Literature DB >> 10777439

Predator and Prey Models with Flexible Individual Behavior and Imperfect Information.

Barney Luttbeg, Oswald J Schmitz.   

Abstract

To begin identifying what behavioral details might be needed to characterize community dynamics and stability, we examined the effect of prey behavioral responses to predation risk on community dynamics and stability. We considered the case of prey altering their foraging effort to trade off energy gain and predation risk. We used state-dependent dynamic optimization to calculate the optimal trade-off for four models of prey behaviorally responding to predation risk. We consider a fixed behavior model in which prey use constant levels of foraging effort and three flexible behavior models in which prey change their foraging effort according to their physiological state and their perceived level of predation risk. Flexible behavior was destabilizing at the community level as evidenced by higher predator-prey oscillations and lower community persistence times. The mechanisms by which prey estimated predation risk also affected community stability. We found that community dynamics resulting from prey with flexible behavior and fixed perception of risk approximated community dynamics resulting from prey with flexible behavior and perfect information about predation risk, however neither approximated the community dynamics resulting from prey with flexible behavior and flexible perception of risk. Thus, whether it might be possible to abstract complex behavior with simpler rules when modeling community dynamics depends on the prey's behavioral mechanisms, which are empirically poorly known.

Keywords:  Bayesian updating; individual behavior; perception; predation risk; predator‐prey interactions

Year:  2000        PMID: 10777439     DOI: 10.1086/303344

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Nat        ISSN: 0003-0147            Impact factor:   3.926


  8 in total

1.  Behavioral mechanisms underlie an ant-plant mutualism.

Authors:  Jennifer A Rudgers; Jillian G Hodgen; J Wilson White
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2003-01-30       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Information from familiar and related conspecifics affects foraging in a solitary wolf spider.

Authors:  Catherine R Hoffman; Michael I Sitvarin; Ann L Rypstra
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2015-10-26       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 3.  The visual ecology of fiddler crabs.

Authors:  Jochen Zeil; Jan M Hemmi
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2005-12-10       Impact factor: 1.836

4.  Size-mediated adaptive foraging: a host-selection strategy for insect parasitoids.

Authors:  Lee Mason Henry; Brian O Ma; Bernard D Roitberg
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2009-06-06       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 5.  Predation, individual variability and vertebrate population dynamics.

Authors:  Nathalie Pettorelli; Tim Coulson; Sarah M Durant; Jean-Michel Gaillard
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2011-07-15       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Human hunters and nonhuman predators: Fundamental differences.

Authors:  Richard Zeckhauser
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-12-28       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Consumption of salmon by Alaskan brown bears: a trade-off between nutritional requirements and the risk of infanticide?

Authors:  Merav Ben-David; Kimberly Titus; LaVern R Beier
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2003-12-13       Impact factor: 3.225

8.  The effect of prior experience on a prey's current perceived risk.

Authors:  Michael E Fraker
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2008-10-22       Impact factor: 3.225

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.