Literature DB >> 10780028

Reading aloud polysyllabic words and nonwords: the syllabic length effect reexamined.

L Ferrand1.   

Abstract

Two experiments were run in order to reinvestigate the role of the number of syllables in naming. Experiment 1 (word naming) showed that effects of number of syllables on naming latency were observed for very low-frequency words but not for high-frequency words (thus replicating Jared & Seidenberg's, 1990, finding). In Experiment 2 (nonword naming), syllabic length effects were also obtained for nonwords. Control experiments found no effect on the latency of delayed naming of the same words and nonwords. These results suggest that naming does require syllabic decomposition, at least for very low-frequency words and nonwords in French. In particular, these data are compatible with any model of reading that postulates that reading aloud depends on the activity of two procedures: (1) a procedure that operates in parallel across a letter string (and does not generate a strong syllabic length effect) and that is the predominant process in generating responses to high-frequency words, and (2) another procedure that operates serially across a letter string (and generates a strong syllabic length effect) and that is the predominant process in generating responses to very low-frequency words and nonwords. These results are discussed in the context of the multiple-trace memory model for polysyllabic word naming (Ans, Carbonnel, & Valdois, 1998).

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10780028     DOI: 10.3758/bf03210733

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  8 in total

1.  Relation between programming time and duration of the response being programmed.

Authors:  S T Klapp; C I Erwin
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1976-11       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  Motor programming within a sequence of responses.

Authors:  S T Klapp; E Patrick Wyatt
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  1976-03       Impact factor: 1.328

3.  From print to sound in mature readers as a function of reader ability and two forms of orthographic regularity.

Authors:  M Mason
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1978-09

4.  A connectionist multiple-trace memory model for polysyllabic word reading.

Authors:  B Ans; S Carbonnel; S Valdois
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 8.934

5.  The effects of stimulus attributes upon latency of word recognition.

Authors:  J T Richardson
Journal:  Br J Psychol       Date:  1976-08

6.  Naming multisyllabic words.

Authors:  D Jared; M S Seidenberg
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  The syllable's role in word naming.

Authors:  L Ferrand; J Segui; G W Humphreys
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1997-07

8.  A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming.

Authors:  M S Seidenberg; J L McClelland
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1989-10       Impact factor: 8.934

  8 in total
  8 in total

1.  Reexamining the word length effect in visual word recognition: new evidence from the English Lexicon Project.

Authors:  Boris New; Ludovic Ferrand; Christophe Pallier; Marc Brysbaert
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2006-02

2.  Lexical and semantic age-of-acquisition effects on word naming in Spanish.

Authors:  Robert Davies; Analia Barbón; Fernando Cuetos
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2013-02

3.  Direct evidence for two different neural mechanisms for reading familiar and unfamiliar words: an intra-cerebral EEG study.

Authors:  Alexandra Juphard; Juan R Vidal; Marcela Perrone-Bertolotti; Lorella Minotti; Philippe Kahane; Jean-Philippe Lachaux; Monica Baciu
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2011-09-20       Impact factor: 3.169

4.  Acquisition of Chinese characters: the effects of character properties and individual differences among second language learners.

Authors:  Li-Jen Kuo; Tae-Jin Kim; Xinyuan Yang; Huiwen Li; Yan Liu; Haixia Wang; Jeong Hyun Park; Ying Li
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-08-03

5.  Costs and Benefits of Orthographic Inconsistency in Reading: Evidence from a Cross-Linguistic Comparison.

Authors:  Chiara Valeria Marinelli; Cristina Romani; Cristina Burani; Victoria A McGowan; Pierluigi Zoccolotti
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-06-29       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  A normative study of acronyms and acronym naming.

Authors:  Cristina Izura; David Playfoot
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2012-09

7.  Non-word reading, lexical retrieval and stuttering: comments on Packman, Onslow, Coombes and Goodwin (2001).

Authors:  James Au-Yeung; Peter Howell
Journal:  Clin Linguist Phon       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 1.346

8.  Derivational Morphology in Agrammatic Aphasia: A Comparison Between Prefixed and Suffixed Words.

Authors:  Laura Anna Ciaccio; Frank Burchert; Carlo Semenza
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2020-05-29
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.