysis of cervical spine management in a subset of severe traumatic brain injury cases using computer simulation.

Authors:  Kimbroe J Carter; C Michael Dunham; Frank Castro; Barbara Erickson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-04-22       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Perioperative management of traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  Parichat Curry; Darwin Viernes; Deepak Sharma
Journal:  Int J Crit Illn Inj Sci       Date:  2011-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.