Literature DB >> 10779460

Severe aortic stenosis with low transvalvular gradient and severe left ventricular dysfunction:result of aortic valve replacement in 52 patients.

H M Connolly1, J K Oh, H V Schaff, V L Roger, S L Osborn, D O Hodge, A J Tajik.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The outcome of aortic valve replacement in patients with severe aortic stenosis, low transvalvular gradient, and severe left ventricular dysfunction is not well known. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Between 1985 and 1995, 52 patients with left ventricular ejection fraction (EF) < or =35% and aortic stenosis with transvalvular mean gradient <30 mm Hg underwent aortic valve replacement. The mean (+/-SD) preoperative characteristics included EF, 26+/-8%; aortic valve mean gradient, 23+/-4 mm Hg; aortic valve area, 0.7+/-0.2 cm(2); and cardiac output, 3.7+/-1.2 L/min. Simultaneous coronary artery bypass graft surgery was performed in 32 patients (62%). Perioperative (30-day) mortality was 21% (11 of 52 patients). Ten additional patients died during follow-up. Advanced age (P=0.048) and small aortic prosthesis size (P=0.03) were significant predictors of hospital mortality by univariate analysis. By multivariate analysis, the only predictor of surgical mortality was smaller prosthesis size. The only predictor of postoperative survival was improvement in postoperative functional class (P=0.04). Postoperative functional improvement occurred in most patients. Postoperative EF was assessed in 93% of survivors; 74% demonstrated improvement. Positive change in EF was related to smaller preoperative aortic valve area and female sex.
CONCLUSIONS: Despite severe left ventricular dysfunction, low transvalvular mean gradient, and increased operative mortality, aortic valve replacement was associated with improved functional status. Postoperative survival was related to younger patient age and larger aortic prosthesis size, and medium-term survival was related to improved postoperative functional class.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10779460     DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.101.16.1940

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  56 in total

Review 1.  Should patients with asymptomatic mild or moderate aortic stenosis undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery also have valve replacement for their aortic stenosis?

Authors:  S H Rahimtoola
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 2.  Pathophysiology of valvular heart disease: implications for nuclear imaging.

Authors:  Blasé Carabello
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2002 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 3.  Prosthesis-patient mismatch: definition, clinical impact, and prevention.

Authors:  P Pibarot; J G Dumesnil
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2005-10-26       Impact factor: 5.994

4.  What influences the outcome of valve replacement in critical aortic stenosis?

Authors:  H Baumgartner
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 5.  [Aortic stenosis].

Authors:  W G Daniel; H Baumgartner; C Gohlke-Bärwolf; P Hanrath; D Horstkotte; K C Koch; A Mügge; H J Schäfers; F A Flachskampf
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 5.460

Review 6.  Low-gradient aortic valve stenosis: value and limitations of dobutamine stress testing.

Authors:  J Bermejo; R Yotti
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2006-04-18       Impact factor: 5.994

7.  Accurate estimation of global and regional cardiac function by retrospectively gated multidetector row computed tomography: comparison with cine magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Bénédicte Belge; Emmanuel Coche; Agnès Pasquet; Jean-Louis J Vanoverschelde; Bernhard L Gerber
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-03-02       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 8.  Low "gradient", low flow aortic stenosis.

Authors:  John Chambers
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 9.  Low-gradient aortic stenosis.

Authors:  Marie-Annick Clavel; Julien Magne; Philippe Pibarot
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2016-03-31       Impact factor: 29.983

Review 10.  Nontransplant surgical options for congestive heart failure.

Authors:  J Ferrão de Oliveira; Manuel J Antunes
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 2.931

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.