Literature DB >> 10778819

Associations between primary care physician satisfaction and self-reported aspects of utilization management.

E A Kerr1, B S Mittman, R D Hays, J K Zemencuk, J Pitts, R H Brook.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the association between physician-reported utilization management (UM) techniques in capitated physician groups and physician satisfaction with capitated care. STUDY
SETTING: 1,138 primary care physicians from 89 California capitated physician groups in 1995. STUDY
DESIGN: Eighty percent of physicians (N = 910) responded to a mail survey regarding the UM policies in their groups and their satisfaction with the care they deliver. Physician-reported UM strategies measured included group-mandated preauthorization (number of referrals requiring preauthorization, referral denial rate, and referral turnaround time), group-provided explicit practice guidelines, and group-delivered educational programs regarding capitated care. We also measured two key dimensions of satisfaction with capitated care (multi-item scales): (1) satisfaction with capitated care autonomy and quality, and (2) satisfaction with administrative burden for capitated patients. EXTRACTION
METHODS: We constructed two multivariate linear regression models to examine associations between physician-reported UM strategies and physician satisfaction, controlling for demographic and practice characteristics and adjusting for clustering. PRINCIPAL
FINDINGS: Physician-reported denial rate and turnaround time were significantly negatively associated with capitated care satisfaction. Physicians who reported that their groups provided more guidelines were more satisfied on both dimensions, while physicians who reported that their groups sponsored more educational programs were more satisfied with administrative burden. The number of clinical decisions requiring preauthorization was not significantly associated with either dimension of satisfaction.
CONCLUSIONS: Physicians who reported that their groups used UM methods that directly affected their autonomy (high denial rates and long turnaround times) were less satisfied with care for capitated patients. However, a preauthorization policy for referrals or tests was not, in and of itself, associated with satisfaction. Indirect control mechanisms such as guidelines and education were positively associated with satisfaction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10778819      PMCID: PMC1089105     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Serv Res        ISSN: 0017-9124            Impact factor:   3.402


  16 in total

1.  Primary care physicians' satisfaction with quality of care in California capitated medical groups.

Authors:  E A Kerr; R D Hays; B S Mittman; A L Siu; B Leake; R H Brook
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1997 Jul 23-30       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Change, consolidation, and competition in health care markets.

Authors:  M Gaynor; D Haas-Wilson
Journal:  J Econ Perspect       Date:  1999

3.  The new medical marketplace: physicians' views.

Authors:  K Donelan; R J Blendon; G D Lundberg; D R Calkins; J P Newhouse; L L Leape; D K Remler; H Taylor
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  1997 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 6.301

Review 4.  Physicians, cost control, and ethics.

Authors:  D P Sulmasy
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1992-06-01       Impact factor: 25.391

5.  Preserving the physician-patient relationship in the era of managed care.

Authors:  E J Emanuel; N N Dubler
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1995-01-25       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Resolving the gatekeeper conundrum: what patients value in primary care and referrals to specialists.

Authors:  K Grumbach; J V Selby; C Damberg; A B Bindman; C Quesenberry; A Truman; C Uratsu
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1999-07-21       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  The influence of gatekeeping and utilization review on patient satisfaction.

Authors:  E A Kerr; R D Hays; A Mitchinson; M Lee; A L Siu
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 5.128

8.  Managed care and capitation in California: how do physicians at financial risk control their own utilization?

Authors:  E A Kerr; B S Mittman; R D Hays; A L Siu; B Leake; R H Brook
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1995-10-01       Impact factor: 25.391

9.  Controlling outpatient medical equipment costs through utilization management.

Authors:  T M Wickizer
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 2.983

10.  Physicians' characteristics influence patients' adherence to medical treatment: results from the Medical Outcomes Study.

Authors:  M R DiMatteo; C D Sherbourne; R D Hays; L Ordway; R L Kravitz; E A McGlynn; S Kaplan; W H Rogers
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 4.267

View more
  8 in total

1.  Physician discontent: a barometer of change and need for intervention.

Authors:  J S Haas
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  Variations in nurse practitioner use in Veterans Affairs primary care practices.

Authors:  Patty Y Huang; Elizabeth M Yano; Martin L Lee; Betty L Chang; Lisa V Rubenstein
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 3.402

3.  Organizational culture and physician satisfaction with dimensions of group practice.

Authors:  James L Zazzali; Jeffrey A Alexander; Stephen M Shortell; Lawton R Burns
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 3.402

4.  Physician "out of office" alert: does it work?

Authors:  M Clemons; A A Joy; J Hilton; A Arnaout; M Brackstone; P Wheatley-Price; C Stober; R Dinniwell; S Mazzarello; M da Costa; B Hutton
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2017-06-27       Impact factor: 3.677

5.  Improving efficiency and reducing administrative burden through electronic communication.

Authors:  Katlyn E Cook; Gail M Ludens; Amit K Ghosh; William C Mundell; Kevin C Fleming; Andrew J Majka
Journal:  Perm J       Date:  2013

6.  Managed care, physician job satisfaction, and the quality of primary care.

Authors:  David Grembowski; David Paschane; Paula Diehr; Wayne Katon; Diane Martin; Donald L Patrick
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 5.128

7.  [The patient's right to information: influence of socio-professional factors in primary care].

Authors:  M D Pérez-Cárceles; J E Pereñíguez-Barranco; E Osuna-Carrillo de Albornoz; A Luna-Maldonado
Journal:  Aten Primaria       Date:  2006-02-15       Impact factor: 1.137

8.  Aligning provider incentives to improve primary healthcare delivery in the United States.

Authors:  J E DeVoe; R Stenger
Journal:  OA Fam Med       Date:  2013-06-01
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.